Is there a twist in the diaper story?

[bushcrab]

No pun intended, but I haven't yet fallen for this story by our carrot-dangling MSM. Like the John Carr fiasco, this Pampers tale is just a little too much to swallow. Yet even the cagey DU'ers here seem hook, line and sinkered. Such a bizarre story, yet no skepticism??

Here's one, credibility unknown, but at least it's some skepticism! :

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index981.htm

" Russian Intelligence reports, however, paint a startling different picture of this event in detailing Lt. Commander Nowak’s flight across the United States yesterday from Tucson, Arizona where she was an ‘official’ NASA Observer with the Vatican Observatory Research Group Vatican Advanced Technology Telescope (VATT), at the Mount Graham International Observatory (MGIO) in southeastern Arizona.

These reports further state that the Vatican Telescope was tracking the ‘anomalous object’ that had ‘grazed’ our Earth’s atmosphere over Siberia causing 100 square kilometers to be covered with the ‘residue’ this past week, and which many reports from that region described as ‘multi-coloured’ snow.

The ‘anomalous object’ was then reportedly ‘brought down’ by US Strategic Command Forces over North America on Sunday, and which resulted in an enormous Fireball seen throughout the Northern Regions of the Untied States, after which Lt. Commander Nowak began her attempt to flee the United States for protection form the Vatican. "

[jobycom]

1. LOL! I really can't tell if you're joking.

If so, bravo! If not--sorry. :rofl:

[havocmom]

2. Hmm, interesting. Orange snow WAS pretty odd.

And the Vatican was mighty persistant about building that scope on Mt Graham, over the wishes of the Native Peoples who hold that peak sacred. Have always wondered what the Church was so insistant on watching from that mountian.

Thanks for the post. Good catch.

[npincus]

3. that's a batshit crazy website

[mike_c]

4. LOL-- oh my, I followed the link....

Really, I urge everyone to do so. It's a hoot!

[Beelzebud]

5. mmmmmmmmmk

[The Straight Story]

6. The DaVinci Diaper Code....(nt)

[bushcrab]

8. maybe it has to do with

Uranus...The diaper is for covering up Uranus...

Spit the hook out folks! You all really believe the diaper run??

[WilliamPitt]

7. "protection form the Vatican"

I make in my pants sometimes.

Mmmmm...pants.

[Sanity Claws]

9. HaHa

I think I'd give him an "a" for effort, if he were in my creative writing class.

[Dhalgren]

10. This story, to me, makes more sense than the "official" story.

Nowak is an Annapolis grad, a Navy Lt. Commander, has over 1000 hours piloting aircraft, is an ASTRONAUT for the gods sake! And she drives across the country in diapers to shoot with a BB gun and spray pepper on a woman she has never met? And all because of a guy she says is more than a colleague but less than a romantic interest? Oh yeah. Our astronauts do this kind of thing all the time. Par for the course. This is not the story. It may not be the (really funny) Russian account, but it ain't the "official" one, either...

[Ezlivin]

12. Do you believe in UFOs?

If so, then you know that most people have already labeled you as a "kook", "nutcase", "unhinged", "out of touch with reality" and other things.

I believe that something is going on. Exactly what, I don't know. But you can't read dozens of accounts from unimpeachable, intelligent witnesses and not think that something is amiss.

For the sake of argument, let's assume that the Russian intelligence service is 100% correct: She saw a UFO, knew that our government knew about it and then saw that it was destroyed. And she saw another cover-up. Maybe she just "snapped", but in a way much different than that portrayed in the media. She wanted to get the "truth" out about what had happened. The easiest thing for the government to do was to smear with an outrageous story. Now if she talks most people will dismiss her as a "nutcase" or "unhinged". There is precious little chance that the American public will give credence to what she says. So if she tries to reveal the cover-up she'll get no attention.

The story we've been told does sound pretty bizarre. A good rule of thumb? Question authority.

[Dhalgren]

15. This is just what I was saying. The "official" story makes no sense on its face.

But because it involves sex, adultery, a wild-eyed woman, and diapers it doesn't matter if it makes sense or not. Yippee! We got us a sure-fire week to two week/Tonight Show/David Letterman squeeze-fest here! I have no idea what the true story is, but I don't buy the one foisted on the public. I always question authority. Especially the one we have today. To paraphrase Charles Fort, I will disbelieve nothing simply because it runs counter to conventional wisdom. As far as UFOs go, I have no evidence that they do not exist. I have no evidence that everyone claiming to have seen one is a fool or a liar. I have seen things that I cannot explain. I don't make claims as to what these things were, because I do not know. But I won't dismiss an account of someone's experience as being anything other than what it is - that person's experience...

[Ezlivin]

16. Exactly

I've asked many people what they would do in this hypothetical case:

You've asked 50 of the most trustworthy people you know personally to drive out and meet you at a central location at 10:00 PM. Each of these people are completely trustworthy and not the type to spout nonsense. As these people are on their way to meet you they encounter a UFO. You greet your guests as they arrive and hear their stories. They describe the UFO, how it appeared, how it moved, how it sounded and what it did. All 50 of them report nearly the same thing with some minor variations.

So you have 50 absolutely trustworthy witnesses of a UFO. What do you do with this information?

Every person I've asked have said roughly the same thing: Nothing. Why? Because they instinctively know that regardless of the quality of the evidence, they won't be listened to or, worse, they'll be the brunt of ridicule and scorn.

It's kind of sad that we will not act on good eyewitness information if it concerns UFOs because "everyone knows that's nutty."

[Dhalgren]

17. It is like the dreaded "Conspiracy Theory". Even if you had a

mountain of evidence for a conspiracy, it would still be ridiculed. For some reason anything attached to the word "conspiracy" immediately becomes a target of ridicule. The same is true with Unidentified Flying Objects. If I saw an airplane, but could not (for whatever reasons) identify the object as an airplane, I would have witnessed a "UFO". But just the mention of "UFO", turns everything into an excuse to ridicule, belittle, and deride. I think that this kind of behavior is a display of ignorance or stupidity - I am not sure which...

[Breeze54]

11. What kind of car can go 900 miles without stopping for gas?

:rofl: (Letterman said that last night.)

[originalpckelly]

13. Oh come the fuck on. This is more bullshit from Sorcha Faal...

this is not a credible story.

Why do people keep posting from fucking Pravda?

[LSK]

14. it is a crime story and has no relevance to politics or Govt

So I am ignoring it.

[Quantess]

18. Let me get this straight:

You don't believe the story because of the diapers? You don't believe that a high-achieving, ambitious, astronaut would wear diapers on a road trip?

I think the diaper detail is true because #1. Astronauts use adult diapers during missions, at least that's what I'm told. #2. She probably has a potty training issue leftover from childhood. Maybe she was too harshly potty trained, or she was a bed wetter as a kid, or something.