Rice, Gates win no new promises of Arab help for Iraq, despite bribing them with weapons sales

[bigtree]

July 31, 2007 5:33 AM
Associated Press

SHARM EL-SHEIK, Egypt (AP) - The United States won no specific new promises of Arab help for struggling Iraq after a gathering Tuesday of several nations listed as recipients of an expanded aid and weapons package for friendly states in the region.

Iraq's Arab neighbors repeated a general pledge to promote stability in Iraq, torn by more than four years of war and bitter sectarian divisions that have killed thousands and driven far more from their homes.

Rice and Defense Secretary Robert Gates are making a rare joint show of diplomatic force during two days of meetings with Arab allies - part of an 11th-hour effort to rally diplomatic and practical help for the U.S.-backed Shiite-led government in Baghdad. The tour also opens talks on a proposed U.S. arms package for Arab states worth more than $20 billion.

But at a press conference with her Egyptian host, Rice pointed to no fresh commitments from the Arabs. A statement issued following a nine-nation meeting promised only ''to continue to support Iraq and expand their financial and political support,'' and restated a general commitment to blocking would-be terrorists and financing that supports them from entering Iraq.


Hours before Rice and Gates embarked on their diplomatic mission, the Bush administration announced Monday a proposed U.S. arms package to Arab nations worth more than $20 billion. The sophisticated weaponry, according to U.S. officials, would strengthen relatively moderate Persian Gulf regimes against extremist regimes and ideologies, chief among them Iran.

Rice said the arms deal, along with an aid package for Israel and Egypt, was not a trade-off for assistance . . .


report: http://www.newspress.com/Top/Article/article.jsp?Section=WORLD&ID=565060676713055245

[madrchsod]

1. over 30 billion of taxpayers money for nothing

will the next president change this give away to the middle east and spend OUR money on US?

[Supersedeas]

2. the Def Contractors are pleased with the Taxpayer investment in future wars

[Johonny]

3. Doesn't this deal have to be approved by Congress?

[bigtree]

4. yes it does

the problem with expecting them to oppose the sales which are the hook in these deals is that these countries on the wish list include ones who've already received this type of (bipartisan) support from Congress in the past.

[Prisoner_Number_Six]

5. "Diplomatic force" - with the emphasis on force

as usual.

:shrug:

[bigtree]

6. right

first the demonstration of their product; shock and awe.

next, the fomenting of chaos in the neighborhood.

then, the hard sell of their protection scheme.