Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elliot D. Cohen: Impeach Bush and Cheney Now, Before They Declare Martial Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 03:30 PM
Original message
Elliot D. Cohen: Impeach Bush and Cheney Now, Before They Declare Martial Law
A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION

There is presently a serious possibility that America will come under martial law before the 2008 presidential election and be irretrievably turned into a totalitarian state. If this happens there won't even be a free election in 2008. We can and should eliminate this ominous threat to national security by impeaching Bush and Cheney now. But the man in charge, John Conyers, is afraid of what Fox News might say about him.

In my recent article, This Summer, will America Officially Become a Totalitarian State?" I presented the following facts:

In May 2007, Bush posted a national continuity policy to the White House Web site that bypasses Congress and puts him in charge of all three branches of the federal government if there is a "catastrophic emergency" -- vaguely defined to include anything from a destructive hurricane to a terrorist attack. This leaves democracy in America dangling on a thin thread of chance that such a "catastrophe" doesn't happen.

On Wednesday , Michael Chertoff, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, said he has a "gut" feeling that Al Qaeda will launch another terrorist attack on the U.S. mainland sometime this summer. Chertoff's "gut feeling" comes on the heels of the latest National Intelligence Estimate , which maintains that in the past year, Al Qaeda has reconstituted its core structure and has grown stronger along the Pakistan/Afghanistan border.


Curiously, the story about Bush's national continuity policy received (virtually) no mainstream media coverage, and its significance in light of the recent NIE report was not broached. Yet, these facts point to a serious and disturbing possibility that a "catastrophic emergency" in the form of a terrorist attack on the homeland will occur before the next presidential election, giving the Bush administration the green light to turn the United States into a totalitarian state. Notice that this is not based on speculation or groundless conspiracy theory. It is based only on the facts: With the posting of the current national continuity policy, Bush has ipso facto announced his intention to take over all three branches of the federal government in the event of another serious terrorist attack. And the NIE does "judge that the United States is currently in a heightened threat environment."

Full article here: http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/1196
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. My question is this: Does Bush really have the "power" to claim he will be in charge
of all branches of government if a catastrophic emergency occurs?

The Constitution limits the power any one arm of government has, so it would seem contrary to this statement that Bush could claim such far-reaching power and have others recognize it.

Bush can sign anything he wants to, but if it's illegal or unconstitutional, it won't stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No. And the executive order he signed doesn't purport to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Uh huh. And how does Georgie plan to enforce this crap?
I don't doubt he'd love to do it. I really don't. It's the how that's a just a wee bit fuzzy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He just seems to go ahead
and do what he wants anyway and no one stops him.

Just like the '06 election results seemed like a resounding victory for anti-war sentiment but what does Shrub do...he sends even more troops!

The surge was the biggest f*** you to America he could have done and he did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Blackwater?
maybe?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. well, that's one way to get the troops back from iraq--because he is going to need each and every
one of them when he does this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Actually they've got sufficient troops stateside to do with as they wish
They've been brainwashing training Americans to think that liberal equals traitor. They've got their media assets working fulltime to bring enough patriotic citizens around to this point of view.

It won't be hard to get lots of volunteers to join the "new" National Guard, particularly in areas with high unemployment. And like the NG at Kent State, they won't have a problem firing upon other Americans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
9.  Part of my concern is this
People talk about martial law in such an event and feel this can't happen . Well it won't be an over night massive sweep , all they need to do is gather up people who they consider any sort of threat to their policy and haul them away to their many containment camps and then go after more .

I always visioned this as some ,mass pickup but when I think about how they would do this without a enormous army even considering blackwater this would most likely be the way it would work . You or I may be missed by those who know us but the rest of the country won't know or care until they come for them .

All I want to do is try to live out whats let of my life even if I just make it by and have nothing , that's all , I don't want to have to think about this shit but then I can't ignore it either , not in light of all these freaks have done and gotten away with .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC