Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rice and Gates differ over the importance of contingency planning.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 08:06 AM
Original message
Rice and Gates differ over the importance of contingency planning.
Amid the taunting, serious discussion of the war continued. Testifying yesterday before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates revealed that the Pentagon, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and other agencies are devising a "sophisticated checklist or matrix" to measure the Iraqi government's performance in meeting various benchmarks linked to Bush's new strategy. Gates added that he is considering alternative courses of action in case the Baghdad security operation fails.

"I would be irresponsible if I weren't thinking about what the alternatives might be if that didn't happen," Gates testified. "But we, at this point, are planning for its success."


(from "Senate Leaders Continue Squabbling Over Iraq", Washington Post, February 7, 2007)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/06/AR2007020600553.html

----------------------------------------------

Many Bush critics and allies still doubt Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's government is willing or able to challenge murderous militias, under a plan which will see 21,500 US troops surge into Baghdad and Al-Anbar province and three more Iraqi brigades in the capital.

Top administration officials are however adamant that contemplating an alternative would simply doom the current plan to failure.

"I don't think you go to plan B. You work with plan A," Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Thursday, explaining why the administration had no contingency plans lined up.


(from "No Plan B in Bush Iraq strategy", Yahoo News, January 14, 2007)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070114/wl_mideast_afp/usiraqbushplan

----------------------------------------------

So Condi thinks it is acceptable, and indeed vital, to go into a costly, dangerous mission without any thought whatsoever about what to do if the ambitious, improbable plan should fail. She claims that if you formulate a contingency plan, you doom the original plan to failure. This foolish statement alone should disqualify her from holding any government or leadership position.

But, knowing how the Bush regime works, she's about due for a medal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Condi NEVER has a "plan B". .
She thinks planning is for wimps and losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Faith-based administrations don't need no stinkin' contingency plans!
You just got to believe harder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echotrail Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just think. Condi is our TOP diplomat.
Now with John "Iran-Contra" Negroponte at her side.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC