Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why hasn't anyone asked Andy Card what they went to Ashcroft for?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:05 AM
Original message
Why hasn't anyone asked Andy Card what they went to Ashcroft for?
Edited on Thu Jul-26-07 11:09 AM by Hubert Flottz
Put Andrew H. Card, Jr on the hot seat and if he don't show up file a contempt charge...

Andy knows why they went...and he wasn't bush's lawyer, so he could answer the question that gonzo couldn't answer the other day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fjc Donating Member (700 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why haven't they asked Ashcroft?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Good idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. They did, in June; Ashcroft says Gonzo was lying:

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/06/21/ashcroft-contradicts-gonzales-wiretapping-testimony/

Ashcroft contradicts Gonzales wiretapping testimony.

In sworn testimony to Congress in 2006, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said that there had “not been any serious disagreement” over President Bush’s warrantless wiretapping program. But today, former Attorney General John Ashcroft — who almost resigned in protest over the program — told a House panel that in reality, the administration was “sharply divided over the legality of President Bush’s most controversial eavesdropping policies.” June 21, 2007 5:54 pm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
43. Why haven't they asked the Secret Service guys?
Edited on Fri Jul-27-07 01:15 AM by Canuckistanian
This seems to be a pretty sloppy "investigation" when 80% of the people present haven't been questioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Probably the same reason for not asking Ashcroft himself.
Maybe they will get to it in round 2, AFTER THE RECESS!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. or Mrs. Ashcroft
SHE is not covered by ANY privilege. If they let her overhear, they blew themselves out of the water
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. A very good idea!
Edited on Thu Jul-26-07 11:40 AM by Hubert Flottz
I think they scared John so badly with their lawless bullshit, that he quit. I think the Ashcrofts are scared shitless of the Bush Gang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. YES! This is what I've been waiting and waiting for, and haven't seen
anyone but you mention it.

When they asked Gonzales if Mrs. Ashcroft was in the hospital room when
he had his discussion with Ashcroft, he said he didn't recall. If she was,
then that alone would make him guilty of breaking the law, right? And
everything else would be icing on the cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. as I recall Comey said she was n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Yes, Comey said Mrs. Ashcroft was in the room - but why hasn't the committee
asked her to testify?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. no telling
they aren't stupid though - they are mostly former prosecutors - either they know she'd be hostile or they are holding her for later - we'll see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. That sounds right. Thanks. And BTW -
I really enjoy your posts. Been meaning to tell you,
so this little volley came in handy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. thanks!
someone who doesn't have me on ignore! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. I thought they did question him behind closed doors, or was that
just a dream I had?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I never heard anything about it if they did...
The democrats in congress should leave no stone unturned, IF they want to ever really get to the truth.

I'll bet ace crime fighter Arlen Specter changes his tune after he talks to the Fuhrer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. You can count on that imo. Arlen, the original flip=flopper. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. I recall reading that Ashcroft met with the Committee in closed session and answered questions
I remember thinking at the time that this would have been one time that a former Bush official, who had disagreed with Bush and resigned, would tell the truth in public under oath.

But it was not to be.

However, I suspect that Leahy, Schumer and the rest got a lot of useful information that they used to guide them in questioning Gonzo yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. Mrs. Ashcroft
BHJ-- I remember talk of having both John Ashcroft and his wife testify behind closed doors, after Comey's testimony.

Not sure that Mrs. Ashcroft did, but I'm sure that she would have been protected by the committee. She was trying to keep those jerks away from her husband after all.

I would wager that yes, definitely, they got a lot of useful info from one or both.

Was it Schumer who asked Gonzo yesterday if he discussed classified information in the presence of Mrs. Ashcroft, who does not, of course, have a clearance? I believe the question was asked at least a couple of times while gonzo hemmed and hawed. (hmm ... I have to find a transcript of yesterday's SJC hearing!)

glc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Not sure, but don't think it was Schumer who asked about Mrs. Ashcroft
but I only heard the question asked once during the hearing.
Gonzo answered that he ...um. er, unh (wait for it)...
didn't recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. er...
didn't recall? Gonzo? the A.G. of the U.S.?

I'm shocked! Shocked!

Seriously though, whoever asked it -- Leahy, Whitehouse, someone else, it signalled for sure that someone has described the scene in the hospital ICU in exquisite detail to the SJC members.

glc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. Not sure who asked, but Gonzo replied that Ashcroft disclosed no classified info in her presence...
... which if you believe Comey's testimony, that is another questionable statement by Gonzo.

Comey recalled that he was surprised that Ashcroft was able to recall their conversation in such detail while in that state of sedation, and the he went through the arguments that they had agreed upon which caused them both to decide they could not approve the program as it existed.

I still wonder if the 'program' as it has been referred to was in fact different from the prior 2 years because of more extensive and invasive tactics they were attempting to add to it. Obviously at some point Ashcroft had approved some kind of program, and if there had been no changes it would be unusual for Ashcroft to be so upset he contemplated resigning as soon as he was well enough to leave the hospital.

The whole matter stinks. I think agents went far afield in their surveillance and were trying to get Ashcroft to retroactively approve what was already done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Thanks
Thanks BHJ.
I remembered the question being asked but couldn't remember who asked or what was said!

(But did he say that he, Gonzo, had revealed no classified info in front of Mrs. A? 'Cause I'm thinking that in itself would be a crime.)

The whole deal does stink. My guess is that there was far more to what was being proposed than Ashcroft had previously signed off on. Will we ever find out what it all was? Let's hope so!

Knowing and understanding everything that they've done is as essential as ridding ourselves of the whole lot of them. One at a freakin' time...

glc

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. You are correct that if Gonzo revealed classified info in front of Mrs. Ashcroft it would be a crime
that is why there was questioning about a 'document' Gonzo had in his possession when he went to visit Ashcroft, where that document is today, and what was written on that document.

Obviously the questioner was making plans to subpoena that document. IMHO that could be a real 'smoking gun' that reveals extensive warrantless spying on Americans that has not yet been disclosed. If Ashcroft had signed off on it, the document would have been returned to the White House and kept in a secure location away from Congress, journalists, and any one else who wanted to see it --if they ever learned of its existence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Its was SO SICK....they go to a sedated guy recovering from a med procedure
so he can sign off on torture? even as they knew Comey had taken the transfer of power?

To watch Gonsy explain that to Shummer at the hearings was laughable...Gonsy was a high school kid lying his ass off.

They need to ask all them suckers involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Right drag the whole damned goon crew in and pump them.
A little waterboarding might help get some answers here too.

Hook a couple of 90 pound cinder blocks to the ole short and curlys with the ole 500 dollar a pair DOD/Halliburton vise grips and cross examine away! Bring on the Hell Hounds! We need answers PDQ and congress is quaint!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. Andy Card will tell the truth ?????
Bwahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. He just might, to save his own ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. Prolly stonewall and get pardoned just like them others sitting on the canary fence
wondering whether to sing or not to sing....tweet tweet tweet?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. I think Ashcroft and Andy Card both are just as guilty as Bush and
Cheney and Gonzo and Rove...they wanted to fix things so that a democrat never gets back in the White House again, so that all their criminal shit will remain hidden from the people forever. I think they may have misunderestimated Gawd, or fate, or whatever you call it though. I think that one fine day the truth will all come out and the taxpayers deserve nothing less that the whole truth, about Their Government!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. American Dreams of a BENEVOLENT Form of GOV'T have been squished by the BUSHCO
The Masses are pissed....soon the pitchforks and pikes to the Bastille.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. He lied on The Daily Show. He said he didn't have an RNC email account.
Then his RNC email account info was revealed, right along with every other political operative Bush has working in our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. There are probably several people that have testified we're not
aware of. Just my guess, though. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. Fredo already admitted why they went to Ashcroft
Edited on Thu Jul-26-07 02:50 PM by George Oilwellian
In his testimony the other day, he admitted they wanted Ashcroft to sign off on Bush's wiretapping program.

Also, the Senate Intel Cmte did have a closed hearing with Ashcroft last month:

Former attorney general John D. Ashcroft told the House intelligence committee yesterday about disputes in the Bush administration over aspects of its domestic surveillance program, which peaked in the March 2004 visit to his hospital bedside by White House officials seeking his change of heart.

House Intelligence Chairman Silvestre Reyes (D-Tex.) said the two-hour closed-door hearing covered Ashcroft's "whole tenure as attorney general." The hearing, Reyes said, examined how the administration viewed the use of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act provisions requiring a special court to issue warrants for domestic eavesdropping.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/21/AR2007062101022.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Mueller has just contradicted Gonzo's
lying testimony from yesterday. It's over - every man for himself as of now. Gonzo has fugged himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Comey also testified Under Oath that the Warentless Spying
continued for a "few weeks" until NSA started complying to the FISA Law. The Law was being violated. The DOJ knew that. So did Gonzo. The problem has been that Documents have been hard to obtain that prove the criminal acts of the members of the Busholini Regime. Congress has been blocked & stonewalled. Also, Sentate Repugs have been obstructing progress and Bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. There is no attorney/client privledge between Gonzo and Bush
Gonzo's client is us, the citizens of the US, not Bush. This is well settled law. Which is why Gonzo has not claimed atty/client privledge. The only alleged privledge is executive privledge unless Bush goes out and hires his own lawyer on his own dime (like Clinton did eventually.)

(As a side bar, this executive privledge thing bugs me. I work for government and there is nothing I say to my boss I wouldn't want on the front page of the newspaper. Granted my boss is only an agency head but we are all scratching our heads here wondering what people would say to the executive the wouldn't want heard by others.)

It's the flipping coverup, stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. All throughout history...coverups rarely work in the long term...this one is doomed to failure
BushCo is hiding some major crap.....If its one thing we have learned...sooner or Later..the Truth emerges like lava from a volcano.

Card has to have some answers...will he sing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. talking about Watergate on CatWoman's thread...we need a John Dean
I trust we'll get one sooner or later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Heat to the Feet and they will prolly sing louder than the Tongan Choir
Sooner than later, someone will save their own ass and rat on the PUBs/Bush/etc....especially now that the temp is escalating. The Rats are scambling for the rabbit hole....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. which is why the heat is so essential
relentless hearings, subpoenas, confrontations - somebody will crack

we have a cadre of experienced prosecutors driving this, and they'll get there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. I didn't know they had a secret session with Ashcroft...
I'll bet the Bushies were sweating bullets that day. Bush might need to pardon every GOPer in Washington before this is all over. Even the GOPer rats in congress are Bush's accomplices in his war crimes and rip-offs.

It's not enough to see the bassturds thrown out of the government, but they should pay for their crimes like common criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #36
42. I wanna see the perp walk.....chains, shackles, cuffs, leg irons, choke collars, Lector Masks, etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Me too...
I want to see the most painful thing the GOPers could imagine...JUSTICE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Reactivate the IRON MASK...(gasp)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
40. K&R n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC