So we learn from today's
Washington Post that Defense Secretary Robert Gates says he has not seen Sen. Clinton's original letter to him, in which she requested details for U.S. plans to withdraw from Iraq.
From the
Washington Post:
In a statement, Gates said that he had not seen Clinton's original letter, but he added that he welcomes congressional involvement.
"I have long been a staunch advocate of Congressional oversight, first at the CIA and now at the Defense Department," Gates said. "I have said on several occasions in recent months that I believe that Congressional debate on Iraq has been constructive and appropriate. I had not seen Senator Clinton's reply to Ambassador Edelman's letter until today. I am looking into the issues she raised and will respond to them early next week." (
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/20/AR2007072002124.html)
This revelation, in my mind, raises one major question: just who is in charge at the Department of Defense?
Robert Gates needs to ask himself why is it that he has not seen a letter from a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, which has oversight of the Department of Defense?
You would think that, as Secretary of Defense, he would ensure that he sees all correspondence originating from members of Congress, and especially one on the Armed Services Committee.
And he needs to ask himself why an Undersecretary was allowed to respond to that member of Congress, with a purely political response, and not a response that addresses the serious policy questions posed.
Just who is running the Department of Defense?