Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gates Says He Hasn't Seen Sen. Clinton's Original Letter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 10:52 AM
Original message
Gates Says He Hasn't Seen Sen. Clinton's Original Letter
Edited on Sat Jul-21-07 10:52 AM by journalist3072
So we learn from today's Washington Post that Defense Secretary Robert Gates says he has not seen Sen. Clinton's original letter to him, in which she requested details for U.S. plans to withdraw from Iraq.

From the Washington Post:

In a statement, Gates said that he had not seen Clinton's original letter, but he added that he welcomes congressional involvement.

"I have long been a staunch advocate of Congressional oversight, first at the CIA and now at the Defense Department," Gates said. "I have said on several occasions in recent months that I believe that Congressional debate on Iraq has been constructive and appropriate. I had not seen Senator Clinton's reply to Ambassador Edelman's letter until today. I am looking into the issues she raised and will respond to them early next week."
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/20/AR2007072002124.html)

This revelation, in my mind, raises one major question: just who is in charge at the Department of Defense?

Robert Gates needs to ask himself why is it that he has not seen a letter from a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, which has oversight of the Department of Defense?

You would think that, as Secretary of Defense, he would ensure that he sees all correspondence originating from members of Congress, and especially one on the Armed Services Committee.

And he needs to ask himself why an Undersecretary was allowed to respond to that member of Congress, with a purely political response, and not a response that addresses the serious policy questions posed.

Just who is running the Department of Defense?









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who's running the DoD? The same evil bastard that's running
everything else. Cheney, of couse.

They just name people to head agencies. They're the front men for the handful of criminals in the White House who are pulling the strings and claiming executive privilege.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm thinking, hey, if I were runinng the Pentagon, I'd at least read my damn mail.
Maybe even hire some administrative assistants to sort it and prioritize it. Who knows -- maybe let fly and get a date-stampe and a mail room.

But that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Exactly right! You know, when this first came to light a few days ago
I was thinking that Gates read Clinton's original letter, and he delegated it to Edelman to respond.

I was truly floored this morning after reading that he never even saw the letter. That's just unacceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. does the buck stop with you, Secretary Gates? It's a supervisor's job to GEt the letter
or be shown for the incompetent, ineffectual, bootlicking crony you are.

Your choice, sir...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. To your questions....
He got caught with his pants down and now he's using the Sgt. Schultz defense. "I know nothing!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Just who is running the Department of Defense? "
The Emperor is running the DoD, just like he's running the DoJ and all of the other parts of the Executive Branch, and let's not forget that he also controls most ot the Judicial Branch and parts of the Legislative Branch as well.

In other words, King George is a unitary executive, just ask Samuel"I'd sell out the Constitution" Alito!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bongo Prophet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. Gates should know that Edelman is his KEEPER
Edited on Sat Jul-21-07 11:02 AM by Bongo Prophet
Edelman = Cheney's boy.
Like Powell had a keeper, and others not quite BFEE level1


Gee, shouldn't that trouble old Bob Gates that the family he has served for so long needs to keep an eye on him?

Irony abounds.

On edit: Yeah, that was a babylon 5 reference. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good Cop/Bad Cop Game
This regime played it with Colin Powell. He was the assumed "voice of reason"...the adult among the juveniles in the executive. He was never directly tainted to anything and the corporate media turned to him as a "calming" voice...the ultimate non-denial denial. And what was Colin's usual defense? He didn't know. And we know he didn't. It was a deliberate ruse that allows a political hit to go down unchallenged and a regime mouthpiece left holding the bag where the "controversy" is smooth-talked away.

After Powell left, Rove must have noticed that he didn't have s useful foil...despite attempts to make Condi into one (she was just too inept for even that role). Well they got one in Gates. He comes across as such a "reasonable" fellow. He talks "reasonable" talk...he is a contrast to Rummy's intense and a "darn nice guy". He's the perfect screen for a goon like Edeleman to shoot memes now that will become talking points next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC