Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The first "benchmark" expected of the Iraqi gov't. has been missed.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:38 PM
Original message
The first "benchmark" expected of the Iraqi gov't. has been missed.
The Iraqi government appears to have failed to achieve the very first concrete benchmark that White House officials announced as part of the new combined US-Iraqi security push in Baghdad.

At a White House briefing on January 10 by two anonymous senior administration officials, one made this startlingly verifiable promise to a press corps highly skeptical of the administration's amorphous benchmarks for Iraq:

"SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Well, here's -- but you're going to have to -- you're going to have some opportunities to judge very quickly. The Iraqis are going to have three brigades within Baghdad within a little more than a month. They have committed to trying to get one brigade in, I think, by the first of February, and two more by the 15th. . . .

"So people are going to be able to see pretty quickly that the Iraqis are or are not stepping up. And that provides the ability to judge."

Alright, so now it's past the first of the month, and how's it going?

Steven R. Hurst reported on Thursday (Feb. 1) for the Associated Press: "Local commanders. . . . said only about 2,000 of the additional troops had reached Baghdad or were nearby. . . .

"An Iraqi army brigade from Irbil, about 3,000 men in principle, will have at most 1,500 men when it finally arrives in Baghdad. The commander says 95 percent of the men don't speak Arabic. A brigade from Sulaimaniyah, also in the Kurdish north, has reached the Muthana Airport in central Baghdad, but it is only 1,000-men strong, not the expected 3,000."

More: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/linkset/2005/04/11/LI2005041100879.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Smacks of another 'Snowjob'
Sr. Admin Official :eyes: Just put his/her name in print, ferchristsake!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maliki's Ordered the Iraqi Military to Speed Up
:rofl:

Maliki Orders Iraqi Military to Speed Up Security Crackdown
By VOA News
06 February 2007
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-02-06-voa47.cfm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sometimes I think this war doesn't exist as a real war. It's just a big
Edited on Tue Feb-06-07 02:45 PM by sfexpat2000
diversion. "Look over there while we steal you and them blind." I don't mean that people aren't dying or being terribly hurt or destroyed. And I don't mean that "battle" isn't engaged and so on. It has all the outward trappings of a real war. But the main objective of the Iraq war is to enrich Bush cronies and the rest of it is not actually important to this misAdministration.

And that's important because that disregard skews every decision that is made down the line.

/typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. bush* will lower the threshold and demand less and call it more....
Edited on Tue Feb-06-07 02:47 PM by spanone
This whole scenario is a farce. I really don't think that truth matters one iota to the criminals in charge. IMO

I'm sure we'll hear about this on tonight's news coverage.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Who can trust Maliki?
U.S. military: Iraqi lawmaker is U.S. Embassy bomber

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- A man sentenced to death in Kuwait for the 1983 bombings of the U.S. and French embassies now sits in Iraq's parliament as a member of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's ruling coalition, according to U.S. military intelligence.

Jamal Jafaar Mohammed's seat in parliament gives him immunity from prosecution. Washington says he supports Shiite insurgents and acts as an Iranian agent in Iraq.

-snip-

more at http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/02/05/iraq.lawmaker/index.html


This makes no sense to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. This of course is an endless game
He'll keep moving the target because 'we can't afford to lose' in IraqNam. This will be punted to the next president to deal with, and then blame shall surround he/she who ends it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Iraqi paper: participants will receive bonuses “to guarantee their participation”

http://www.iraqslogger.com/index.php/post/1220/Iraqi_Papers_Tues_Refugees_In_Syria_Threatened

<snip>

In its Iraqi edition, Az-Zaman said that the Iraqi forces participating in the Baghdad Security Plan will receive bonuses “to guarantee their participation” in the operation. Quoting an American colonel, the daily said that one of the hurdles to previous operations was the reluctance of Iraqi soldiers -- who do not originate in Baghdad -- to serve in remote areas. In order to alleviate this issue, the army will be paying all non-Baghdadi soldiers a special bonus to compensate for their relocation.

Az-Zaman also said that the operational headquarters will be directed by an Iraqi brigadier who had fought against the American army in the Second Gulf War (1991). American sources said that, despite having an Iraqi in charge, American soldiers will not be receiving orders from Iraqi officers; there was no explanation as to how that would be possible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. This should be mailed to Pelosi/Reid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. So the Iraqi government has failed its first test:
OK, Dubya, time to break out a Medal of Freedom! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. morning kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. Force levels of Brigades can vary
so even though the expectation was for each brigade to be 3000 strong levels as low a 1500 could still legitimately be considered a Brigade.

What bothers me more than the levels is the reported composition. Kurdish units guarding the airport in Sunni Baghdad and another unit, also from the Kurdish north, with only 5% arabic speakers. This won't sit well with either Sunni or Shiite and smacks of desperation to meet the benchmarks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IWantAChange Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. a few soldiers finally show up - 95% of one group don't speak Arabic - others appear to be Kurds -
Sounds to me like GeorgieBoy has managed to transfer Repug BizzaroWorld to Iraq. We now have a bit of a concentration inside Baghdad of all the parties that despise one another - thank goodness we have a Republican Administration in charge or I'd REALLLLLY be concerned.

:sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC