Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anti-War Bloc in House Vows to Oppose Further Iraq Funding

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 03:25 PM
Original message
Anti-War Bloc in House Vows to Oppose Further Iraq Funding
http://public.cq.com/docs/cqm/cqmidday110-000002555651.html

Anti-War Bloc in House Vows to Oppose Further Iraq Funding

A group of 69 House Democrats has put the White House on notice that its members will not support any more war funding bills unless the measures include a timeline for withdrawal from Iraq.

“We agree with a clear and growing majority of the American people who are opposed to continued, open-ended U.S. military operations in Iraq,” the anti-war bloc, led by California Democrats Lynn Woolsey and Barbara Lee, wrote in a letter to President Bush Thursday. Woolsey and Lee co-chair the Out of Iraq Caucus.

Ron Paul of Texas was the only Republican to sign the letter.

The announcement — the latest sign that Democrats are determined to limit U.S. involvement in Iraq —follows the decision by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., to pull the fiscal 2008 Defense authorization bill (HR 1585) from the Senate floor this week after attempts to add a withdrawal mandate were blocked by a GOP filibuster.

Rather than allow votes on non-binding withdrawal proposals, Reid decided to wait until more Republicans are ready to join Democrats on a mandatory timeline. Only four GOP senators crossed party lines July 18 to vote in favor of limiting debate on the withdrawal amendment to the defense bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder if they wrote this letter to Pelosi?? also
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's interesting that the percentage of real representatives of the American people
in Congress has not changed, from the Diebold I Congress (the last one) to Diebold II (this one). We vote, and nothing happens. A MINORITY of the Democratic Congress members is still trying--courageously, dauntlessly--to represent the great of majority of Americans. During Diebold I, that majority of Americans against the war grew from a significant 56%, just before the war (Feb. '03), to an overwhelming 70% majority today. And still nothing changes.

The "new" Congress puts "impeachment off the table" and re-funds the war with ANOTHER $100 billion of our non-existent money, for Bush/Cheney to kill more Iraqis in order to force them to give up their oil rights.

I think that's what Diebold/ES&S "trade secret," proprietary vote tabulation was/is all about--to retain that upside down percentage in Congress, against the interests and views of the great, peace-minded, justice-minded American majority, whether it has a 'D' in front of it, or an 'R.' Doesn't matter. Basically nothing changes, because two rightwing Bushite corporations--Diebold and ES&S--and now calling ALL election results from under a veil of corporate secrecy. The fascist vote in Congress ranges from about 55% to 70%, depending on the issue. The more important the issue is to the war profiteers and global corporate predators who are now running our government--"trade secret," proprietary vote counting, the war, military funding, troop safety/slave labor deployments, impeachment, accountability of any kind, Constitutional government, rule of law, "free trade" (global corporate piracy) rules, funding of the police state, domestic spying, etc.--the less representation we have.

These 69 House Democrats, who are trying to represent our interests, are not even 25% of the House. 25% was about where the strength of the real representatives was during Diebold I. So we may even have LOST GROUND by electing a so-called Democratic Congress.

Impeachment "off the table."
The ONLY Constitutional tool for reining in an out-of-control president is "off the table."
The war is ESCALATED, and larded with more money.
Not stopped. Not de-funded. Not even a time-table.
ESCALATED!
Now Bush/Cheney can do anything they damn please--like today, Bush's statement that he will NOT enforce ANY Congressional subpoenas.
That is the direct result of taking "impeachment off the table." (WHAT table, Nancy? WHOSE table?)

Is this what the American people voted for?
DID the American people in fact vote?
Or did Diebold/ES&S just program Karl Rove's figures into their "trade secret" code?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC