Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congressional Research Service says Bush Overreaches on Executive Privilege

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 10:01 AM
Original message
Congressional Research Service says Bush Overreaches on Executive Privilege
from RawStory: http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Government_agency_says_Bush_overreaches_on_0720.html


Friday July 20, 2007

A report earlier this month by the Congressional Research Service, a nonpartisan agency that studies policy and legal questions for Members of Congress, found that President George W. Bush's recent assertions of 'executive privilege' to fend off Congressional investigators were dubious.

Morton Rosenberg, a Specialist in American Public Law at CRS, said that the assertion of privilege recently attempted by the White House went beyond restraints found in recent legal decisions.

"Recent appellate court rulings cast considerable doubt on the broad claims of privilege posited by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel in the past and now by the Clement Memo," Rosenberg wrote in the July 5 report.

'The Clement memo' refers to a document published by the White House and written by Paul Clement, the Solicitor General at the Justice Department, who must serve as 'acting Attorney General' for all matters dealing with the US Attorneys controversy.

Rosenberg wrote that a pair of Clinton-era federal court rulings, the so-called Espy and Judicial Watch cases, "arguably have effected important qualifications and restraints on the nature, scope and reach of the presidential communications privilege."

For instance, he wrote that "the unavailability of the information elsewhere by an appropriate investigating authority" could overcome an assertion of executive privilege.

In related news, the Washington Post's Dan Eggen and Amy Goldstein provided details of a White House legal strategy that would expand the scope of executive privilege. They write that the Justice Department will effectively order the US Attorney for the District of Columbia to decline to file any criminal contempt charges against current and former White House officials who refuse to comply with subpoenas based on an assertion of executive privilege.

The CRS report, which like all of the agency's publications has not been made publicly available, can be downloaded from the Federation of American Scientists' Project on Government Secrecy. (Presidential Claims of Executive Privilege: History, Law, Practice and Recent Developments, updated July 5, 2007 - http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/RL30319.pdf)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. And we are going to do what about this? Nothing! Just like
we always do.

These guys are so far over the line it is unbelievable. And we do nothing! Over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well then, who is going to bell the proverbial cat?
The Constitution sets out limits of power between the three branches, and it only means something if Congress and/or the Courts use that power of limitation. Otherwise, Bush IS right about the Constitution being a "worthless piece of paper".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Uh oh. I suppose now we can expect an Executive Order
shutting down the Congressional Research Service (for security reasons of course).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC