Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vick Indictment: Whatever Happened To Innocent Until Proven Guilty?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:16 PM
Original message
Vick Indictment: Whatever Happened To Innocent Until Proven Guilty?
All I see on TV and on the internet are people labeling Vick as guilty before the trial has even started. Have the Duke Lacrosse Case, Kobe Bryant case, and Ray Lewis case taught us nothing? I turned to Nancy Grace on CNN because I know she talks about legal cases, and I all see is this public slaughter over indictments!! It's more like it's guilty until proven innocent with some people...there is a such thing as due process. Now, if Vick is found guilty and convicted...then he should be punished for it. But I'm just wondering if all these groups like the Media and PETA will apologize for destroying his name and reputation IF he isn't found guilty (the answer is probably no)? Very rarely do you see these groups apologize afterward, they'll just say he got off because of celebrity status. I'm very serious, the mob mentality is disturbing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. As usual, best to wait until after the -trial- to pass judgment
But no one follows this maxim. It's in the news, people want to talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. You lost me at "turned to Nancy Grace".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Pappa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because the evidence is so damning.
And are you willing to give King George the same pass. Do believe he is also guilty of crimes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Bush is guilty because we KNOW what he's said in regards to the war
and Hurricane Katrina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Pappa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. You see its a double edge sword.
I "know" Vick is guilty because I saw those poor animals dead being taken from "his" property.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. How many celebrities have bought homes for people they know...
c'mon, no one has seen the evidence that he KNEW what was going on in that house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. If you buy a house for a friend, you give them a DEED for it.
Then it belongs to them. Not very many people, celebrities or no, buy a 5 mil house and pay no attention to what's going on in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Do you know any celebrities? And how they handle their affairs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Not actually celebrities, but I fly the airplanes owned by multimillionaires.
And so I travel, as it were, in their circles and know a bit about how they operate. Some of their names would be familiar to you I imagine, some would not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Pappa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. Sure pal
he just kept sending checks. Besides if it is in Vicks name, he damn sure better know what is going on in his house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:26 PM
Original message
What evidence?
There's a big difference between allegations and evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
27. Allegations don't come out of thin air, they are -based- on evidence.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Innocent until PROVEN guilty...have you ever heard of due process
Geez, you would think all people needed was an accusation to string somebody up without any rule of law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Check my posts. I have said repeatedly I absolutely embrace the concept of
'innocent until proven guilty'.

But when I see a big cloud of smoke, I'm guessing there's a fire somewhere nearby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
40. That's simply not true.
One can make allegations without having any evidence whatsoever.

You're engaging in the classical juror's fallacy- hey, if they're sitting in the defendant's chair, then they must have done something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. But this is an indictment. That means that
there has been an investigation, a grand jury has reviewed the evidence, and decided that there is enough there to proceed with a case. Not a guilty verdict, but not "no evidence" either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. I don't know... when I saw in the court papers that he'd electrocuted
Edited on Thu Jul-19-07 10:43 PM by hlthe2b
losing dogs he had forced to fight (for his pleasure) by throwing water on them and then zapping them, I just found it difficult to give him benefit of the doubt.

If the evidence is found to be bogus, my mea culpas will begin in earnest. Until then, I am simply too stunned and appalled to be more "understanding".

Like many here, animal and child cruelty are just too much for me to be rational about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Trust me, I'm not defending torture of ANY kind...
but an indictment is simply an allegation that NEEDS to be proven by the prosecution. That's the point of having a trial. The reactionary rhetoric I see amoung a lot of people when NO ONE has seen the prosecutions direct evidence put on trial is what's stunning!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. NO one is saying he should not be considered innocent until
proven guilty... I'm not advocating we get up a lynch mob. I'm saying I am not able to give him the same benefit of the doubt. The court of public opinion does not have the same burden for innocent until proven.... And, as I've already stated, I'm fully prepared to eat crow, offer mega mea culpas, etc. if wrong. But, I am a walking no tolerance zone for animal/child cruelty. It is not within me to avoid reaching any opinion whatsoever based on the court papers. In fact, I know deep in side that if anything could make me violent, it is witnessing that...

If you can continue to be so totally without impressions, opinions, bias, well, I guess you can feel good about that.... But, don't confuse people having difficulty with their private opinions in terms of "innocent until proven" with having the opinion that we should "bypass trial" and go straight to maximum punishment. I doubt many, if any, really believe that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's the horrifying nature of the crimes that SOMEONE in his immediate circle clearly committed.
Edited on Thu Jul-19-07 10:23 PM by karlrschneider
It's REAL hard to imagine he wasn't aware of this activity. But you're right, he should be accorded basic right to be considered innocent until proven guilty. The Falcons and NFL haven't handled this well, though. They should have sidelined him with pay until it's resolved...that is standard procedure in almost every other venue and it mitigates the inevitable charges of favoritism or coddling. Any time a cop kills somebody, in the line of duty, it's normal to take them "off the beat" while the investigation continues.

edit: By the way, how do you feel about the O.J. Simpson trial?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can't Wait To See That Fucker Rot In Prison.
I've seen more than enough in the reports to be convinced he's an evil piece of garbage that should rot in hell.

If by the one in a billion chance my deduction is wrong occurs, you have my word I'll apologize wholeheartedly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Is an indictment trial evidence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Of course it is...it's the -reason- for the trial.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. No it's not...
the purpose of the trial is to PROVE the allegations in the indictment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Which would not take place absent the indictment.
The -trial- is to convince the jury the charges coming FROM the indictment are true. It isn't really all that complicated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Oh My God! Did I Just Get Warped From My Chair And Into A Jury Box, And No One Told Me?
Aaaaaarrrrrrrggggggghhhhhhhh Where am I!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. So passing judgment isn't your role anyway. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Doesn't Need To Be. I Still Can't Wait To See That Disgusting Fucker Rot In Prison. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madspirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Have to agree with OMC on this...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. I read "Vitters"!
I can't keep up with all the Vs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. He says he didn't know anything about it - I will wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Well, he might be stupid, (I don't know) but I'm pretty sure he isn't dumb enough to
admit it before trial...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I didn't know who he was until the news broke and believe me
if he is guilty of what he is charged with, then I hope he rots in prison. Ya, I wouldn't think anyone would be that stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. I like football a lot but I'm not a fanatic about it...so I've seen him playing often.
He's a reasonably good quarterback but not spectacular IMO which isn't relevant anyway. I hesitate to say this, but he always seemed creepy to me for reasons I can't even explain. Just a feeling, you know? Kinda like how I see Cheney, that sort of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I hear ya
Sometimes you just can't explain a gut feeling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. I started to put it exactly that way but I remembered Chertoff's comments
the other day. Talk about internal conflict....yikes.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. How ironic, I was thinking the same thing when I posted.
Yet, I've read your posts here for awhile now and I would take your gut feeling over anyone serving in office, at any level.

Chertoff didn't have a gut feeling IMO, someone told him to say it to prepare us for the worst. :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Thanks, I appreciate that. I often piss off some DUers because I don't fit into
any particular niche...I try my damndest to be honest and rational. That gets me in trouble at times. :D
And I think you're right about Chertoff. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Well even if I don't always agree with you, I noticed that about you
I like rational and honest - the world would be so different if we could all be polite, honest and rational with each other. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. The report I saw is he has attended and allowed dog figthing for years.
So people have testify to the authorities that he is involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Pappa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
36. Innocent until proven guilty
is strictly for the courts. Not public opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Demonstrated quite dramatically by the O. J. Simpson trial.
oh, wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
41. So we'll give him a fair trial and then hang him...
meanwhile, fuck him-- they found 66 live dogs on the property after they busted the place on a drug raid, and there seemed little question fights happened on the property.

But he says he wasn't there much and had no idea they built all those fences and had all those dogs chained to truck axles.

Curiously, http://www.mikevick.com/ doesn't say a word about Bad Newz Kennels.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. It's the Ken Lay defense...
I run the place but have no idea what happens in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
44. What happened? How about dozens of slaughtered dogs?
Did the dog-fighting fairy sneak onto his property in the middle of the night and do bad things? Get a grip. He's the worst kind of moron. He shouldn't be in professional sports, he shouldn't be raking in mountains of money on athletic products, he should be in jail and not walking among us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC