Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In appearances promoting The Enemy at Home, D'Souza backpedaled from book's central conclusions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:06 PM
Original message
In appearances promoting The Enemy at Home, D'Souza backpedaled from book's central conclusions
In recent weeks, right-wing author Dinesh D'Souza has published op-eds in four major newspapers and appeared in interviews with all three major cable news channels to discuss his latest book The Enemy at Home: The Cultural Left and Its Responsibility for 9/11 (Doubleday, 2007). Yet in several of these media appearances, D'Souza has misrepresented some of the book's primary conclusions, understating and whitewashing his attacks on "the left." This pattern was most pronounced in his January 28 Post op-ed, in which he argued that much of the literary "reaction" to his book has been "a little hysterical":

D'Souza wrote in his Washington Post op-ed that he has faced an "onslaught" of criticism because his book "argues that the American left bears a measure of responsibility for the volcano of anger from the Muslim world that produced the 9/11 attacks." In his January 25 op-ed in The Christian Science Monitor, D'Souza asserted that Muslim distaste for the "popular culture" of "blue" America "can blossom into the kind of anti-American pathology that partly fueled the 9/11 attacks." Yet in the book itself, D'Souza does not argue that the cultural left "bears a measure of responsibility" for provoking the anger of the 9-11 hijackers or that it "partly fueled" 9-11. Rather, he asserts that the "cultural left" is the "primary cause" of the "visceral rage" that produced the terrorists who attacked America, and that "without the cultural left, 9/11 would not have happened"

In the Post op-ed, D'Souza also downplayed his endorsement of terrorist critiques of American culture, including in the purported "onslaught" of criticism he has received that "insistent" Comedy Central host Stephen Colbert "asked again and again" whether D'Souza "agrees with the Islamic radicals." What D'Souza neglected to mention, however, was his response to Colbert's question. Asked by Colbert on the January 16 edition of The Colbert Report whether he "agrees with some of the things these radical extremists are against in America," D'Souza replied: "I agree with it."

Indeed, D'Souza repeatedly refers to elements of the radical Muslim critique of American culture as "valid" and "legitimate" throughout The Enemy at Home. On Page 2, he writes: "The Muslims who carried out the 9/11 attacks were the product of this visceral rage -- some of it based on legitimate concerns, some of it based on wrongful prejudice, but all of it fueled and encouraged by the cultural left." Asserting on Page 21 that 9-11 was "a message" from Osama bin Laden and other "Islamic radicals" that the United States is a "repulsive sewer" and an "immoral, perverted society," D'Souza concludes: "Thus we have the first way in which the cultural left is responsible for 9/11. The left has produced a moral shift in American society that has resulted in a deluge of gross depravity and immorality." D'Souza asserts on Pages 122-123 that the "radical Muslim critique" of America largely relates to the belief that there is "no moral standard" condemning licentious behavior, concluding on Page 130, "It seems that there are none, just as the Muslims allege." On Page 131, D'Souza adds that the "Muslim case against American popular culture" is actually "understated" if one does not also take into account that America's "cultural depravity" is "actively championed by leading voices on the cultural left." He states on Page 119 that "the accusation of decadence against the West is obviously valid in one sense: Western societies (including America) are not reproducing themselves."

http://mediamatters.org/items/200702050002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. They don't hate us because we party...
They hate us because of our secret wars...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldemocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. If anyone caused 9-11 the Republicans did.
Bush should not have dealt with the Taliban in early 2001 and certainly should not have threatened to bomb them into the stone age and then ignore their threats on this country. Noooo but Bush had to say, ok now you warned me and you covered your ass, leaving America unprotected from the Taliban.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Exactly
Let's look at exactly what D'Sousa, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, etc. are saying with their crap. Muslims hate America because we are so open and free. They believe we should be destroyed because we are immoral. Yet, apparently they are completely unconcerned that the US has been treating them like their own personal gas station for 50 years, they could care ess that we depose their heads of state, they are completely unconcerned that we back Israel regardless of what Israel does, and it doesn't matter to them that we bomb them!

There are some really obvious things that the middle east would be mad at us for. Why do these fucktards miss them, and try to blame kids smoking joints as the root cause of terrorism? What a complete bunch of dipshits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yep the Sha of Iran was a Cultural Lefty all right....
The more controversial the more they like it. Means money for them plus exposure. He is no different than Coulter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. D'Souza is about as deep as a mud puddle. He lacks the creativity or curiousity
to really understand the underlying issues involved here. Muslims don't hate us for our freedoms.

He makes some outrageous claims that liberals caused everything, because he thinks he can sell some books to the knuckle draggers. When he's called out on it, in the daylight, just like any other bug, he squirms and wriggles his way out of answering any questions. He's morally and intellectually bankrupt. I'd at least give him some credit if he stood behind his claims instead of trying to softsoap it because he's scared of being "too far out there".

It was the best thing when I saw him on Colbert and he admitted that he believes in what Al-Qaeda says about the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. The check cashed, now it's time to rejoin humanity
D'Souza, ever since his college days, has found that he can get a lot of money for spouting this kind of gibberish. Unfortunately, the society into which he's so desperate for entree sort of frowns on the sort of blather in his book. So he writes the book to get the money to buy his position, then spends the time between books trying to deny he meant what he wrote.

I see him cracking up somewhere along the line, and it won't be pretty. Not that he's very attractive now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Wing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Since when did right-wingers care what a bunch of filthy muslims think?
The disconnect here is mind-boggling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. ...when it helps them bash "The Left..." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. LoL. Interesting isn't it? Remember how they get all worked up that we will
embolden the enemy with our dissent? I always wondered why we'd care what they'd think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nice
It's hard to know how to take Dinesh, but my gut tells me that he would be delicious. Then again it's right before lunch, so everything is kind of delicious. But my gut also tells me he's probably just cashing in, not serious in the bullshit he spouts - and this confirms it to a certain extent.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Uh, yup.
That's why during flight training in Florida the hijackers were known to hang out drinking in strip clubs.

To fuel their rage at American degeneracy.

Ah, yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sounds like D'Stort D'News-a has been unable to recover
Edited on Tue Feb-06-07 12:28 PM by rocknation
from the trouncing that Steve Colbert gave him.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. yes, some of them hate us for our liberalism
no question. fundamentalist religion cannot handle liberal societies. Yes, some of them hate us for our decadent culture, and our educated women, and our tolerance of other religions, our opportunities and our wealth. The answer to this, of course, is not to give up our decadent culture, our diversity, our tolerance, our opportunities or our wealth, but to change global societies so that those are more broadly spread.

Puritanism of all sorts cannot thrive in sunlight, and reacts with anger and hate (say, has anyone seen a thread about Johnny Edwards' house lately? it works all ways)

Hate is easy, tolerance is hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. If Dinesh D'Souza Represents The Best That Conservatives Have To Offer...
then they are dead as a movement. The established motive behind 9/11 was our military presence in Saudi Arabia, not Girls Gone Wild.

Radical Muslims hate anything that is also not radical muslim. They're not rational people. Hence the term, "radical". The same can be said of any religious or non-religious group that's "radical". A radical conservative like Mike Savage hates anyone else who is not as radical as he is.

You don't form a society or a culture to appease radicals. That's lunacy. More so, we aspire to live in a world where the individual has the utmost freedoms within the limits of its impact on the society as a whole. Yes, you can make a Girls Gone Wild video just don't use underage girls or force them into it.

If Dinesh D'Souza is saying that the conservative movement should adopt the radical Muslim agenda and abandon personal freedoms and liberties, then the conservative movement as we know it is all but over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. I wonder what he thinks of the Fox Entertainment Channel
shows that are a bit racy, that he attributes to liberalism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC