x-posted from LBN
http://www.sunherald.com/278/story/100408.html One by one, representatives of insurance companies lined up along a crowded testimony table Tuesday to criticize a proposal to create a federal hurricane coverage program before a House subcommittee.
Taylor says that insurers overcharged the NFIP (National Flood Insurance Program) for the property claims submitted by Gulf Coast residents after Katrina. Damage caused by flooding is covered by the NFIP, whereas insurers must cover wind damage under homeowners' policies. Taylor maintains that many companies took advantage of the NFIP, leading to the program's $17.5 billion deficit.
"Greed is the main disconnect in this situation," said Taylor, D-Miss. "It's easy for them to walk around in their Gucci suits and defend their companies, but the reality is down there on the Gulf Coast, where all of the destroyed homes and property of my constituents are. Of course, these companies don't want to change the rules that are currently in their favor. People who played by the rules and expected insurance companies to play by the same rules got screwed," said Taylor, whose bill would create financially sound premium levels to make the NFIP self-supporting.
"The proposal's actuarially sound rates still do not address the lack of flood coverage penetration," said Hartwig (president of the Insurance Information Institute). "It's not what will happen to the private sector, but what will happen to citizens and their taxpayer money."
Basically, Taylor wants the NFIP to add coverage for wind damage to the program. After Katrina, the insurance companies told people that the damage was caused by water, not wind, when in fact most of the damage on the MS Gulf Coast was caused by a "wind-driven" storm surge, i.e. the water would not have been there had the hurricane winds not pushed it ashore. By calling it flood damage instead of wind damage, the insurers were able to deny a large number of claims and skate on their responsibilities to homeowners.