Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FBI, DOJ Announce New Civil-Liberties Safeguards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 04:19 PM
Original message
FBI, DOJ Announce New Civil-Liberties Safeguards
Why should we believe one thing these agencies advertise when we know they're crooked?

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003680.php

FBI, DOJ Announce New Civil-Liberties Safeguards
By Spencer Ackerman - July 13, 2007, 2:09 PM

Ever since a March report by the Justice Department's inspector general highlighted mistakes made by the FBI in obtaining e-mail and financial records without a court order -- through what's known as a National Security Letter -- Bureau and DOJ officials have pledged to establish institutional safeguards against further abuse.

Today Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and FBI Director Robert Mueller announced that attorneys will form an oversight office within DOJ's National Security Division to examine "all aspects of the FBI's national security program for compliance with laws, regulations, and guidelines," according to Assistant Attorney General Kenneth L. Wainstein. Additionally, FBI will create an integrity and compliance office for internal policing over all FBI activities, which a DOJ announcement terms a "substantial innovation."

Time and further scrutiny will tell how exactly this will all work -- to say nothing of how well -- but Wainstein termed the move "historic." One question: will there be an office in place to ensure that Gonzales reads reports he receives about FBI abuse?

Additionally, in a letter to Vice President Dick Cheney and congressional leaders, Mueller and Gonzales noted that the FBI has just completed a "historical audit of the FBI's use of NSLs in all 56 field offices." The two say that it largely confirms the inspector generals' findings. We'll bring you the report as soon as we have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Time and scrutiny....
Yeah...and I would win all bets it will all go in their favor no matter what, and the public be damned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. I get the feeling we're about to be screwed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yeah. Because they always mean the opposite of what they say.
And they say it with such straight faces, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sure! I'll just put that in my invisible bank!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. "All 56 field offices." My, that's a whole lot of traitorous Americans.
Would they care to give us a ballpark figure of how many American citizens are committing treason by plotting acts of terrorism? A few of us? Lots of us? ALL of us?

Or is that also covered by executive privilege?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. In other news, Charles Manson has announced a new anti-murder initiative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Mistakes made by the FBI?
That's rich! And so the FBI "audited" itself and their own illegalities? How quaint of them. And now they're going to conduct oversight on themselves? Riiiight. I feel all better now. NOT! How about we keep it where Congress and the judiciary committee in particular maintain oversight...you know, the way the Constitution says it should be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. do "safeguards" apply to democrats and lefties
or are they only for those who have been "born again" or are members of the Republican party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm feeling safer already!
Yes! USA USA USA! My it is just grand to have all these fine folks overseeing my freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. So this means they are providing oversight to themselves.
If they thought their actions were right the first time around, how will they know they are wrong when they audit?

HISTORICAL audit makes sense. It's a first, for sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yep. What a joke.
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. Gonzo - the chief law enforcer - is a lying criminal scumbag. I believe them why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC