Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP Senators Asking for New War Authorization

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 01:36 PM
Original message
GOP Senators Asking for New War Authorization
July 13, 2007

WASHINGTON — Two leading Republican senators said today that President Bush should seek a new war authorization and present a plan to Congress by Oct. 16 outlining contingency plans in Iraq. Those plans, which would include reducing American forces, should begin by the end of the year.

Senators John W. Warner of Virginia and Richard G. Lugar of Indiana, both of whom have criticized the administration’s troop buildup plan, introduced a measure expected to be considered next week when the Iraq war debate resumes. The senators said it was critical to move beyond the current clash between Congress and the White House and begin making plans to be implemented after the military releases its progress report in September.

“I continue to counsel the president and his administration to move now to construct a more sustainable policy in Iraq that reduces our troop commitments and transitions away from the missions of interposing ourselves between sectarian factions,” Mr. Lugar said in a statement.

One of the main elements of their amendment, which was filed shortly after noon today, would require the president to seek a new rationale for the war authorization by the time Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top military commander in Iraq, delivers a report in September on the progress of the troop buildup. The measure also would require the president to review and update the National Intelligence Estimate for Iraq no later than Sept. 4.

“Many of the conditions and motivations that existed when we authorized force almost five years ago no longer exist or are irrelevant to our current situation,” Mr. Lugar said. He went on, saying the 2002 war authorization is “obsolete and requires revision.”

The proposal is one of a litany of plans offered by senators during a scheduled two-week debate over the Iraq war. But anticipation for the Warner-Lugar plan has quietly built all week, particularly among the Republicans who have called for a new course in Iraq. The senators said lawmakers from both parties have expressed an interest in endorsing the plan, although it remained an open question whether it went far enough for several Democratic critics.

The Senate was already scheduled to consider a variety of proposals next week, including one by Senators Robert Byrd, Democrat of West Virginia, and Hillary Rodham Clinton, Democrat of New York, seeking to de-authorize the original war authorization. That proposal, though, is not favored by the Democratic leadership because several senators who voted against the 2002 authorization are reluctant to endorse a new one . . .


more: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/13/washington/13cnd-cong.html?_r=1&hp=&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I knew Warner was going to be the Specter on this.
He pretends to support withdrawal only to authorize force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. How About Repealing The Old One...
Enough of this kicking the can shit!!! This is another stunt to give this regime cover and divert attention from making a serious attempt at accountability.

Now that the door's open...let's push to have a debate on the current authorization. Let's get an up or down vote on the supplementals. Enough of this obstructionist bullshit!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. right. This is just scrambling around for cover
and for a way to continue while claiming to want an end.

These two should be hammered with their hypocricy, but their objections should be used, nonetheless, as a wedge against Bush in the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Of course. Re-authorize.
And why not? After all we must sportdatroops. Why not? After all this bill will set a timetable (of sorts) so we must support it.

All those opposed to this clearly want the war to coninue forever. And they don't sportdatroops. Plus they are obviously against the warnterra. ninealemum. Al Kader. Freemom an mocracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Smells like bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. used to be september, now they want to shove it forward to october nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Lets hope the dems don't cave in for this shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. o there is a hope.
CS&N:
We are hopeless hopeless ho-opless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC