Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yes, Bush has failed in Iraq - but why did he invade in the first place?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 05:50 PM
Original message
Yes, Bush has failed in Iraq - but why did he invade in the first place?
http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=1&article_id=83631&categ_id=17

Two years after the editorial staff of the New York Times published a mea culpa expressing regret for failing to be more rigorous in its reporting in the run-up to the US-led war on Iraq, the influential paper has now finally called for the United States to withdraw. Citing US President George W. Bush's failure to deliver on successive promises of "breakthroughs," the paper concludes, "whatever his cause, it is lost."

Although this admission represents an admirable attempt to be more honest, the Times and other American media outlets continue to avoid one critical question: What is Bush's cause? To the people of this region, Bush's cause has long been painfully evident: to gain control of Iraq's oil resources. Indeed, ever since the US-led invasion of Iraq, the Bush administration has been aggressively pressuring the Iraqi government to pass a new oil law, ostensibly to promote "reconciliation" among the country's divided communities. In fact, Bush has made the passage of a new oil law one of his key "benchmarks" for Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's government. snip

The Americans invaded Iraq on the basis of lies that Bush concocted about Al-Qaeda and weapons of mass destruction. Now that Bush has completely shattered the Iraqi nation, he wants to deprive the Iraqi people of one of the only means they have to repair it. The question now becomes: Is this a cause that the American people can support in good conscience?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nominated.
We know "how" he brought the nation to war -- fear and lies. It's important to discuss "why," in order to find a solution to the hell produced by that fear and lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. why is easy
because he was told to by Dick and his gang. OIL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yep. Operation Iraqi Liberation. nt
Edited on Sun Jul-08-07 06:41 PM by tbyg52
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Might have been more like Operation Iraqi Liquidation
They pretty much liquidated the US too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. " ... He began with Prime Minister Blair, where the two discussed the ongoing aspects of ...
Operation Iraqi Liberation ..."

Press Briefing by Ari Fleischer
James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
March 24, 2003
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030324-4.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. And last week: announced oil & water resources going to corporations
= Iraqi liquidation

Hurry! Giant Liquidation Sale! Everything must go (private)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kicked and nominated. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Operation Iraqi Liberation (OIL)--plain and simple. A no-brainer.
This was a war that was whipped up by the corporations, touted by their very own media outlets, and managed by a bunch of evil bastards who know nothing of warfighting.

If there had been oil in Afghanistan, particularly round by Tora Bora, they'd have had Bin Ladin's head on a pike long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Definitely, for OIL
To ensure large profits for the oil companies, not so much as a supply for us users.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oil.
And they are very close to getting complete control of it... if that pesky Iraqi govt would just sign the papers. As soon as they sign, a 'miracle' will occur and the *cos will say, hey, let's start a pull out. The Iraqi are standing up so we can stand down, bladum, bladum, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Remember in F9/11 the part where the oil guys were carving up Iraq?
nuff said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yep.
Here's another vid to watch: The History of Oil and War http://www.brasscheck.com/videos/oil/oil1.html

Did you know that greed for Iraq's oil has inspired other conflicts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not enough of them got to orgasm after Gulf War I
So they've had a hard on for "finishing the job" practically ever since then. They felt cheated out of all the "bennies" they think they're getting now. I really feel sorry for the Iraqis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. To take the oil fields away from the Iraqis.
Didn't the oil companies put Bush and Dick in the White House to begin with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. Bush wanted to invade Iraq to show up his father and to gain political power
Two years before the September 11 attacks, presidential candidate George W. Bush was already talking privately about the political benefits of attacking Iraq, according to his former ghost writer, who held many conversations with then-Texas Governor Bush in preparation for a planned autobiography.

“He was thinking about invading Iraq in 1999,” said author and journalist Mickey Herskowitz. “It was on his mind. He said to me: ‘One of the keys to being seen as a great leader is to be seen as a commander-in-chief.’ And he said, ‘My father had all this political capital built up when he drove the Iraqis out of Kuwait and he wasted it.’ He said, ‘If I have a chance to invade….if I had that much capital, I’m not going to waste it. I’m going to get everything passed that I want to get passed and I’m going to have a successful presidency.”

Herskowitz said that Bush expressed frustration at a lifetime as an underachiever in the shadow of an accomplished father. In aggressive military action, he saw the opportunity to emerge from his father’s shadow. The moment, Herskowitz said, came in the wake of the September 11 attacks. “Suddenly, he’s at 91 percent in the polls, and he’d barely crawled out of the bunker.”

==

According to Herskowitz, who has authored more than 30 books, many of them jointly written autobiographies of famous Americans in politics, sports and media (including that of Reagan adviser Michael Deaver), Bush and his advisers were sold on the idea that it was difficult for a president to accomplish an electoral agenda without the record-high approval numbers that accompany successful if modest wars.

more -

http://www.guerrillanews.com/articles/article.php?id=761
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. The answer is a resounding NO...
otherwise, this will allow the Iraqi insurgency to take the moral high road, which makes us the BAD GUYS! Worse yet, Bush has successfully drawn Iran and al Qaeda into the conflict. While ultimately failing in the war, this now allows them to claim victory over the US. Since BushCo's ego can't handle that, the emphasis will now be to bomb Iran directly. The only REASONABLE solution is to expose BushCo for what they are doing and quickly work to repair the damage diplomatically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. K&R. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. That was always the cause.
And it appears there are millions of Americans that have no conscience about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC