Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fred Thompson's Watergate Problem

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 07:01 PM
Original message
Fred Thompson's Watergate Problem
The day before Senate Watergate Committee minority counsel Fred Thompson made the inquiry that launched him into the national spotlight -- asking an aide to President Nixon whether there was a White House taping system -- he telephoned Nixon's lawyer.

Thompson tipped off the White House that the committee knew about the taping system and would be making the information public. In his all-but-forgotten Watergate memoir, "At That Point in Time," Thompson said he acted with "no authority" in divulging the committee's knowledge of the tapes, which provided the evidence that led to Nixon's resignation. It was one of many Thompson leaks to the Nixon team, according to a former investigator for Democrats on the committee, Scott Armstrong , who remains upset at Thompson's actions.

"Thompson was a mole for the White House," Armstrong said in an interview. "Fred was working hammer and tong to defeat the investigation of finding out what happened to authorize Watergate and find out what the role of the president was."

http://todd_beeton.mydd.com/story/2007/7/5/16280/08207
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. KICK! KICK!! KICK!!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. A man who ALWAYS puts party above his own country...
He should be deeply ashamed of himself.:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Destroy Fred Thompson's run for prez before it get's off the ground!
He's yet another wooden-headed refucklican actor that needs to be taken out to pasture.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I second that kick...
:kick:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. he's a ratfink...
the usa (i mean all our western culture) has been defeated because men like this fred thompson guy got away with defying the public interest, for generation after generation crapping in the nation's soup! For example, bob dole, remember bob dole? he with the 'war injury' arm, in contrast to Big Bill Clinton? during the late nixon days, dole was called nixon's 'attack dog' (and this despite poor chuck colson running over his gramma for trickydick!) but at the time, the war in VNam was ending in spectacular disaster messy fashion, and WE knew about gulf/tonkin bs etc, so veteran status hardly helped anyone then, and dole never flaunted what 2 generations later he would- and in 1974 dole was a snarling punk threatening everybody in sight, yet he ran for prez as a 'moderate' 22 years later!)
it all comes back to the media. IF it's a pigmedia, then the earth is becoming a sty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here is the Boston Globe article, it is a doozy....
Not all would put a heroic sheen on Thompson's Watergate role






snip

Thompson, in his 1975 memoir, wrote that he believed "there would be nothing incriminating" about Nixon on the tapes, a theory he said "proved totally wrong."

snip

Thompson was a little-known assistant US attorney in Tennessee when the Watergate investigation in Congress got underway. He had served as campaign manager for the successful 1972 reelection of Senator Howard Baker, a powerful Tennessee Republican.

snip

John Dean , Nixon's former White House counsel, who was a central witness at the hearings, said he believed that Baker and Thompson were anything but impartial players. "I knew that Thompson would be Baker's man, trying to protect Nixon," Dean said in an interview.

snip

"Even though I had no authority to act for the committee, I decided to call Fred Buzhardt at home" to tell him that the committee had learned about the taping system, Thompson wrote. "I wanted to be sure that the White House was fully aware of what was to be disclosed so that it could take appropriate action."

more, oh so much more

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/07/04/not_all_would_put_a_heroic_sheen_on_thompsons_watergate_role/


If you take these two statements by Dumb as Hell:

"Even though I had no authority to act for the committee, I decided to call Fred Buzhardt at home" to tell him that the committee had learned about the taping system, Thompson wrote. "I wanted to be sure that the White House was fully aware of what was to be disclosed so that it could take appropriate action."

and

Thompson, in his 1975 memoir, wrote that he believed "there would be nothing incriminating" about Nixon on the tapes, a theory he said "proved totally wrong."


You can only come to one conclusion and that is: Thompson believed there would be nothing incriminating on the tapes BECAUSE he had warned them to get rid of the incriminating parts and any shock he felt was because the tapes weren't "cleansed" sufficiently.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Looks like Fred gave 'em the heads-up that led to the 18 minute gap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. If someone told you a cocaine-head draft-dodger
who failed at every business venture he tried would run for president, would you have thought he'd win? Fred can shrug this off - he's "The Law and Order Guy". /sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC