Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Armitage was THE leaker, BS!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 03:44 PM
Original message
Armitage was THE leaker, BS!
Romney replied: "This is one of those situations where I go back to my record as governor. I didn't pardon anybody as governor, because I didn't want to overturn a jury. But in this case, you have a prosecutor who clearly abused prosecutorial discretion by going after somebody when he already knew that the source of the leak was Richard Armitage. He'd been told that. So he went on a political vendetta." http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0607/4533.html

1). Armitage was not Novaks two senior administration officals.
2). Plenty of people in this administration were involved:


http://oversight.house.gov/Documents/20070316173308-19288.pdf

3). July 14, 2003, was when Novak article was published, the first time the leak was printed. Yes, Armitage was the first to tell a reporter this information but Woodward did not report it to the public. Thus, at the time Libby was disclosing Plame's name and status to reporters (beginning in June 23, 2003 - Miller) the information had not been made public.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. If 2 people rob bank, is only 1 person guilty?
No, everyone who leaked was guilty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Esp those that did so prior to the information being made public by Novak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. And that's just smoke and mirrors anyway
The same misdirection and deflection. Last I checked, just because someone did something illegal, that doesn't excuse you from doing something illegal.

I still want someone to ask one of these bozos what the difference between Bill's impeachable perjury and Libby's "eminently pardonable" perjury is. I'm still looking for Bill's underlying crime -- unless they consider committing adultery, in violation of the Ten Commandments, the law of the land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. They say that because that's what works for them.
If no one comes out forcefully and correct them, they will continue to say that. And I know Fitzgerald just shakes his head in disbelief everytime he hears a right winger repeat this lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Exactly
My McClatchey "newspaper" has been peddling the same thing. Armitage is NOT responsible for 20 leaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. MSNBC just had a libby aide on making this same arguement!
Krimminy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That f*cker Ron Christie. I'd like to smack him in the head till his eyes un-cross.
He tried it on the wrong guy though. Schuster, who knows that case inside out, smacked him down pretty good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
choie Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. and still the question is..
who requested the I & R report?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Armitage Revealed His Role In The Leak
3 months before Fitzgerald was even appointed and, yet the case was considered important enough that it was moved forward and Fitzgerald was given the dirty job. Furthermore, Armitage would never have even thought of Plame if Scooter hadn't started asking questions and writing memos about her. Every aspect of the leak leads back to Libby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC