Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

** Official EPA Ground Zero thread ***

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:01 PM
Original message
** Official EPA Ground Zero thread ***
Starting now on CSPAN3

http://www.cspan.org/watch/cs_cspan3_wm.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS3

How much will Christy Todd Whitman remember?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. thanks MiniMe
for the thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Opening statement by Nadler
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. The WTC is Nadler's CD. This is Very Personal for him! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think this is one of the reasons why she quit from the EPA, but I've heard alot
lately on NY news and she's still pimping for Bushco. She is though, pointing fingers at Rudy!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Condoleezza Rice signed the order.
Condoleezza Rice's office gave final approval to the infamous Environmental Protection Agency press releases days after 9/11 claiming the air around Ground Zero was "safe to breathe," internal documents show.
Now Secretary of State, Rice was then head of the National Security Council - "the final decision maker" on EPA statements about lower Manhattan air quality, the documents say.

Scientists and lawmakers have since deemed the air rife with toxins.

Early tests known to the EPA at the time had already found high asbestos levels, the notes say. But those results were omitted from the press releases because of "competing priorities" such as national security and "opening Wall Street," according to a report by the EPA's inspector general.

The chief of staff for then-EPA head Christie Todd Whitman, Eileen McGinnis, told the inspector general of heated discussions, including "screaming telephone calls," about what to put in the press releases.

The notes come from a 2003 probe into public assurances made on Sept. 16, five days after the 9/11 attacks. They tell how a White House staffer "worked with Dr. Condoleezza Rice's press secretary" on reviewing the press releases for weeks.

Whitman said through a spokeswoman Friday that she never discussed her press releases directly with Rice. She also defended her collaboration with the White House.

Now-retired Inspector General Nikki Tinsley told The Post her auditors tried to question the head of President Bush's Environmental Quality Council, but "he would not talk to us."

http://911truth.org/article.php?story=20061006200535746
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Why isn't Rice at this hearing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. They can't get her at any other hearing
why would we expect she would show up at this one? Not aimed at you IChing, but she already ignored the subpeona from Conyers for the pre-911 intelligence hearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I know but her responcibility is evident in documents
and she is not even mentioned.

I just wanted to throw out the info on who really signed off on it for DU readers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I appreciate that. I did not realize that she was the one that signed
Who knows, maybe her name will be brought up today. Then Condi can ignore another Subpeona.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. They know of the documents and hopefully her name will come up n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
54. What was the NSA clearing press releases for the EPA???
WTF???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #54
78. The "environment" is "national."
It needs to be secured and protected.

Enter Rice.

Sheesh.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Accusing her of violating due process of first responders
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. BTW Thanks for the thread. I am bookmarking as I have to go out soon and can't watch
the whole hearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks - Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Blamed the administration for covering things up
and to continue covering things up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nadler - EPA Air quality announcements were politically motivated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. FEMA refused to clean up personal residences
big surprise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. tuning in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. applause for Nadler
Edited on Mon Jun-25-07 12:18 PM by cal04
no demonstrations no applause
Yeah Conyers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. Conyers opening statement now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. there is something about Conyers presence that has a calming effect on me
Just to know that someone like him is on the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Yup. But it sounds like he is saying to her
"Be an independent voice today". At least that is what I take from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Tell the truth? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. It would be refreshing, wouldn't it?
I rather suspect another case of "I can't remember-itis" or I can't comment because of a pending lawsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Refreshing?! What is the truth? It's been so long... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
24. OMG, is Weiner throwing her under the bus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Oops, thought Weiner was an R. I should have known better
But he is giving it to her. Go Weiner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
25. you go Weiner
the air was NOT safe
rewrite the public record
cover one persons responsibility and blame another
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
28. Weiner is letting her have it
Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. She deserved every bit of it. She belongs in prison along with Bushco. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
29. are any Repukes there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. They said the ranking member was going to be there late
Not sure if there are any other repukes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
31. Here we go with her opening statement
the bullshit revisionist history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
32. shorter Christie: I did Everything Correctly--Somebody else's fault
Edited on Mon Jun-25-07 12:40 PM by librechik
oh, yeah, attack the terrorists. And I was badly informed. Somevody Else told me the air was ok.

What garbage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
33. Whitman is making her case that the EPA did warn the rescue workers.
I didn't like her tone of voice - it was a little defensive which makes me suspicious of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. There were residents that lived there too, who warned them?
She is being sued, part of the reason she won't implicate herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Exactly - and even though she presented a large "memo" - she didn't mention
Edited on Mon Jun-25-07 12:45 PM by file83
the number of memos distributed that day. Was it one memo? Who got it? How was it distributed?

A memo won't do anyone much good if it's sitting on someone's desk, so I'd like to know those answers from her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
34. There are people to blame
Edited on Mon Jun-25-07 12:41 PM by snooper2
The terrorists...she's not happy being here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
86. Dust to Dust My You tube movie on Rudy and Christine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1B2WBD-F-7I

There will be more people die from air exposure than the terrorists killed
if you worked in Lower Manhatten and have the 911 cough

WOrry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
37. How is OSHA going to explain this away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. He is ignoring the key focus of the problem: How did so many people get sick
Edited on Mon Jun-25-07 12:49 PM by file83
if OSHA had everyone using the "proper" respirators?

All he's talking about was the "success" of how few people got injured or died during the rescue operations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. they're obviously liberal fakers, ripping off the govt.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
40. September 18, 2001Whitman Details Ongoing Agency Efforts
Edited on Mon Jun-25-07 12:56 PM by cal04
EPA Administrator Christie Whitman announced today that results from the Agency's air and drinking water monitoring near the World Trade Center and Pentagon disaster sites indicate that these vital resources are safe. Whitman also announced that EPA has been given up to $83 million from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to support EPA's involvement in cleanup activities and ongoing monitoring of environmental conditions in both the New York City and Washington metropolitan areas following last week's terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

"We are very encouraged that the results from our monitoring of air quality and drinking water conditions in both New York and near the Pentagon show that the public in these areas is not being exposed to excessive levels of asbestos or other harmful substances," Whitman said. "Given the scope of the tragedy from last week, I am glad to reassure the people of New York and Washington, D.C. that their air is safe to breath and their water is safe to drink," she added.

http://www.epa.gov/wtc/stories/headline_091801.htm

White House Sway Is Seen in
E.P.A. Response to 9/11
JENNIFER B. LEE / NY Times 9aug03
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2003/Bush-Sway-EPA-911-9aug03.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
41. Whoa snap!! Did you see that 30 second clip of Whitman saying it was "safe"!?!
She's toasted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
42. Her own words ..........with video tape.....
Damn. She just got nailed by Nadler
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. She's all "...bu...bu...but I always qualified that statement with 'on the pile'!"
Ha ha - but what she doesn't realize is that "the pile" isn't the concern. It's the general area!!

Cooked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Nadler is calling her a liar with her "falsehoods"
She is getting cooked and Nadler is turning up the fire on the skillet.
Hopefully to where she is undeniable toxic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. She's bobbing and weaving....she's even trying to derail the conversation...
...looks like her seat is getting a bit uncomfortable.

She's also trying to pull a "Gonzales". "I'll have to take your word for it sir, I do not recall."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
43. Nadler just played back her own words
go to videotape please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
44. why can't the pukes EVER answer a
question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. Oh, they answer them...just not honestly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
49. I'm not going to go back 6 years to questions the scientists of that time
Um, that is what this hearing is about. What a bitch she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. She's not a bitch. She's a BushBot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
50. Christie: We were taking our own samples but...oh, I can't tell you."
!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. "With all due respect I can't imagine"
She just got caught in another lie that she said.
The air qualities were not what we said they were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
55. Conyers: How could they get to the workplace without walking through the street?
OSHA Guy - Blah Blah Blah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
56. Wait a minute - is this OSHA guy using hindsight that the tests were inconclusive?
Or is this something they knew at the time?

He's trying to use smoke & mirrors to disrupt the conversation. He's trying to suggest that their tests that detected airborne asbestos fibers, but those fibers were in fact "other" fibers!?

Umm...smoke and mirrors. His defense actually makes them guilty. He's trying to suggest that the tests were inconclusive (the fact that they couldn't "speciate" the source of the fibers), so then why did they say it was okay to go back!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
57. Repuke ranking member-Good faith effort of public employees??
Good faith effort???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
58. Conyers just sounded so apologetic for even having this hearing.
What was up with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
59. Conyers smacking down the BS being propagated by the GOP pigs
Edited on Mon Jun-25-07 01:22 PM by BushDespiser12
He is chastising them for playing politics (yet again) instead of trying to derive the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
60. Ellison is using her words again
This is getting into a fight........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. Oohhhh, nasty. That was a great exchange
She is using the usual tactic of wasting their time answering a different question, or objecting to the question and arguing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
61. Rightly or wrongly, she's sounding pretty defensive. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
62. Keith Ellison and Whitman just had a heated exchange!
She got so defensive and Ellison said he wasn't going to allow her to make this a "personal" issue for her, because it's "personal" issue for so many New Yorkers.

Good for Ellison!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
64. Whitman-"We had a website up within 10 days"
The damage had already been done you twit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. Now her and the Republican congressman are making fun of science and smirking.
Edited on Mon Jun-25-07 01:33 PM by file83
She just admitted that scientists can have many different opinions.

So why were her public statements on "safety" so firm & solid? According to her, scientists have too many opinions, so :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #64
82. and how many didn't have power and couldn't read her fucking web site!!
why did she not go on the news media and scream..its unsafe!!

fuck her!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
65. Are people dying of asbestosis?
Why the focus on asbestos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #65
83. yes!!!!!!!!!!!! and some have already died!!
but yoy wouldn't know that from our media!! or epa!! or bush government!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
67. Scott is leading up to something with his line of questioning
he is leading the witness having them agree ...I see something coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
68. the inspector general's report, they did not have sufficient data
The draft of the inspector general's report also says the agency "did not have sufficient data and analyses" to make a "blanket statement" when it announced seven days after the attack that the air around ground zero was safe to breathe. "Competing considerations, such as national security concerns and the desire to reopen Wall Street, also played a role in E.P.A.'s air quality statements," the report said.

The report, which has not yet been made public, is an evaluation of the agency's overall response to the attack on the World Trade Center. One chapter focuses on the role of the White House Council on Environmental Quality in helping to shape the agency's communication after the attack.

As a result of the White House C.E.Q.'s influence, guidance for cleaning indoor spaces and information about the potential health effects from W.T.C. debris were not included in the E.P.A's issued press releases," said the report, which was made available by people who said it was too harsh. "In addition, based on C.E.Q.'s influence, reassuring information was added to at least one press release and cautionary information was deleted from E.P.A.'s draft version of that press release."


http://www.mongabay.com/external/bush_statements_epa.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
69. This is about the letters that they got to reassure the public
and spin that the air was safe that came from the white house.
Paschrell is stating the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
70. Pascrell ,Give me a break!!!
Edited on Mon Jun-25-07 01:54 PM by cal04
she said back then she got extreme pressure from the white house
Mt. Sanai, the people are not making these stories up. The judge who handled the case was very clear. Deliberate misleading statements, she ripped her to shreds.
This administration has very little credibility
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #70
84. rudy's ass ought to be there too!! this was criminal and those in NY and NJ
have been screaming about this and the media has totally ignored it!!

i hold the media responsible as well 100%

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
71. more contractors
they protected the contractors and threw them off if they weren't wearing masks
they had so much security there why wasn't everyone wearing masks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
72. Love Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Asking specific questions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. she's terrific. First time seeing her
gets right to the point and knows what she's talking about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #72
75. Me too she is extremely precise, articulate and just plain rocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #75
79. You forget to mention...
Edited on Mon Jun-25-07 02:02 PM by file83
She's HOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
74. They need to ask what happened to that list of toxins she held up
Edited on Mon Jun-25-07 02:02 PM by rainbow4321
for the news camera.

In the days after 9/11. A news station did a live interview with her near Ground Zero. The list was on one of those legal size notepad papers that was filled top to bottom w/ a handwritten list of toxins that she said was at Ground Zero. Some station must have video of her in their archives. She held the list up to the camera for viewers to look at.

Ask her:
Who did she give the list to? Did she follow up on the list, get it into the right hands or did it end up in chimp regime's shredder?

She listed a few things from it, saying that even the average workplace/office had too many potentials toxins to list, giving examples like chemicals in the office copy machines...all of which were getting inhaled by people living/working in the Ground Zero area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
76. I hate softball questions...fluff.
They lead to answers like "The EPA workers were heros.....9/11....terrorists are responsible....blah blah blah"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
77. New Thread, Mods please lock
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #77
85. they didn't lock the last one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
80. The EPA workers are being undermined and questioned?
Once again, Cons can't handle taking responsibility. It's about YOU, Whitman! YOU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. It's very similar to the "Support the Troops!" rhetoric.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC