Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boucher blows hot air-His reasons for blocking CA emissions standards just don't make any sense

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 01:59 PM
Original message
Boucher blows hot air-His reasons for blocking CA emissions standards just don't make any sense
http://www.roanoke.com/editorials/wb/120254

Boucher blows hot air
His reasons for blocking California emissions standards just don't make any sense.



Rep. John Dingell's role in pushing a bill to limit the ability of California and other states to cap greenhouse gas emissions from cars is easy enough to figure out.

Dingell represents Detroit, after all, and carmakers are big donors.

But why is Southwest Virginia's Rep. Rick Boucher joining Dingell in pushing this bill, which is angering top Democrats like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and California Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein?

Boucher, whose district is home to the last vestiges of Virginia's dwindling coal industry, gets a lot of campaign money from mining and utility interests. It wouldn't be as surprising to see him playing the spoiler on emissions controls for coal-fired power plants.

But cars?

The legislation Boucher's subcommittee is drafting would prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency from issuing a waiver to California and other states that would allow them to impose more stringent standards on greenhouse gas emissions from cars.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Coal liquefaction. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. These guys should come out and live on the east side of Los Angeles
for a while -- out here with ordinary Californians. Then they would understand why we have to have high emissions standards. Our geography and topography require it. The air out here quickly becomes unbearable. Bush reduced emission standards for a power plant not to far from our house and we feel the change. Does Dingel really want to condemn us East Angelenos to increased risk of lung cancer and heart disease?

Dear Messrs. Boucher and Dingel -- this is a life or death matter for lots of Californians -- especially those already vulnerable to heart and lung diseases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC