Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WH December 2002 - FORGET THE TRUTH - Focus On Scaring The American Public

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 10:48 AM
Original message
WH December 2002 - FORGET THE TRUTH - Focus On Scaring The American Public
Edited on Mon Jun-11-07 10:49 AM by kpete
Foley in December 2002
“If the President wants to go to war, our job is to find the intelligence to allow him to do so.”


Forget the Truth
By Peter Eisner and Knut Royce

The Bush White House was never really preoccupied with the question of whether or not Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. It wasn’t until “late 2002,” virtually on the eve of the U.S. invasion, that the administration ordered the CIA to shift priority on WMD intelligence collection to Iraq from North Korea and Iran, according to an internal CIA report.

The administration’s belated concern appears to have been driven by two contemporary events. The White House at the time was narrowly focused on rallying public support for war by invoking the specter of mushroom clouds, and any supportive “intelligence” would be useful. That would also serve as backup ammunition to discredit inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency, reintroduced into Iraq after a four-year hiatus, if they were to conclude there was nothing there.


...................

Foley, for example, played a key role in generating the notorious “sixteen words,” the reference in George Bush’s Jan. 28, 2003 State of the Union address to Iraq’s alleged attempts to purchase uranium from Africa. Foley told National Security Council staffer Robert Joseph that it was perfectly OK: Just pin the intelligence on the Brits. Several months earlier the CIA had, only with great difficulty, convinced intransigent White House officials to delete a passage about the alleged uranium deal from a speech Bush delivered in Cincinnati.

.............

Yet days after Bush’s 2003 State of the Union speech, Foley told an acquaintance that he didn’t think Iraq had been rearming with banned weapons. Retired CIA analyst Melvin Goodman asked Foley what weapons of mass destruction he thought would be found in Iraq after the invasion. “Not much, if anything,” Foley replied.

more at:
http://tableforone.tpmcafe.com/blog/tableforone/2007/jun/11/forget_the_truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Alan Foley
from the TPM:

"At the same time, there has been not a peep from the man most directly responsible for the monumental intelligence failure—Alan Foley. Foley was the consummate CIA insider who managed the hundreds of WMD analysts at the agency’s Center for Weapons Intelligence, Nonproliferation and Arms Control, charged with tracking illicit weapons activity around the world."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why isn't Foley in jail?
Foley, for example, played a key role in generating the notorious “sixteen words,” the reference in George Bush’s Jan. 28, 2003 State of the Union address to Iraq’s alleged attempts to purchase uranium from Africa. Foley told National Security Council staffer Robert Joseph that it was perfectly OK: Just pin the intelligence on the Brits. Several months earlier the CIA had, only with great difficulty, convinced intransigent White House officials to delete a passage about the alleged uranium deal from a speech Bush delivered in Cincinnati.


That is illegal. A felony.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC