|
It was one of those neighborhoods of four to six story brick and wooden tenements. There was a certain amount of crime, but there was a tremendous amount of vibrancy as people crowded together in old buildings with few amenities learned to live together. Most were renters, slumlords having rushed in by the end of the Depression, buying everything in sight, making only minimal repairs, and using property as their cash cow, milking everything they could from it.
That was when the developers came in, waving cash. People were evicted and the whole West End was razed. It is now a bleak landscape of high rise luxury apartments called Charles River Park. It is an unpleasant experience to walk though, as there is little of interest at street height but guarded doorways to ugly, boxy buildings. It's as warm and vibrant as a moonscape.
That's what all this makes me think of, that "urban renewal" craze we went through in big cities 50 years ago that dispossessed people with so little to lose that some of them lost it all, just to make room for a few shiny buildings that would house 1/10 of the population at maybe three times the income.
Boston learned from that experience, learned that urban renewal that threw people out on the street and razed entire areas that had developed tremendous character to replace them with yuppie warrens that have developed no character at all in the past 50 years was not the answer. Massive highway projects cutting through other "slums" were canceled, and preservation became more important than redevelopment.
Undoubtedly China will catch on eventually, that what made their cities and culture great were the people, not how many shiny new buildings there are.
|