Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John McCain: 100 years in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:19 AM
Original message
John McCain: 100 years in Iraq
 
Run time: 00:37
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf7HYoh9YMM
 
Posted on YouTube: January 04, 2008
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: January 04, 2008
By DU Member: CGowen
Views on DU: 4671
 
David Corn asked McCain about his assertion afterward and says McCain told him American troops “could be in Iraq for ‘a thousand years’ or ‘a million years,’ as far as he was concerned.” Hey, why not shoot for a googolplex, Senator? You gotta think big.

http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/04/million-years-mccain-and-the-answer-to-a-stupid-question/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. CGowen
CGowen

And McCain believe that Iraqi, would welcome US presence in Iraq th next 100 year or more?.. If mr McCain had followed what is happening in Germany, South Korea and in Japan the last decade or so. Then he may had found that for the most part the majority in both this tree country want US forces out... Even in South Korea, where they for the moment need US forces to protect a hevely military trath from North Korea for the most part Korean want US forces out, right after South and North have agreed about how they want to live together then...

In Japan where US forces for the most part is closed in on one of the Islands, the japanese civilian want US forces packed more than anymore.. Because the armed forces of US have been treating the civilians for the most part as not that friendly, from the start go.. Specially after military soldiers have been treating civilians very badly, even raped and killed civilians, the populace have been rather angry forward american presence on the Island... (I don't remember the name of the Island exactly now, but it is pretty famous as the first Island on Mainland Japan to be occupied in 1944-45 when many thousands american was killed in the proses. And in Washington DC it is a statue, where american soldiers are planting the US flag on the top of the highest point on the Island, it was from a picture in Time Magazine from 1945, where american soldiers have planted the flag - 3 days after the surrender of imperial japanese forces on the Island then...)

And if someone in GOP really believe that US can stick to the ground in Iraq for 50 or more year, I doubt they had learned their history well. Both in Germany, Japan and South Korea for the most part US forces was accepted because of the treat from other country. Both Japan and West-Germany was threatened by Soviet military forces, and welcomed US armed forces when they was in deadly need of it. Now when Soviet forces are not exactly a menace anymore, and Japan and Germany for the most part can be on their own two feet, they don't need in same degree the armed presence of american forces. And if I dint remember the whole thing wrong, both in Japan and Germany US military pretense in the first case, was because Imperial Japan and Nazi-Germany lost the WW2, and therefore have to accept that the other forces for a Long time had armed forces on their ground... And mr McCain maybe don't remember that both USSR, UK and France was part of the occupied areas in what become West-Germany for more than 40 year... In fact i believe that both France and UK still have some Small forces in Germany, not as part of occupied armies, but as friends and allied for Germany...

And in both Germany and Japan many still respect armed forces from US.. In Korea they want them out, but understand that as long North-Korea still are a danger, they need more than the south korea armed forces can do. And therefore it is 35.000 US armed forces, and they are for the most part on the border with North Korea.. Where They have on both sides have been building for more than 50 year, for a war, who hopefully newer will come... And this border is the most hewe-ly defended and fortified place on the whole planet...

Diclotican

Sorry my bad English, not my native language
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. This time the US is building a wall and not Russia, if you want to
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 11:40 AM by CGowen
compare it to Germany


BAGHDAD, April 20 — American military commanders in Baghdad are trying a radical new strategy to quell the widening sectarian violence by building a 12-foot-high, three-mile-long wall separating a historic Sunni enclave from Shiite neighborhoods.

...

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/21/world/middleeast/21iraq.html





I don't really know what McCain is up to, with his friend Lieberman in the background
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. CGowen
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 03:01 PM by Diclotican
CGowen

Interesting.. Was not that a thing US forces used in Vietnam also, to no use because the vietcong, and the North vietnamese armed forces just melted away, and was attaching other places where US forces was not used to se armed warfare?:... Someone here once pointed that out.. It was not working then, and are not working now, because the civilian Will always be traveling and just not siting down at one place all the time..

And to try to stop the violence with walls have never stopped warfare... Maybe slow it down, but never stopped.. If US want to give Iraq the same Chance they gave Germany (Vest) and Japan, they have to come out with another plan than this... Some like the Marshall plan in Europe maybe?.. It Worked before, and the US industry was one of the group who get the most benefit from the rebuild of Europe.. Both in sale of almost everything a modern nation need, or want.. And in respect, because then America was blending the whole thing in i "we are helping the european to build their life after ww2".. And it work pretty well for the most part if I say so... Why cant the american use the experience from the Marshall plan when it come to Iraq... Or for the sake of it, for the Middle Eeast... Syria, Iran, and some other places what they need more than anymore is work, and thing to use.. That was the genie of General Marshall, who was getting a whole program named after him.. To rebuild, and share the surplus of american products.. From the newest car, to the simplest of thing.. And _that_ was given the european a generation of friendship to US, Not armed forces and out bombed homes and City's.. Maybe the generals, and the political leadership SHOULD have read the history of Europe from 1945 little more carefully?.. And not least, read their Middlestern history.. Then they maybe be in position to do someting?..

But then, we do have a totally incompetent administration who had a plan for the war, but NO plan for the time after the war.. They was believing that they just was roiling in, and then let iraq do it, and even get the hand of the oil.. And it backfired terrible, extremely terrible. I don't want to use bad language... But that is not easy, in English, or in norwigian... This Administration, with all its "geni" are just air and nothing else.. And the cost are for the american to pay....


And when have Wall stopped people to travel around in their own country?.. Should UN in New York try to block american inside walls, because in New York it have been a lot of crime and violence.. Even UN Representatives have not been unharmed from violence.. Should think what americans have say that, if UN want to block american after etnisity... This is not a receipt for anything than violence... And it was not working in the two germans either.. East german citizens was doing what they can to climb the wall who divided both germany and Europe.. Many was killed, many died, but in almost 50 year, east german and others was climbing over and down on the other side.. Regardless of what come next.. Freedom is a powerfully tool, and Will NEVER be dead.. Even in the hands of american armed forces..

To build this Wall around separating a historic Sunni enclave from the Shiite neighborhood is just telling the world, and the iraqi that the war is failed, and the are just doing something who maybe can dull the war down some... And it is telling to extremists that the thing they are doing, in fact is working.. Instead of moping up, and rebuild Iraq, they are using the money to try to protect them self.. Not Iraqis or other, but them self. We al remember when Reagan was telling Gorbatsjev in 1988 to "tear down this wall" to the sound of thousands of west german who really want the wall to fall. But to everyones suprice, the wall really was falling down, in 1989... I remember the totally suprice everyone had.. And the fact is that not even CIA or the other western intelligence apparatus have a clue, when the east german state almost collapsed in a few months...

When shall a another american president say the same word in Baghdad, separated in a generation or two.. That is what US are doing now, exactly what the russian was doing, to try to stop what was bleeding East Germany dry in the 1950s.. And it failed miserably then, and I am afraid it Will fail miserably this time around too... And this time it is not Russia who are the enemy of Iraq, it is the US, and it is not Russia who are the occupied party, but the US.. Even UK want to draw down the forces to a minimum, maybe even all british forces out of Iraqi all together.. And then US are alone, very, very alone in a country who doesn't want them there.. Even then they know that without the US forces a civil war Will come... But with the armed forces of US, a civil war Will come, but more silent and without all the "bang":.

And I can almost bet my paycheck that if US was to withdraw and Iraq was going into civil war, both Iran, Russia and US would use all means to get their "groups" to have the best weapon... And US have a lot of good weapon... And I doubt they had leered too much after Afghanistan, where the same groups who are now attaching american military forces in Iraq, was giving weapon even the US forces doesn't had.. Like the Stinger, who was given "freely" to the forces who was attaching the soviet forces in the country..

Diclotican

Sorry my bad Engelish, not my native language
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Amerikanischer Imperialismus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. whistle
whistle

And as in Germany, it wil fail, misrably... Not for US but for Soviet who was faling apart.... And I do not hope the same fate is to come to US...

Diclotican

Sorry my bad Engelish, not my native language
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nick_Irving Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Attention Democrats:
Attention Demcorat Voters: IRAQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWEmSKkuw10

see this video.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC