Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BILL GATES: ‘I’M GENERALLY IN FAVOR’ OF THE RICH PAYING MORE IN TAXES

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 12:14 PM
Original message
BILL GATES: ‘I’M GENERALLY IN FAVOR’ OF THE RICH PAYING MORE IN TAXES
 
Run time: 00:42
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCDF8y9xwuk
 
Posted on YouTube: October 30, 2011
By YouTube Member: ThinkProgress6
Views on YouTube: 9
 
Posted on DU: October 30, 2011
By DU Member: kpete
Views on DU: 1083
 
BILL GATES: ‘I’M GENERALLY IN FAVOR’ OF THE RICH PAYING MORE IN TAXES | In what is sure to irritate Republicans, the majority of millionaires (“job creators” in the GOP’s parlance) support higher taxes on the wealthy. Today on ABC’s This Week, Microsoft founder Bill Gates added his voice to the chorus, scoffing at the idea that the rich would riot over a marginal tax increase. “I just can’t imagine these millionaires and billionaires going down and barricading the streets because they are going to have to pay 4 or 5 percent more in taxes. I mean, it’s going to be rough for them,” he quipped. “There’s certainly a case to be made that taxes should be more progressive,” he added. When asked whether he agrees with the Buffet rule, he noted that the revenues needed cannot be raised completely off the top income bracket but he said, “I’m generally in favor of the idea that the rich should pay somewhat more.”

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/10/30/356718/bill-gates-im-generally-in-favor-of-the-rich-paying-more-in-taxes/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
They_Live Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmm. He was about to have a big butt
except it got cut off. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's lying
When asked whether he agrees with the Buffet rule, he noted that the revenues needed cannot be raised completely off the top income bracket but he said...

That's false. The "revenues needed" can easily be raised this way. In fact, well over half the deficit could be erased merely by letting the Bush/Obama tax cuts for the rich expire, and that's only a 3% increase in the top income bracket.

But that aside, what makes Gates or anyone of his ilk somehow an arbiter of what is good policy? The popular culture seems to worship people and anoint them as great sages simply because they're wealthy and, thus, must "know what's best."

Oh well. Having imparted his wisdom upon us, "Trey" can now go back to his modest house in the rarefied Medina neighborhood where there is no state income tax at all, and state services continue to be horrifically gutted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
They_Live Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good points.
+1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marazinia Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm impressed
I'll be convinced if these guys will also favor private money out of political campaigns and more regulation of 'corporate persons', including a corporate 'death penalty' with real consequences when corporations become malignant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam11111 Donating Member (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. $16 Trillion
Inclded as part of daily KOS

--------------------------
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nxY_tso8jLcJ:http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/10/04/789523/-Citigroups-Shocking-Plutonomy-Reports-h-t-Michael-Moore+plutonomy&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&strip=1

-------------------------------
The Wealth Report
Plutonomics
Robert Frank looks at the lives and culture of the wealthy.
By Robert Frank, Wall Street Journal - Jan 8, 2007

It’s well known that the rich have an outsized influence on the economy.

The nation’s top 1% of households own more than half the nation’s stocks, according to the Federal Reserve. They also control more than $16 trillion in wealth — more than the bottom 90%.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marazinia Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. This is the real base of their power
And we're going to take it from them. Let's not pretty it up. They've had their chance to create a prosperous and egalitarian society with that wealth, but they've instead used it to build more wealth, sucking it upward into the hands of a few. Wealth is power, and wealth is also not created from nothing. It comes from the labor, not of the %1, but of all of us together in society. Every worker they've ever profited from has the right to now say, "You didn't do what was right with the labor we gave you, and now we're taking it back."

I don't mind if the %1 continue to live in fine houses, drive fine cars, wear fine clothes. But they can't be allowed to control our economy, much less our government, anymore. And that means taking back the wealth that workers created and the wealthy consolidated. They have mismanaged it long enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Linux
I am definitely in favor of free operating systems like Linux.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC