Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Irony Of Chris Matthews

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 11:19 AM
Original message
The Irony Of Chris Matthews
 
Run time: 01:52
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4NWssVgFbE
 
Posted on YouTube: August 23, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: August 24, 2009
By DU Member: lame54
Views on DU: 5565
 
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/08/23/matthews-bloggers-fact-check/

Chris Matthews: ‘The bloggers don’t fact check.’
During a discussion on the future of newspapers and journalism on the Chris Matthews Show today, Time’s Joe Klein said that “on complicated stories, you can do this stuff on the internet.” Matthews responded by asking “who’s going to fact check?” As CNN’s Gloria Bolger began to answer that online editors would, Matthews interjected, “the bloggers don’t fact check.” “Nobody fact checks” online, added Klein. Watch it:

It’s ironic that a cable news host such as Chris Matthews would attack bloggers for supposedly not checking their facts, considering the amount of falsehoods and factually inaccurate statements he regularly utters on the air — which have all been fact-checked by bloggers.

Examples:

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/01/26/matthews-stimulus-china/

http://mediamatters.org/blog/200908040041

http://mediamatters.org/research/200908030025

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/31/matthews-coaches-delay/

http://mediamatters.org/research/200806160006

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/01/09/matthews-hillarys-winning-bc-her-husband-messed-around/

http://mediamatters.org/research/200704240007

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/04/02/matthews-suggests-african-americans-arent-regular-people/

http://mediamatters.org/research/200610120014


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Matthews gives a forum to Tom Delay, doesn't call him out on Forced Abortions in Saipan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SusanaMontana41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. Chris has had
a man-crush on DeLay for some time. He practically gushes when he interviews DeLay. Wish I had links to share, but you can probably find evidence on YouTube.

I think Matthews covets the power DeLay once had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. alerted
either pay to advertise, or take it elsewhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plantwomyn Donating Member (779 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
34. What's the big deal about "Forced Abortions"?
"Desperate to earn money and pay back their recruitment fees, some unemployed garment workers have found themselves turning to another lucrative industry on Saipan: sex tourism. There are no reliable statistics, but an estimated 90 percent of the island’s prostitutes are former garment workers."
Once "indentured servitude - forced prostitution and labor abuses" are the accepted norm, and "U.S. Navy sailors who frequent the club" fuel this part of Saipan's economy, "Forced Abortions" are just an end product of treating these woman as slaves-property and therefore sub-human.
We should be calling our government officials to address the proplem at the root.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
37. Matthews /Delay
Delay said he favors getting rid of Medicare and forcing seniors into 100% private insurance.
The most obvious question would have been: "Why didn't you introduce legislation to abolish Medicare while you were in the House?"
Yet that question never came...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. if truth got loose, the noose media its own victim
the lies are so obvious, so incessant, that ms news media no longer pertinent- indeed it acts as blocker to really getting a clear picture...of the vast defrauding of humanity by organised criminals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmike27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
26. A-men to that
hermano.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mustardman Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Matthews is an embarrasment
Used to watch his show fairly regularly but just can't handle it anymore. He has become just another out of touch old white guy stuck inside the beltway echo chamber. He loses all credibility by giving that fossil Pat Buchannan a platform on a regular basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSzymeczek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. The only way I'll watch Hardball
is if Lawrence O'Donnell is subbing for Tweety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mustardman Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. He's good when he subs on the Ed Show too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSzymeczek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. You're talking
O'Donnell, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mustardman Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Yup! Subbed for Ed last week I believe, or maybe it was the week before
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is Chris Matthews in any way relevant?
Chris is to information what the Insurers are to health
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. well put
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. in his own mind and on the northeast cocktail circuit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bushknew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. I remember when Tiger Woods had an injury & it was the lead story on all the news.
Edited on Mon Aug-24-09 12:18 PM by Bushknew
MSM is a joke.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Butch350 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. He shouts over and interrupts his guests when their making a point.

He been getting really annoying over the past year or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. And the corporate media for decades refuse to rerport on republicans lawbreaking & lies.....
Edited on Mon Aug-24-09 01:09 PM by LaPera
If it wasn't for some progressive bloggers and some dedicated independent journalist in the past, many of the republicans lawbreaking, killings & imperialistic endeavors would have gone unreported, unchallenged and completely ignored, swept under the carpet and still many have to this day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmike27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
27. Obfuscation is the biggest tool for deception
Well, that and the fact that the social issues are an area where they just don't give a shit. They'll show abortions, guys kissing, or anti-religionists, if it'll get them called liberal.

But on economic issues, even in the huge wave of unemployment we have now, not a hint of talk about rolling back some of the insane globalization, trade agreements, H1B visas, or a good immigration policy to stop lowering wages. In fact, they are trying to figure out ways to drive down the higher end segments, now that they've nearly destroyed the working class, middle class jobs.

And God, the MIC, the Pentagon deception is mind-boggling. There is such a chasm of non-information on the massive waste of the complex, the spending of the military, and the things we are missing out on when we spend a trillion a year on weapons. The Pentagon feeds them stories, and they repeat them.

Who made it our fucking job to blow up the world, to stop idiots from killing one-another, or for that matter, more accurately, to do the corporate oil companies bidding?

They never talk about how the money-changers influence our policies, how they thwart good progress of green businesses, to promote old technologies, like nuclear, and oil.

There is so much, so, so much they just simply leave undiscussed, quietly hidden. But, thank God, there is still the Internet, Hartmann, Rhodes, Miller, and Schultz, and a few other good eggs, though you have to look under some rocks to find them. Even Schultz is more liberal on the radio, and even liberal radio rarely discusses the MIC negatively anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Tweety (and I find his nickname an insult to the REAL Tweety)
Edited on Mon Aug-24-09 01:19 PM by Karenina
Is playing you for FOOLS and making a handsome living doing so. His "style" is emblematic of what's FUCKED in AmiHomeland. You LOVE HIM when he champions a cause near and dear. You HATE HIM when you feel he's busy drowning facts with his Schreierei. I can hardly bear to hear his voice.

The ironic thing is that so many who have been weaned on the Amurikan Way are so led around by the nose by Matthews and his ilk.
It's a visceral thang. I do hope some understand. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Chris Matthews makes a point.
Edited on Mon Aug-24-09 01:33 PM by JDPriestly
Some bloggers do original investigative reporting mostly in the U.S. One example is FireDog Lake. They have live-blogged a number of news stories, especially on various trials and investigations that didn't make the newspapers. But generally, bloggers rely on the same news sources that newspapers do.

And there is the rub. Once we were able to read AP, Bloomberg and other originating sources and newswires on the internet, many of us began to notice how often the stories in our local newspapers were copied nearly verbatim from the wires. So, we learned that the newspaper was sort of cheating: selling us warmed-over news.

Then, there was the seeming manipulation of the press during the Bush administration. The worst example of that was probably the Iraq War. Massive protests were not reported. Critical information on the fantasies that the Bush administration was trying to pass off as truth was not mentioned in major newspapers. And don't claim it was not available. The U.N. report gave Saddam Hussein pretty much a clean slate insofar as WMDs were concerned before the war started.

(Further, days before we started bombing, Dan Rather interviewed Saddam Hussein in Iraq, and Hussein credibly denied having WMDS. When that embarrassing fact turned out to be true, Dan Rather was fired. I have always believed that he was actually fired in order to discredit that interview.)

The problem for newspapers is lack of money. And that is not due to lack of readers. Rather it is due to systemic changes in our economy. In L.A. the big department stores used to vie for advertising space in the first section of the newspaper. The one or two stores that are still in business continue to advertise, but the revenue cannot possibly be anywhere near what it was before the late 1980s when the cannibalism of department stores by mega-corporations began.

Chris Matthews should not waste his time remembering the good old days. He should be asking where we are going in the future. And he should remember the story of the sons of tradesmen who, stirred by passion and equipped mostly with talent and the willingness to work hard and adjust to a new society, created not just good journalism and writing but helped create a great nation: Benjamin Franklin (newspapers) and Thomas Paine (news/opinion writing).

He makes a good point about fact-checking. Most of us here have not even finished reading the health care bills that are available to us. We read secondary sources and base our opinions on those. Ironically, most of those sources rely on newspapers for their information.

The fundamental problem is a rapidly changing economy. No one knows yet just what kind of economy we will have, but the free-for-all capitalism that was the dream of so many beginning with Reagan has completely failed. It has failed to provide opportunities for most Americans, and without opportunity and good-paying jobs, Americans won't buy newspapers -- or subscribe to cable for that matter. They seem like luxuries we don't need. The post office is suffering for the loss of first class mail. So it isn't just newspapers, we are entering an era of a different kind of economic organization. It won't be socialism. It won't be the kind of capitalism we have known. We are still just putting our toes in the water, but change is coming, like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unapatriciated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
32. but he is guilty of his own complaint
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chasitynola Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. Just a small comment
but every time I watch Matthews, I always think about how frightened I would be to get into a heated discussion with him. Reason being, he always looks so 'spitty' around the lips that I would be afraid that he would spray it...not say it! Am I the only one who notices his ample saliva production?

:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. I find it funny that bloggers are the ones who are getting the facts to "investigative reporters"
or that the "investigative reporters" routinely fail to check snopes ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. This simple minded man..
he still believes we are living in the sixties. Matthews know nothing about the internet. There are so many ways to fact check on the net.

That is what is wrong with him he thinks everyone on the left is nuts,thinks liberal on every issue and we are all put in one box. Then he portrays the right as the upstand,righteous and informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. Tweety never makes any sense when Tina Brown's around.
I think the diversion of blood flow from his noggin causes it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VPStoltz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. Matthew's should be treated for bi-polar disorder, schiz., multiple personality, etc.
Maybe a comprehensible human would emerge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. Let's be honest guys.
I don't count Tweety as worth much at times although I like him but I have to give him credit there. Overall bloggers don't fact check. More often than note. Yes I'd say thinkprogress and medimatters are better at it. But take for example Huffingtonpost who have at times failed. Most other bloggers are utter failures and they are pimped out by Foxnews. DailyKos and even Salon or Wonkette have failed in factchecking their information or putting out lousy stories. If we're honest we know he's right just as mainstream media has failed mor often than not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #18
33. the point is HE shouldn't be the one saying it because HE Doesn't check facts...
but he wants you to believe he does
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. Oh okay. I agree on that point. It is hypocritical. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #18
36. Huffpost, DailyKos and Salon? Really? NAME ONE INSTANCE where they were wrong.
Just one will do...

I Have NEVER seen them make a wrong claim or report, NEVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. YOU may NEVER have seen them wrong...that doesn't mean they haven't been.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8570132
Link to an article in huffpostin which the write is fairly misleading to the point of outright lieing.

DailyKos: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x556833#556986
Check out posts 19, 18 and the such. However their reporting on Palin and her 5th Child---of course through an unknown blogger also got them in trouble to the point where they were even called out by mainstream media.

Salon: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4042732
I was an Obama supporter, however I can respect when there are voting problems especially since I'm from a State with a dated form of voting which needs to be sorely replaced.

This s Wonkette: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8601142

Reporting a non-sense story.

--------------------------------------------

The point being is that, even if you've never seen it...it's happeend. Also all forms of news media get things wrong and no one is right. However, Bloggers tend to have no incentive to keep things truthful or accurate. My point is that Tweety is right in his assessment and in a lot of cases in many different blogs---bloggers are more on the getting it wrong side and in some cases not through any fault of their own but due to lack of access. In other cases they just get it wrong. But then, and I've said this before---mainstream media has gotten it wrong more often than not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyleA Donating Member (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. Lets not forget Iraq 2003
Matthews was a huge cheerleader for the occupation and predicted a cakewalk. Now he is much more progressive. He seems to favor which ever party is in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. Matthews wouldn't know a fact, if it hit him in the face!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stellar Donating Member (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. Matthews only to listens to Matthews.
There is no other view point but his. I don't understand why he bothers having guests on his show.

I've gotten to the point where I can't stand to listen to any of the MSM. And the newspapers are only good for wrapping garbage. When I do listen to some of the MSM/newspapers, I find I have to fact check them. Isn't that supposed to be their job too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
28. I will be sure to never watch Think Progress again if I can avoid it.
That was annoying, with everyone talking over each other and interrupting each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cartach Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
31. " He's the kind of guy you'd like to have a beer with"
When I first heard Chris Matthews utter those words about George W. Bush I just about puked. I thought at the time that Matthews was a typical brown nosing groupie whose admiration was based on people's star power rather than character,achievements,whatever. I had not watched the talking heads much prior to 9/11 but after that tragedy I started regularly watching them and soon formed an opinion about Matthews which hasn't changed in the years since. I have never felt any urge to put people on pedestals just for the sake of having hero figures in my life and those that do turn me off. I figure that people have to earn my respect and that will only come from the type of people they really are.I might be fooled some of the time but not often. If someone wants to slobber over some high profile person they shouldn't be doing it on the type of program Hardball is supposed to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC