Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EPA Fails To Inform Public About Weed-Killer In Drinking Water

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 05:46 AM
Original message
EPA Fails To Inform Public About Weed-Killer In Drinking Water
 
Run time: 06:22
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iJQvrEOIjU
 
Posted on YouTube: August 24, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: August 24, 2009
By DU Member: indimuse
Views on DU: 1283
 




One of the nation's most widely-used herbicides has been found to exceed federal safety limits in drinking water in four states, but water customers have not been told and the Environmental Protection Agency has not published the results.

Records that tracked the amount of the weed-killer atrazine in about 150 watersheds from 2003 through 2008 were obtained by the Huffington Post Investigative Fund under the Freedom of Information Act. An analysis found that yearly average levels of atrazine in drinking water violated the federal standard at least ten times in communities in Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Kansas, all states where farmers rely heavily on the herbicide.

In addition, more than 40 water systems in those states showed spikes in atrazine levels that normally would have triggered automatic notification of customers. In none of those cases were residents alerted.

Continue here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/23/epa-fails-to-inform-publi_n_266686.html




Poison our food!
Poison our water!
Poison our BRAINS! (well..the RW!)
AND a BIG F*CK NO to HeathCare! Sick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is an ongoing controversy covering the past 20 years.
What exactly did EPA fail to tell people about atrazine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That they were drinking it in large quantities that could make them sick or kill them.
That's all , not important, move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Did you read the report??
10 TIMES the amount!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. Just checked our city's water report...
Here in the heart of the Illinois corn belt, Atrazine is not on the list of reported items. I am thinking I am calling our water department today. Thanks for the headsup!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Good for you.
This is unacceptable!


and your welcome. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagertolearn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. When we lived in Porterville, CA. in the middle of an orange orchard
the house owners told us they would pay for bottled water because our water was contaminated with pesticides (we had a brand new baby so I think that was the only reason they told us). When we had the local water testers come out and test our water to see what was in it they told us that each area picks several chemicals to test for (I think they said they relied on the farmers telling them what they used the most) otherwise there are probably other substances in the water that don't show up because they are not tested for. What if farmers don't report all that they are using? Interesting that the farming chemicals have been used for over 50 years now and the cancer rates and other diseases related to the imune system have gone up. What about Autism? Our exposure to chemicals is tremendous and I believe they build up in our bodies. Again an example of big industry winning over because of the money involved. I used to think our government was watching out over us and it was so sad when I realized not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. And don't think that drinking bottled water saves you
toxins like this are easily absorbed through the skin. How big a dose does one human get during a typical shower?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. ugh..
i didn't even think of that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. The EU banned it in 2004 already. They are not taking chances with lives.



...........Studies of atrazine's potential links to prostate and breast cancer have been inconclusive. Based on the recommendations of its scientific advisory panels in 2000 and 2003, the EPA has listed atrazine as "not likely" to be a carcinogen but does officially consider it to be a potential hormone disruptor - a risk factor explored by researchers testing animals.

In recent years atrazine has been the subject of intensive debate among scientists about its effects on the reproductive systems of frogs and other vertebrate animals. In some studies, male frogs that were exposed to high levels of atrazine have been documented to grow eggs.

In 2004, the European Union banned atrazine because it was consistently showing up in drinking water and health officials, aware of ongoing studies, said they could not find sufficient evidence the chemical was safe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagertolearn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. thanks for the video. A good organization for more resources about alternatives to pesticides is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. you are most welcome.
and thank you for the link, as well- I will check it out later. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
10.  A few notes of interest:
  1. The drinking water standard for atrazine used to be around 45 ppb. Just about every drinking water source was considered safe. In the late 1980s, the EPA proposed and later adopted a 3 ppb limit, and out-of-compliance drinking water suddenly became common.
  2. Atrazine is detectable in nearly all drinking water in the corn belt, particularly for water taken from alluvial aquifers.
  3. The US EPA was quite open and diligent about report atrazine in drinking water for the decade of the 1990s, but things took a radical change when the Bush administration removed a lot of money for enforcement from EPA's budget.
  4. A simple change in enforcement would have an enormous impact on the amount of atrazine showing up in drinking water.

It all starts with education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. thank you
that will help me when I talk to our city water guy tomorrow. He's not in today and I will be doing a little research tonight to I don't sound like I'm gunning for him. He may not know this stuff either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. One Grain of Salt from the Salt Shaker in an average Swimming Pool is 1 PPB.
Thimerosol, the Ethyl Mercury based preservative used in many vaccines and opthalmic phrmaceutical (Including Contact Lense Cleaning Solution) is toxic to human cells at 10 PPB.

Getting back to farming, I remember visiting Big Farms in the Central Valley of California in the mid eighties. I recall seeing huge piles of 5 empty 5 gallon containers of pesticides, herbicides and other chemicals just laying out in the open. I took note of it then, and just imagined how toxic these areas must be, and it was no wonder that the yards were deserted most of the time.

100's of acres without a single tree, or shade for that matter. Ditches full of pea soup green water. Not a frog to be seen, and on rare occasions, some flies. It was interesting to see the number of bugs at night, attracted from miles away to the Lamps used in the harvesting operations, and watching the bats feasting on these pesticide laden insects.

It was that experience in the 80's that turned my stomach away from modern "Generally Recognized Agricultural Practices" which are the only methods that are able to get any sort of Agricultural Loan from the USDA and other lenders. I decided in 1998 to move toward organic production, Integrated Pest Management, manual and natural weed control, cover crops, and most of all, trees.

I never use fire to burn debris anymore. I prune and drop the branches at the base of the trees, and then grow crops on them as a natural, trellis, which shades the soil, prevents the growth of weeds, and ultimately breaks down a returns to the soil. I don't till the soil anymore, except for when I transplant something, and only in the immediate root bowl. I have not used any fertilizers or chemicals of any kind, other than Yellow Jacket lure in the traps for the meat bee's, or Fruit Fly Pheromone to trap Fruit Flies. I monocrop in small groves, widely dispersed wmong other groves, just like you would find in a forest, with the grandfather and grandmother trees sheltering their offspring.

I have no dust, except for pollen from the canopy overhead.

In today's society, food seems so plentiful, that it has lost it's value, forcing farmers into this false idea that more crops will earn more money. What a complete fallacy. All they do is create more crops without increased demand, which is the definition of INFLATION of the supply of their product. They INFLATE the availability of the crops they produce, forcing the price down and creating a greater loss. This is basic supply and demand.

They no longer question whether their product is worth anything, or is as nutritious as the Wormy Apples, or the reduced yield of a field of corn with reduced yield.

I am surrounded by farmers that still use the "Modern" methods of agriculture. They are now "Registered Pesticide Applicators", because they have been invaded with new weeps that are immune to RoundUp. They have graduated to Paraquat and 2,4-D, and Atrazine. Surprisingly, they complain that The Patriot Act forced them to become registered due to the extreme toxic compounds they are able to purchase.

Fortunately, I am surrounded by a huge buffer zone of native forest so I am at least somewhat protected from pesticide drift, but I have to assume that the groundwater is pretty much contaminated, as well as rainwater catchment.

These chemicals are a sham. What's wrong with a little labor intensive crop production? Although Farming can be hard work, farmers make it harder through the dependance on Monocrop production, forcing brief periods of forced labor. You won't get rich farming.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ro1942 Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. thanks
for posting this cheap corn is killing everything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC