|
Nothing is certain my friend, you must weigh everything and come to your own conclusions. So lets weigh in:
There is obviously an upset crowd throwing rocks and you hear gunfire. If it is a "false flag" then they are some hired actors of middle eastern decent who are willing to help the USA and the CIA to mislead other middle eastern people. It must have been difficult to find these callous actors, and what to do about, and keep quiet, the ones that they auditioned and that refused to participate? Also if they went to all the trouble of setting this up, you'd think they could at least show more of the crowd, and the police etc. to get the full effect, don't you think, rather than mostly focus on the injured man?...(although he is doing a superb job at keeping absolutely limp all covered in fake blood, while being dragged around the street).
You say it is a false flag operation, and then tell us it may just be a film of "generic crowds of people of Muslim descent that could be in any number of countries in the world" What other middle east countries are now protesting/rioting in the streets? Do you think they do this all the time in Muslim countries? And if it was footage from say last years Gaza invasion, don't you think this footage would have not gotten out sooner and been used for THAT conflict for their own needs of propaganda? And of course they would also be able to edit in the time and Arabic text.
And what pray tell is the evil objective of this false video being released? To destabilize Iran and cause unrest as you claim? You sure do not give the people of Iran much credit. So they would have meekly accepted the results if it wasn't for YouTube and Twitter?
Explain this logical loop: In order to be influenced by YouTube videos they would have to be a modern enough nation, and young enough, to be internet savy and have cell phones and computers, which by all accounts they are. Ok, then they also must be able to use those same social networks and take videos themselves right? So which ones are the "false flags" and which ones are the real ones? And why would the CIA spend money creating fake ones when the people of Iran are making them up for them for free?
So any footage (The more amateur the more suspicious) that we get from areas of turmoil are not to be trusted? So much for the internet empowering truthseekers. If I didn't know any better I'd think you work for CNN. Which is another point. The "Western Media" is only stealing footage from the social networks on the internet, how is it in their control? Ah unless all the media companies together with the CIA and vast groups of green clad middle eastern actors are all working together..hmmm maybe you're right...
And the last point: Even if its all one big conspiracy to cause unrest in Iran, what is the purpose? To entice the population to rise up and install a more moderate, less antagonistic leadership? The end, if not the means, would be a good thing no?
I'm sorry but your assertions are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay off the deep end. If I lived in your world, the Tianamen Square stand-off never happened, the pictures at Kent State were fake, and the moon walk was a concoction.
|