Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain's Lack of Eye Contact: A Sign of Contempt?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:27 AM
Original message
McCain's Lack of Eye Contact: A Sign of Contempt?
 
Run time: 01:31
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ty9BTcERiYY
 
Posted on YouTube: September 27, 2008
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: September 27, 2008
By DU Member: babylonsister
Views on DU: 2386
 
MSNBC's Chris Matthews and Washington Post's Eugene Robinson discuss why McCain never looked at Obama during the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think it is more a sign that mcPOW is ashamed about his behavior.
He can't look Obama in the eye because he knows he's been out there lying everyday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Could be, but I have no sympathy. He crafted his own campaign,
it stinks, he should be ashamed. He lost all semblance of a decent man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frisbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. There was a time when...
McCain was an honorable man I happened to disagree with more often than not. Those days are LONG gone, and now he is nothing more than a typical republican politician who says anything to get (re)elected with no regard for the truth or who he has to destroy to achieve his objective. What a sorry excuse for a candidate this once principled man is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldie999 Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. McCain showed that he is just a grumpy, mean old man
And those stories he told. Everytime he started to tell one, I thought, "here we go again."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LatteLibertine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. I feel
Edited on Sat Sep-27-08 10:48 AM by LatteLibertine
behaving in this manner makes it seem as if you are afraid of the person you are debating and/or you don't truly believe in the positions you are putting forth. It's non dominant behavior. McCain seemed far more interested in the moderator and basically conducting an interview as opposed to a real debate. McCain looked like a rehearsed shell of a politician that simply didn't want to be there. Some of McCain's answers were good and that didn't make up for the empty disingenuous delivery.

Senator Obama was quite the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's the sign of fear.
Big Angry Black Man.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLALady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
28. Seems like fear to me.
Fear of an intelligent, educated opponent who happens to be Black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. OK, it's one view I prefer it was shame at McCain's slezy campaign against a self evident good man>
Edited on Sat Sep-27-08 10:46 AM by barack the house
like Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peggesis1 Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. It was unnerving
I think it was meant to show profound disrespect for Senator Obama and was also meant to be unnerving for him. If you've ever been in a discussion or argument with someone who refuses to look at you, who smirks and shakes his head when you speak, and then speaks about you to a third person in your presence, you know how stressful it is to deal with a person behaving like McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetroxie Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I agree. It was unbridled contempt
He figured this guy should be shining HRH's $500 shoes and not sharing the platform and debate with HRH McCancer. What a scumbag!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MCCAIN AND A PIT BULL---
1) pitbulls don't lie
2) pitbulls don't believe in TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS unless you have a leg up against a poll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm not going to speculate on the psychology
but I think it's one reason low information voters think Obama won.

Obama looked calm, comfortable, and honest, willing to look his opponent in the eye. Magoo looked old, testy, tired, and shifty, unwilling to look his opponent in the eye.

That's how these people decide who they're going to vote for, whether we like it or not. They don't listen to content much. They do pay attention to what the feller's all about and they know Obama would give 'em a good deal while Magoo would sell 'em a clunker at top dollar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoopersMom Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
9. Beta animals don't look Alpha animals in the eye
It's considered a challenge by the lower ranking animal to the alpha animal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. You got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Blue Flower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. I thought it was because of the lies
I thought it was because he knows he's been lying and smearing a colleague who doesn't deserve such treatment. But I agree that it's also because he knows who the better, stronger man is (as opposed to the shrunken-souled, lying weasel).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmac Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. He had to keep his eyes on his notes
and also; since rethugs are racist to the core; it was contempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. "WHAT IS THAT ABOUT?"
You gotta love Tweeety sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ciking724 Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. Two reasons McCain would not look at Obama
1) McCain is intimidated by Obama; he is clearly out of his league. 2) If he turned his head, he would have exposed the electronic listening device in his right ear through which he was being cued to the correct pre-printed response on the papers he was looking down at on the podium.

McCain also kept going over his time; he talked right through the moderator signaling to him that his time was up, which indicates that he was listening to someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Their improving their technology in leaps and bounds. Pity about the
Edited on Sat Sep-27-08 01:32 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
lack of political nous of their human resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Ervin jret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. McCain has to vilify his opposition in order to "win." Everything is war with this guy. That
includes this his last effort to get the position he has so wanted his entire political life.

Looking at Obama would dull what McCain feels is his biggest strength - his killer instinct. Winning in war is everything. He has said so himself. There is no honorable way to end a war other than to defeat the "bad guys." This he pointed out in his discussion about the bracelet he was wearing.

I think the story about the bracelet and his language surrounding this issue is an opportunity for people to explore the thinking of John McCain. According to the story, McCain wears this piece so that the soldier will not have died in vain. According to McCain this young person who did everything that was asked of him by his country and his conscience and who died in the line of duty is still in jeopardy of having died in vain. He doesn't make to the full hero group unless we "win" the war in Iraq.

What does this say about John and what does it mean for our country if he becomes president? All the men who died in Vietnam and Korea have died in vain because we did not "win" those wars. Any future combat involving McCain as Commander and Chief must continue until "we win." There is no honorable way to end a war without "winning." In McCain's mind Eisenhower made a big mistake when he stopped the Korean war without a victory and leaving Vietnam without a clear victory was dishonorable. Is this how we want our President to think? Is this representative of most people's views? Are we ready to stay in Georgia until we defeat Russia?

Both men got bracelets from mothers of fallen soldiers and both took separate messages away from the encounter. McCain took away the message that he must fight to clear the shadow over the honor of this young soldier. He must "win the war in Iraq"(definition of that expression as yet unknown) because of this shadow. If we don't continue to fight in Iraq until "we win" that shadow will follow this soldier's honor as it has followed the honor of all the soldiers of "non-winning wars" in American history. Like the one that haunts John McCain.

Obama took away the message of responsibility and consequences. As commander and chief the authority to put others lives at risk comes with the responsibility to make sure decisions made are made with the understanding of the full impact of the consequences of those decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Exactly.
Can you imagine how diplomatic negotiations would go if he, as president, were to vilify his opponent before picking up the phone or sitting down to meet with someone? Yikes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
red storm Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. Eye contact - McCain didn't have the nerve
He could not look at Obama because it would have cracked his fake armor. The ONLY way McCain believed he could beat Obama was to appear to be "aloof" but it only came across as him being a contemptuous old fool.

We do not need another fool in the White House the current one is more than enough.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsCorleone Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. McChicken's inability to address Obama directly was clearly due to insecurity, IMO.
He reminds me of Bush. Many believe Bush possesses an arrogant swagger. I have always disagreed with this notion. To me, Bush has always appeared incredibly uncomfortable in his own skin, acutely aware of that all eyes (& cameras) are upon him, judging him. He clearly struggles to appear worthy.

McChicken's lack of eye contact, coupled with his simmering frustration, betrays his own feelings of worthiness.

The media will try to spin this as being some sort of deliberate political tactic by McChicken, but it is what it is, IMO.

In short, McCain is a puss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
23. treats opponent as enemy, "personalizes conflict" "demonizes enemy"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. Even though McCain is 72, it made him look immature, childish, petty.
I say, keep it up, John. You're doing yourself no favors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
25. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. Maybe his makeup
was going to crack off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
27. I didn't think it looked like contempt. To me it seemed to reflect
profound discomfort with the whole situation. I think McCain is ashamed and frustrated about his entire campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
29. Not contempt, but anger because Obama had stuffed him at the Bailout meeting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC