Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Viewpoint: Let’s Stop Avoiding Our Best Tactic—The Strike

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 08:00 PM
Original message
Viewpoint: Let’s Stop Avoiding Our Best Tactic—The Strike

http://labornotes.org/2010/04/viewpoint-lets-stop-avoiding-our-best-tactic-the-strike

Joe Burns April 20, 2010


Hotel workers’ 2004 strike against San Francisco hotels included 24-hour picketing, a boycott, community rallies, and civil disobedience. Photo: David Bacon | dbacon.igc.org

As unionists search for ways to resolve labor’s ongoing crisis, virtually ignored is the one tactic with a proven ability to produce major gains—an effective strike. After two decades of avoiding the question, it’s time to face the reality of what it will take to rebuild the labor movement.

For generations the ability to strike—and halt the employer’s production—was the essence of unionism. During the heyday of American unions, from the 1930s to the 1970s, workers secured real wage gains, pensions, and employer-paid health care through hard-nosed collective bargaining backed by workplace-based solidarity and a powerful strike.

But today unions have virtually abandoned the strike. There were only five strikes last year of 1,000 workers or more, three of them among public employees, as opposed to at least 200 major strikes per year in the 1970s.

The reason is clear. Today’s version of the strike—which is very different from the traditional strike—makes no economic sense. In a typical strike today, workers set up a picket line only to watch the scabs walk past to take their jobs.

In contrast, traditional unionism was based on commonsense economics—on the notion that a strike must make an employer’s pocketbook bleed. Merely withdrawing labor cannot work for most striking workers, since employers typically have no difficulty hiring scabs. Yet for more than two decades the idea that striking workers need to stop production has been treated as a fringe idea within the labor movement.
SOLIDARITY WORKED

Labor’s other main tool was workplace-based solidarity. Whether it was expanding picket lines to an entire industry, refusing to handle scab-produced goods, or pressuring a rogue employer by choking off its supply or distribution chain, solidarity was a key union tactic.

Solidarity allowed workers to act as a class, rather than as one isolated shop at a time. These workplace-based solidarity actions were banned in the 1947 Taft-Hartley law precisely because they were so effective.

FULL story at link.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are strikes more or less effective when unemployment/underemployment is double digit for jobs that
are not highly skilled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am retired now but was in two major strikes in my lifetime
Edited on Sun May-09-10 08:52 PM by doc03
both times we came back for less than the company offered us the day it began. As soon as the strike starts the company gets a court order limiting pickets at the gate, you are prohibited from stopping anyone even scabs that want to enter the plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Our best tactic is the vote. Striking may increase public awareness...
...thereby generating votes, but stikes cause a lot of pain as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth Bound Misfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Unfortunately, mgmt will employ THEIR best tactic--
permanent replacement workers.

Thanks, "St. Ronnie"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC