Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: (The Safety Net) Contesting Jobless Claims Becomes a Boom Industry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 06:51 PM
Original message
NYT: (The Safety Net) Contesting Jobless Claims Becomes a Boom Industry

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/us/04talx.html?partner=EXCITE&ei=5043

By JASON DePARLE
Published: April 3, 2010

WASHINGTON — With a client list that reads like a roster of Fortune 500 firms, a little-known company with an odd name, the Talx Corporation, has come to dominate a thriving industry: helping employers process — and fight — unemployment claims.

Talx, which emerged from obscurity over the last eight years, says it handles more than 30 percent of the nation’s requests for jobless benefits. Pledging to save employers money in part by contesting claims, Talx helps them decide which applications to resist and how to mount effective appeals.

The work has made Talx a boom business in a bust economy, but critics say the company has undermined a crucial safety net. Officials in a number of states have called Talx a chronic source of error and delay. Advocates for the unemployed say the company seeks to keep jobless workers from collecting benefits.


Matthew Cavanaugh for The New York Times

By the time Gerald Grenier successfully completed the process for unemployment benefits, he had lost his apartment and moved in with his sister.


“Talx often files appeals regardless of merits,” said Jonathan P. Baird, a lawyer at New Hampshire Legal Assistance. “It’s sort of a war of attrition. If you appeal a certain percentage of cases, there are going to be those workers who give up.”

When fewer former workers get aid, a company pays lower unemployment taxes.

Wisconsin and Iowa passed laws to curtail procedural abuses that officials said were common in cases handled by Talx. Connecticut fined Talx (pronounced talks) and demanded an end to baseless appeals. New York, without naming Talx, instructed the Labor Department staff to side with workers in cases that simply pit their word against those of agents for employers.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. just like debt collectors. what a wonderful bunch they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. My unemployment claim has been a complete fiasco.
Nothing done by PA Unemployment has been correct. Nothing. It's been a total exercise in frustration. I wonder if this company has anything to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. I do hope that plenty of Talx Corp employees are laid off.
And their UE claims are contested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. My employer fought. I ruined them in court. Had to ask my parents whether I should
ruin their business. They said, let it slide. Son of a bitch is hurting about now, with throat cancer. The last time I visited there, it was to inquire how his cancer was going. DIE FUCKER<>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC