Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald told Grand Jury that Rove Lied 8/9 times to investigators.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:53 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald told Grand Jury that Rove Lied 8/9 times to investigators.
Edited on Thu Apr-20-06 09:57 PM by rodeodance

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/042006Z.shtml

Grand Jury Hears Evidence Against Rove
By Jason Leopold
t r u t h o u t | Report

Thursday 20 April 2006

> ...... Fitzgerald told the grand jury that Rove lied to investigators and the prosecutor eight out of the nine times he was questioned about the leak and also tried to cover-up his role in disseminating Plame Wilson's CIA status to at least two reporters.
>
........
>
> Rove's story began to unravel when Fitzgerald discovered the existence of an email Rove sent to then-Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley after he spoke with Cooper on July 11, 2003.
>
> Rove did not disclose the existence of the email during his first two appearances before the grand jury. Rove testified that he found out about Plame Wilson after her identity was disclosed in several news stories.
>
> "I didn't take the bait," Rove wrote in the email to Hadley immediately following his conversation with Cooper. "Matt Cooper called to give me a heads-up that he's got a welfare reform story coming. When he finished his brief heads-up he immediately launched into Niger. Isn't this damaging? Hasn't the president been hurt? I didn't take the bait, but I said if I were him I wouldn't get Time far out in front on this."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ummm spelling?
It's FITZgerald...just sayin'.... :popcorn:


Sure hope Rove gets indicted and has to testofy under oath!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. gawd, I wish this investigation would move faster!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. You have to be patient. Here, have a drink on me!


:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Oh, man, I'm soooo thirsty for some justice!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. The Ryan prosecution began slowly.
Convicted on all counts.

Let Fitz be Fitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
71. I do too, but Fitz is up against one of the slickest & sickest bunch
of mafioso types we can imagine. Ducks must be in rows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I have corrected Rodeo before about that.
S/he won't budge from it. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. You all know what the "fitz" prefix means, don't you?
It means "a royal bastard." Go Fitz!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #33
42. Fitzgerald = Mac Gerailt
The Sons of Gerailt are two large families that are closely associated with the Angelo-Norman invasions of the island. The two primary "divisions" are the Desmonds (the famous "Knights of Kerry" and "Knights of Glin"); and those of Kildare, who are best known for being entirely focused on the cause of truth and justice in the Rebellion of Silken Thomas .... and, of course, the execution of Henry VIII of Thomas, and his family, in 1537. In the US, it is commonly associated with the southern Clanna, because of the Kennedys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #33
61. I was going to say Fitz means "the son of"
But H2O Man beat me to it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey! He told the truth once!
With this White House, that's a high standard.

Of course, I bet it was when they asked his name.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. i think that is an F-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:59 PM
Original message
AND Hadley is still up for grabs!

..... Hadley, sources said, is also a subject of the investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chomp Donating Member (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
78. Haha! Well spotted.
The real story is: "Karl Rove didn't lie when asked a question!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. The real reason why Rove resigned his duties. Its looking good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. I'm so slow.
If Fitz counted the lies to the jury, he's asking them to indict. Yowza.

When do they vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. How many years does each indictment carry?
Just wondering...I'm hoping a lot....the Pillsbury Doughboy Rove deserves to sit in prison for a very very long time....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Never enough.
Fitz should have asked him a lot more questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Memory Container Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #30
45. Obstruction of Justice.... Perjury.... don't know...
But I'd wager that Rove is ultimately not so loyal that he wouldn't roll.
His Lawyers, whose duty it is to protect him, will try to get him to.

Should be lovely to see who he rolls on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. He will NEVER give up the love of his life, Dubya. NEVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #47
52. I don't know about that
pudgy boy in federal prison for a LOOOOOOOOONG time? Or rolling on the boss? I pick number one!



:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. One of the things
Edited on Fri Apr-21-06 08:52 AM by H2O Man
I thought was extremely telling about George Bush's personality make-up was when he was out on the White House lawn with Scott M. The guy had made clear, after Andy Card "left," that he wanted to stay on as press secretary until the fall. Remember, he is one of the president's friends. And he got forced out. Watch when he starts getting choked up on the lawn, wimpering about, "I've given it my all, sir, and I've given you my all." Look at Bush's face. He has a smirk that conveys contempt for Scott -- his friend -- and a pleasure in Scott's suffering.

Rove will be more loyal to Bush, who he has an almost romantic love for, than Bush will be to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. one of the creepiest things about bush
is his pleasure in human suffering. It is chilling. :scared:

Do you believe rove will go down for bush? Or is this where cheney gets implicated by rove? When do you think rove will be indicted?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #58
67. I do not think
that Bush's role was any where near as significant as Cheney's. So I think Rove will, by nature, point to Libby and Cheney as being responsible for the scandal, as Wilson noted on page 444 of his book. (However, there could be information regarding Bush that I am not aware of. Were he tied closer to the exposing of Plame, or the cover-up, it would come as a welcome surprise.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #47
86. None of those children are above tattling to save their tails.
They'll all sing. Period. After all, he was just fired by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #45
66. OOJ - 10 yrs; Perjury - 5 yrs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. could be could be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Rove resigned his duties? - he fails in November he's toast!!
GOP all don't feel the great white hope will bring back Bush's popularity, the last time Bush showed up to give support to 2 politicians? they both lost!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
76. Rove didn't resign his duties.
They fired scotty as a token and Rove moved over to organize the theft of the 06 congressional campaign. They can't afford to lose either house in 06 as if they do they will all go to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #76
77. Sure he did. He resigned as chief of policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #77
83. Which amounted to nothing.
Rove is directing the 06 campaign. He was always going to direct the 06 campaign. They needed to put on a show to divert from the RummyRevolt, and they did: they tossed Scotty under the bus and made a big deal out of Rove focusing on keeping them out of jail long enough to get the next war on.

It is one of their trademark moves: divert and distract.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #83
85. Which amounts to Bush saying I already fired him when Rove is indicted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #76
81. Yep
He's freed up to steal the vote while he waits to be indicted. If they lose either house, they're all toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wonder how Fitz got the email? I thought I read that Hadley
didn't turn it over upon supoena either. Hmmmm....

Man, can't believe he told the truth once ! Good boy !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. recall the emails that were suddently 'discovered' (after the WH had
said they were lost)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:01 PM
Original message
yes, but this article is making it sound like Fitz had a copy before
the "discovery" and was waiting and waiting for Rove to tell the truth about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. I did not read it like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. dupe
Edited on Thu Apr-20-06 10:02 PM by Laura PackYourBags
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
40. How Fitzgerald got the e-mail:
Luskin and Rove knew if Cooper and Time refused to cooperate with Fitzgerald, Karl's lie was safe. But Cooper was not as solid as Judy Miller. He had already backed down to Fitzgerald on Libby: when the court ordered him to testify, based on Scooter's signing off, Cooper did (Judith refused until she got the personal okay). So Luskin was wondering about Cooper, and about Time. So he had a series of meetings with Time's Vivica Novak, who admittedly told him that the "talk" at Time was that Rove was Cooper's source.

In her last article in Time, before "agreeing" to what we might politely call getting fired, Ms. Novak said Luskin had a physical reaction to this news. In fact, he would immediately tell Karl the news. They then retrieved the e-mail, and turned it over to Fitzgerald when Time had agreed to turn their documents over to the prosecution. Cooper got a call from Rove, literally within 24 hours of facing incarceration. You may recall him appearing very close to an emotional collapse outside the court, on the morning Judith went to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #40
55. When I read this article, and saw that Fitz said that Rove lied
8 out of 9 times about the leak, I guess I falsely assumed that refered to the email and meant Fitz knew (had the memo in his position) previous to Rove's turing it over belatedly. So I guess I took that wrong. I wonder exactly what he lied about. So, he said 8 times that he never leaked to a reporter and then the 9th time he said he did because he finally turned over the email in the sequence you said?

For fun, let's just say that KKKarl REALLY didn't remember. And then he remembered when they found the email, belatedly. Then, why would the "8 times" have any significance at all? Why would Fitz point that out? If you truly didn't remember until you found the email then denying the leak 8 times or 108 times - it wouldn't mean anything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. I think
that the number of lies has to do with the separate and distinct lies that Fitzgerald wants the grand jury to consider for "counts" in the possible indictment. My guess -- and this is only speculation -- is that the grand jury will return indictments on 4 to 5 of the charges.

It is interesting to consider that Mr. Fitzgerald might have had the e-mail before Rove "found" it. Again, this is mere speculation .... but both Mr. Rove and Mr. Hadley had the e-mail. My understanding is that Mr. Fitzgerald has acquired a very substantial amount of evidence, far more than the indictment against Libby hints at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #57
63. thanks for your explanation ! Yes, I don't know if anyone has
concluded whether or not Fitz has actually confiscated the server or has access to the audit file. Or -- does he only have access to what he was given under supoena.

But, I do wonder if Rove et al THOUGHT Fitz had that email? Otherwise, why would they "uncover" it? If I wanted to "play" like I didn't remember talking to Cooper, then I surely would never uncover an email saying that I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #63
68. What you are focusing on
is absolutely one of the key issues. Rove is, by nature, the type who tries to control everything. Where Libby & Cheney manipulate from the shadows, and play possum when attention focuses on them, Karl is a different breed. He also has the inner compulsion to manipulate. I'm sure that Mr. Fitzgerald has exploited that behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. Great insight ! You are right ! I suspect what happened was that
once Rove knew for certain that Fitz knew he had talked to Cooper, he had two choices. One, to ignore the news and just cross that bridge later (ala Cheney/Libby, as you mention above). Or two, act upon it, call Fitz's hand, which he couldn't resist doing. He created a scenario -- "Delving into old records, finding the email, and at that point had an "Aha" moment."

I am sure he was probably hoping to find a more benign email than he found (assuming it is a real email produced after the Cooper call). But, Rove was so strongly compelled to offer something to Fitz that he:
(1) turned over an email that was not very exculpatory,
(2) turned over an email that contradicts Coooper's testimony on subject, and
(3) by these actions, admitted that he (and Hadley for that matter) did not comply with the subpoena parameters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #68
84. Like all good poker player who watch the eyes, hands and pattern
Edited on Fri Apr-21-06 07:23 PM by 0007
of the personality. Rove thought he was checking a cinch and got nailed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #40
69. What about the backup WH e-mail server?
Didn't Fitz have access to that from virtually the beginning of Bush's order to release White House records? Seems that comparing the two sets of e-mails would be a good place to start an investigation. Certainly a guide to lines of questioning witnesses before the Grand Jury.

Seems to me that Libby, Rove, and the rest have been lying to prevent the POLITICAL consequences of their bosses intimate knowledge and involvement in the conspiracy. In so doing, they sacrificed themselves so Bush-Cheney could be reelected in November 2004. That's the only explanation that makes sense to me for why these guys have been lying to Fitz. The second-tier WH guys -- Libby, Rove, Hadley -- all knew that Fitz was going to see through the lies, but they threw themselves in front of the tank tracks as a delaying action.

That tactic appears to have succeeded -- I wonder what happens politically when the bulk of the American people come to understand that? Seems that the 2004 Presidential election was won by a different kind of fraud, one which is perhaps easier for people to understand and accept, and maybe do something about. Will we see a push to recover BushCo's unjust gains, and a demand for restitution? See my dairy yesterday: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/4/20/11309/5077
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. following the Bush example, i see
I can't have lost, I didn't lose! I fixed it so I know there is no possible way I lost. I refuse to abide by the result, I win whatever whichever rules have to be shoved aside. I don't care-I win, I win, I win. It all belongs to me anyway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. If this is true, why didn't he charge him with Libby?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. see this: Fitz said soon to present jury with criminal charges against Rov
e.


.... Just as the news broke Wednesday about Scott McClellan resigning as White House press secretary and Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove shedding some of his policy duties, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald met with the grand jury hearing evidence in the CIA leak case and introduced additional evidence against Rove, attorneys and other US officials close to the investigation said.

The grand jury session in federal court in Washington, DC, sources close to the case said, was the first time this year that Fitzgerald told the jurors that he would soon present them with a list of criminal charges he intends to file against Rove in hopes of having the grand jury return a multi-count indictment against Rove.

In an interview Wednesday, Rove's attorney, Robert Luskin, confirmed that Rove remains a "subject" of Fitzgerald's two-year-old probe.

"Mr. Rove is still a subject of the investigation," Luskin said. In a previous interview, Luskin asserted that Rove would not be indicted by Fitzgerald, but he was unwilling to make that prediction again Wednesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. "in hopes of having the GJ return a multi-count indictment against ROVE"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. Somehow I posted this here, when it was a response to a different thread
(Berlusconi refuses to give up power)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, Mr. Rove needs to be indicted, however it'll have to wait until
after November elections, don't be surprised, Bush and Cheney pulled that one when 9-11 commission had their findings ready for the public -- Bush said you must wait until after the 2004 elections before you release your findings...anf they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I know, I was --am so angry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. I just hope Leopold knows what he is talking about (that his sources are
good)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Things are good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. David Corn (Nation) Rove on the Stand?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20060418/cm_thenation/378126;_ylt=A86.I0qlIkVEVkABGBH9wxIF;_ylu=X3oDMTBjMHVqMTQ4BHNlYwN5bnN1YmNhdA--

Rove on the Stand?

David Corn Tue Apr 18, 1:33 PM ET

The Nation -- There is a clash of titans underway at the filing room of the federal courthouse in Washington. Now that special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald and Scooter Libby's defense team are in the thick of pretrial motions, every week or so one side or the other files a motion, a counter-motion or a counter-counter-motion, and these documents are providing sporadic glimpses into what happened in the weeks that led up to the Plame/CIA leak in 2003. For instance, it was a Fitzgerald filing that revealed that Libby had testified that
Dick Cheney had authorized him to leak selective portions of the National Intelligence Estimate on WMDs in Iraq to New York Times reporter Judith Miller and that this had happened after George W. Bush approved releasing (or leaking) slices of the NIE.

The most recent Libby filing did not contain such a blockbuster disclosure. But here are a few interesting portions:

When the issue of Valerie Wilson's employment is viewed in its proper context, and the full story is revealed, it will be clear that Ms. Wilson's role was a peripheral issue. If the press stories surrounding the governments NIE disclosure illustrate anything, it is that this case is factually complex and that the government's notion that it involves only Mr. Libby and the OVP is a fairy tale.

Hmmm, does this mean that there was a wide-ranging White House effort to undercut Joe Wilson's credibility that involved others than Libby and went beyond trying to depict Wilson trip to Niger as a boondoggle orchestrated by his wife, a CIA officer? Libby's lawyers keep hinting that they will suck the rest of the White House into the case to defend their man. But this is puzzling, for if Libby goes too far down that road, won't he hurt his standing as a deserving recipient of a presidential pardon? Many White House fans are raising millions of dollars for the Libby defense fund and a conservative think tank has put him on the payroll. So how many grenades can Libby throw at Bush, Cheney and Karl Rove?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Man oh man
I'm as anxious as an alligator at hatching season.

If he didn't have to put extensive time into the Ryan case, he would have done this much sooner. But he didn't want to rush it. He just got the grand jury all set up, went back to Chicago and nailed Ryan to the wall. ....Now it's Rove's turn.

:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #23
41. The long plane trip to Africa was where they cooked up their revenge
You just KNOW these freaks were going to try and "get Joe WEilson" for daring to tell the truth.. They also were probably worried that the fake documents would be tracked back to them..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #41
50. David was murdered for what he knew, Blair freaked and called Bu$h
Edited on Fri Apr-21-06 08:58 AM by Jose Diablo
Bu$h and all, burned down Plame, and her cover Brewster & Jenning's to smother the discovery of the plan to plant WMD in Iraq to justify the invasion of Iraq.

Thus, our protective shield in the intelligence community used to prevent nuclear proliferation to third world countries and terrorists was destroyed in the name of politics.

All this in time of war, to profit politically, they waged war against, us. It is treason in the Office of the President. A hangman's noose is too light of a sentence for these people that have done this deed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
26. this is so interesting!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
28. To what music do frogs march?
Edited on Thu Apr-20-06 10:42 PM by Jack Rabbit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change has come Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. That picture makes me very happy.
and it makes a wonderful desktop background!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. Try this one



Image from Rock City Photos

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change has come Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. With his high water pants and presidential cowboy boots.
Gives me an idea for a thread...Mind if I use these pictures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #38
59. Go ahead. It;s not my picture to give away
Credit is given in the post above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #37
44. LOL!
next, PhotoShop him in a flight suit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #37
74. wow !! another gem..outstanding jack rabbit ^5 to you nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #28
73. gotta love that photo...so cool...take a bow and wish it...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
29. Rove is finding out that he's not as smart as they told him he was.
Porky believed his own hype. So sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. Eggzactly. But it's not sad though. It's exhilirating!
I hope he goes DOWN like the scum he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
34. He'll give up Hadley...
...and Hadley will give up Deadeye Dick.

The whole operation ran out of the OVP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
39. Of particular interest
is Luskin saying that Rove hasn't "discussed any plea deal with Fitzgerald." He then states that Karl's "cooperation is not contingent on any plea deal with the prosecutor. He has always cooperated voluntarily and unconditionally."

In the past few months, it has been known (by Jason Leopold's top-notch reporting) that Rove was "cooperating" with Fitzgerald. The extent was not known, though many of us suspected it was largely an effort by Karl to point the finger of blame at the Office of the Vice President.

Yet the questioned remained -- for me, at least -- would Fitzgerald and Luskin strike a deal? We know that Libby tried to get one, but refused the prosecutor's offer, because it included substantial time in prison.

Luskin saying that Rove didn't talk to Fitzgerald is a joke. Of course he didn't. He is the client. Luskin talks to Fitzgerald, then tells Rove what the offer is.

If Rove agreed to the prison time, there would be no indictment .... just the plea deal. But there isn't a deal. Karl will be indicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #39
46. I hope it comes before Karl does any more "independent polling"
of our elections. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #46
51. Quite soon
Karl will be advocating for convicted felons to have their voting rights reinstated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #51
62. H2O Man,
You really know how to tell it like it is! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #62
79. I can't wait
I have the perfect photo waiting for the thread announcing KKKKKKKK's indictments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #39
49. Ahhh... Things are Good (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #49
53. Indeed,
they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
43. though this makes me jump for joy
where is Leopold geting this info? Actually, I don't care just hope it's reliable. Multiple counts of perjury AND obstruction of justice? Is this a dream?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
48. Hmmmm demoted and indicted? Juicy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
54. Question for anyone in the know;
Edited on Fri Apr-21-06 09:22 AM by Alamom
I was away for a while due to illness right after the indictments in Oct, so if this has been discussed, I missed it.

I just read P. Fitzgerald's term as prosecuter was supposed to be up in October 05.

In the summer of 2005, there were rumors that he would not be reappointed to a second four-year term.
(Wikipedia)

I can't find anything about him being reappointed

I find this, but no mention it extends his term.

On December 30, 2003, Fitzgerald was appointed Special Counsel (under Department of Justice regulation 28 CFR Part 600) in the Plame affair investigation.


This is a curiosity question, but what happened and who reappointed him?



Anyone?




TIA





edit:spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #54
72. I believe that pertained to his work as a Federal prosecutor
in Illinois, not to his work in the CIA leak case. My understanding is that he's on this job for the duration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
60. I have this image...
Of Fitz roasting Rove like a suckling pig over a pit...turning....S L O W L Y ... and letting Rove sizzle...

Ah....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
64. Thank you Jason Leopold.
His reporting on this is incredible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
65. Do you want to know why Rove will not be indicted?
Because Rove will tell Bush to launch all nukes if he is indicted. Rove will tell Fitz that he's the only one that can control Georgie-boy, and if he doesn't drop the investigation...well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #65
75. abc says GJ is meeting today--(friday)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
80. This contradicts what Schuster told Olberman
(I think it was KO- last night anyway) Schuster said that there was no indication that Fitz has been with the GJ this week. Leopold writes that Fitz was with them on Wed-

"Just as the news broke Wednesday about Scott McClellan resigning as White House press secretary and Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove shedding some of his policy duties, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald met with the grand jury hearing evidence in the CIA leak case and introduced additional evidence against Rove, attorneys and other US officials close to the investigation said."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
82. I think the e-mail was from Hadley's computer records
I think he said that he knew nothing, but Fitz already had the e-mail, let him know it, and went after Rove. I think that's when Hadley was worried about being indicted (for OOJ or perjury?) himself. Then, suddenly, Luskin played the Novak card and off we went that-a-way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC