Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. building massive embassy in Baghdad

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 12:32 AM
Original message
U.S. building massive embassy in Baghdad

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1107AP_Iraq_New_Embassy.html

U.S. building massive embassy in Baghdad

BAGHDAD, Iraq -- The fortress-like compound rising beside the Tigris River here will be the largest of its kind in the world, the size of Vatican City, with the population of a small town, its own defense force, self-contained power and water, and a precarious perch at the heart of Iraq's turbulent future.

The new U.S. Embassy also seems as cloaked in secrecy as the ministate in Rome.

"We can't talk about it. Security reasons," Roberta Rossi, a spokeswoman at the current embassy, said when asked for information about the project.

A British tabloid even told readers the location was being kept secret - news that would surprise Baghdadis who for months have watched the forest of construction cranes at work across the winding Tigris, at the very center of their city and within easy mortar range of anti-U.S. forces in the capital, though fewer explode there these days.

...

"The presence of a massive U.S. embassy - by far the largest in the world - co-located in the Green Zone with the Iraqi government is seen by Iraqis as an indication of who actually exercises power in their country," the International Crisis Group, a European-based research group, said in one of its periodic reports on Iraq.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Embassy and the "enduring" bases
are unpleasant reminders that we're in Iraq for good. There's no exit strategy because-- we're not exiting.

No wonder BushCo won't talk about the embassy and the massive military bases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. terrible.....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. k & r eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. We will be there to control their oil until it's gone
That's what the war was all about. Just think, the Exxon retiring exec was paid $6,000 an hour.

That redistribution of our taxes to the globalists is what W is all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. The most important feature of this new embassy
Will be the roof. It will have to be strong enough to support the last helicopter as it lifts off with the last Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Maybe they will take their country back from the empire
Edited on Sat Apr-15-06 12:48 AM by Erika
Something the American Indians weren't able to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. you got that right
Edited on Sat Apr-15-06 12:50 AM by arewenotdemo
stupid...fucking...idiots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Great.. .Baghdad gets its own Death Star.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. ...self-contained power and water...
I think it's interesting that they feel they need this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. The $ we've spent shipping bottled water in for our troops
is far above the cost of building the infrastructure for
producing their own drinking water. This has been known for at least two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. I don't think the Iraqi people voted for this.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Do you realize what this means?
This will obviously be the base of operations for the Neocon government to control the middle
east and all the oil it holds.

If they are setting up such a permanent base that means that they are
confident that America will continue to need and use this base after this administration leaves.

This of course is extremely unlikely because a Democratic administration will clearly not continue
the same government policies. So why are they building this?

The alternative is that this administration doesn't expect to leave. They plan to remain
in power indefinitely with no one able to drive them out.

Real Scary.

What the hell's going on behind that dark curtain?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC