Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can anyone see Hillary taking #2 on the ticket?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:58 AM
Original message
Poll question: Can anyone see Hillary taking #2 on the ticket?
Just curious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, that's her role
Perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely ...
It is the best spot for her in this upcoming election ... It puts her name and bucks into the game, and it helps to mitigate the 10 year smear campaign ... It eases the whole woman in charge thing ... THEN, it sets her up to make the presidential run on the backend ...

My ticket all along has been Clark/Hillary ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. ive never understood what clark had to offer.
hes a decent enough guy but I dont see anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I completely agree
I am not opposed to him I just don't get the basis for the enthusiasm. Is it is military credentials that are viewed as unassailable and a sellingpoint for moderate voters? or is it what he has said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I got tuned into him here ...
I started looking into him, and I like what I see a lot ...

The military creds are big ... It TOTALLY mitigates the R spin about Ds are soft on defense/security ... No comparison to Kerry, who was not a career guy, who came back and did the anti-war stuff, and who "took the high road" when the freepers swiftboated him ... NOT knocking him, I think he is patriot and all ... But, Wes has the career thing, moved up to generalship on a BIG level ... Commanded combined forces from multiple countries, ran a successful campaign, and is a decorated and injured field vet ...

Out of the gates, it just is HUGE in taking one of the big legs of negative campaigning against Ds away from the freepers ... He is just the right age ... Good looking, from Arkansas (or lived there), so he ain't a "northerner" ...

In following him, I found him to be VERY intelligent, tops in his class at a military institute, BUT also cleary compassionate ... You can just see it in his eyes ... Soft spoken, and nearly all his positions are solidly progressive ...

He carries himself so well ... For a guy to consistently do bits on Fox, and not even break a sweat while beating them at their own game ... Not too many libs/progressives can take on conservatives without blowing a gasket, and that includes me ...

National security and our status in the world are going to be H U G E in 2008 ... Iraq will be a complete or never ending disaster, and who knows what other can of worms this crew will open up ... Wes has the experience, and status to be a guy who can start to clean the mess up ...

A Hill VP matches well ... At least on the surface, she will look the role of domestic manager to his role as commander in chief ... She would bring her "resources" as well as a lot of experience in winning two presidential campaigns, and being in the white house during a darn good time for our country ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Hillary
I've always thought that a Gore/Clinton ticket would be best in terms of talent if not elect ability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Gore/clinton Clark/clinton
IMHO are both winners
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. plus
name recognition alone with the fact that they are together again side by side.

i know that doesnt mean alot, but to un-informed people you never know what might push you over the edge to win it.

i really think gore should be the nominee... kind of a correcting of the huge mistake and giving the rightful winner his office.
i think it not only unify the party, a gore/clinton ticket, but grab moderates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's possible...
...but it would only solidify a loss for us in 2008. Rationally or not, too many people hate Hillary Clinton for her to be much more than a coffin nail in our upcoming attempt to save America from fascism and corporatism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. wow a tie vote thus far
seems to me that suggest either folks think her ego might be too big or that she would not help the ticke in swing states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. She wants the top of the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Gore/Clinton 08!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I think she would be a great VP
A woman running 2nd on the ticket would not be the precedent-buster that being the first woman president would be... but it would be an excellent move in that direction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I personally do not see any electoral upside.
Running mates need to deliver there home staye..NY is solidly DEM anyway The only way she brings across swing states is if she creates an explosiv gender gap that neutralis the religious right. I just think that is a crap shoot at best.

My guess is that elctorally unless he is the presidential nominee, Warner is the best VP option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. Nope. She's been there, done that.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. #1 AND #2! Sorry for the grade school "wit", but I'm no fan of DLClinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC