The official inquiry into the 7 July London bombings will say the attack was planned on a shoestring budget from information on the internet, that there was no 'fifth-bomber' and no direct support from al-Qaeda, although two of the bombers had visited Pakistan.
The first forensic account of the atrocity that claimed the lives of 52 people, which will be published in the next few weeks, will say that attacks were the product of a 'simple and inexpensive' plot hatched by four British suicide bombers bent on martyrdom.
Far from being the work of an international terror network, as originally suspected, the attack was carried out by four men who had scoured terror sites on the internet. Their knapsack bombs cost only a few hundred pounds, according to the first completed draft of the government's definitive report into the blasts.http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1750139,00.htmlWell, does this explain why we still don't know what kind of explosives were used?
How the bombs were triggered?
Why there is neither a single CCTV image showing the alleged bombers in the train or at the train station nor do we have any witness who saw the alleged bombers that day?
Why there were at least three masterminds with direct connection to al Qaeda that had close relation to the alleged bombers?
One even was phoned by one alleged bomber the morning of 7/7
And from the same article:
"A videotape of Mohammed Siddique Khan released after the attacks also featured footage of Osama bin Laden's deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri. The Home Office believes the tape was edited after the suicide attacks and dismisses it as evidence of al-Qaeda's involvement in the attack."(/i]
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1750139,00.html
A faked video.
(thx to John Doe II) 
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
