Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A sliver of sanity: Cesar Chavez was against illegal immigration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 08:19 AM
Original message
A sliver of sanity: Cesar Chavez was against illegal immigration
Cesar Chavez, the prominent Mexican-American labor leader and activist who fought for migrant worker civil rights, was opposed to illegal immigration. He believed, like progressives generally used to, that the hiring of illegal workers drove down the wages for the legal workers. He founded the United Farm Workers union and he would turn in illegals and report their employers during his presidency. He even organized marches opposing illegal immigration and the hiring of illegal workers, right along the border of Arizona and Mexico.

I had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Chavez in 1987. He was a great man. I wish he was still around to be a voice for labor and for sanity on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Second that. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Third that, now let us return to the real issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes and no, He opposed illegal immigration BUT...
Edited on Tue Apr-11-06 08:34 AM by ugarte
...advocated on behalf of those already here. No question he would not have supported criminalizing those already here. In fact he would have supported some form of amnesty. What he really opposed were not illegals per se, but strikebreakers, illegal or otherwise. The bosses were bussing in illegals as strikebreakers, so let's put things in context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Just wondering
No question he would not have supported criminalizing those already here. In fact he would have supported some form of amnesty.

Do you believe that we can be confident about whether or not a particular person from history would have supported a given policy?

Do you believe that if a particular person from history actually supported a given policy then that is a good reason for us to support the policy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. You don't really believe Chavez's farmworkers were all legals, do you?
Historically, no, I don't like putting words in people's mouths. But saying he would support deporting 12 million people, splitting up families, etc...that was not Chavez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. In context
I feel pretty confident in saying that Chavez would be pretty disgusted at the state of labor in America today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I absolutely agree,,,nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. The UFW supports amnesty and citizenship for immigrants.
"A harsh, anti-immigrant enforcement-only bill will not fix our broken immigration system. We need the Senate to come up with a real bipartisan solution that offers the chance for hardworking undocumented immigrants performing work crucial for the U.S. Economy to earn the right to stay in this country permanently with a path to citizenship."

Above is a copy of the letter the UFW suggests sending to the senate.

http://www.ufwaction.org/campaign/hr4437eng
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. "work crucial for the U.S. Economy"
...the chance for hardworking undocumented immigrants performing work crucial for the U.S. Economy to earn the right to stay in this country permanently...

If the work is crucial for the U.S. Economy, then can we assume that workers who spend their entire working lives doing that kind of work are able to retire without facing financial hardship?

After they have earned the right to stay, will they perform a kind of work that is classified as "crucial for the U.S. Economy"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
9.  kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. He also used a psychotherapy nut cult to purge his outfit
of ALL of the people who started out with him, turned the "union" into a family cash cow, and his "union" has not had a single labor contract in decades. Somebody posted yesterday hearing a wingnut say on t.v. that CHAVEZ would probably be a Repuke today, which given the preceding sentence just might be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. Definitely a feather in his cap.
I have utmost respect for any South American leader who figures out that the U.S. isn't the dumping ground for the social & economic misery they cause due to inept leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. you may be thinking of Hugo Chavez
and of course, you may wish to look closer to home for examples of inept leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Believe me, I was.
Edited on Tue Apr-11-06 02:13 PM by The Backlash Cometh
And, yes, I was thinking of Hugo Chavez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks for the reminder, I remember when he worked so hard for
the migrant farm workers, if only we could be so lucky to have some one like him today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. People keep bringing this up but please put out the whole
story out if you must post this. Cesar actually tried to bring the undocumented workers into the UFW, his union, but when he did the farmers in the Imperial Valley which is along the border with Mexico would bring in workers from Mexico. Those worker were also intimidated and frightened by the farmers into not joining the union when approached. So in exasperation Chavez had to fight this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC