WHY is no one talking about Brewster Jennings?

[serryjw]

* should be fried for what they did to Valerie/Joe BUT the moment he declassified her info, exposed her 'employer' they put 20 years of National Security in jeopardy. I have heard NO ONE mention this on TV. WHY are the dems not talking about this?

[NYC]

1. They should be.

It is a very serious issue. A breach of national security by the pResident who is keeping us safe.

I think it is an act of treason.

[chicofaraby]

2. "WHY are the dems not talking about this?"

Fear?

The same reason the majority of Dems voted for the Iraq war and the Hatriot Act.

[Suich]

3. Help me out here...who is he? Thanks! eom

[serryjw]

5. here is your education

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brewster_Jennings_&_Associates

[Suich]

11. Thanks! Consider me educated! n/t

[unblock]

4. right. the focus on plame/wilson makes it seem like only they were hurt

when in fact shrub gutted an entire intelligence network that was tracking nuclear wmds.

if indeed he undermined our national security and increased our risk of a nuclear terrorist attack for the sole purpose of doing something nasty to one person he didn't like, that would be an astoundingly colossal display of criminal incompetence.

[serryjw]

7. I don't get it........

Your accessment is correct. It is a total win for the dems. There is NO WAY he could justify doing this when it took 20 years to build the cover. WHOM is our MOST vocal Comgressperson/Senator on this issue? Time for a letter.
IF * was trying to 'educate' Americans on WHY it was important to go into Iraq WHY did he NOT hold a press conference when he declassified the info instead of leaking it? This is such kaka poo poo!

[alittlelark]

6. It's still the 'LEFT wing media'

Why would they be interested in getting to the BOTTOM of this issue?:sarcasm:

[serryjw]

8. So WHY did we NOT

have a press conference? Don't we have ANY left media ? Keith?

[alittlelark]

17. Amy Goodman....AAR.... little else I know of.

Wes Clark is ALL OVER.... he is loved by R's and D's..... but he is a free thinker. The evil left wing media never reports on his appearances. Hmmmm........

[flyarm]

9. please k& r the thread i have inside this post..and move it up! & read

it on greatest board..then media might have to report it

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x894299

and do read through the links!!

thanks fly

[Dr.Phool]

12. I contacted Robyn Blumner from the SPTimes about it today.

Told her it would make a great column for her. She could probably write a book about it.

Her reply:
Thanks for the idea, Rick. You make a great point. I haven't been writing on the "leaks" issue because it doesn't really involve civil liberties. But I've certainly been following it closely. --Robyn

Hopefully, she'll pick it up. She has the talent and readership, but it doesn't sound promising. Tomorrow I'll work on Josh Marshall, Eric Alterman, and a few others.

[flyarm]

13. thanks dr phool!! can always count on you!!..randi rhodes must have

seen the thread today cause she talked about it in some detail!!

please go over and kick and r it ..we need it to move up!!

thanks dear..wink wink!!

:hi: :hug: :loveya: :pals:

fly

[serryjw]

14. WOW! brilliant minds

think alike..Thanks for your post.

[Judi Lynn]

10. Kick!

:kick: :kick: :kick:

[Dr.Phool]

15. Give the issue lots of kicks!

We're talkin TREASON here folks! Don't let them spin it into, "The president can declassify information as he sees fit"!

He exposed and destroyed a 20 year, deep-cover intelligence operation, and everyone involved in it, to extract revenge on a political opponent!

[fooj]

22. How is treason suddenly NOT a crime?

Peace.

[peacetalksforall]

16. I heard Joe Wilson tonight. I so wanted him to say the two words. nt

[flyarm]

18. please everyone go read this enclosed link...it has loads of info!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x894299

on greatest page!

and recommend while you are there..lets get this to the top!

thanks fly

[BattyDem]

19. Not TV ... but Randi Rhodes mentions it a lot

I wish we could get Keith Olbermann to talk about it, too.

[orleans]

20. bawk bawk bawk

but i'm listening to randi rhodes (downloaded from whiterosesociety.org) and she is currently talking about it.

[SeveneightyWhoa]

21. There's too much "wild speculation" in the story.

As Bush/Rove would say, of course.

Also, there's too much "truth" for the media to uncover in regards to this issue. Meaning, of course, that they'd have it easier (and cheaper, and politically safer) to simply stay within the comfortable realm of "truthiness".