Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SO Judas wasn't a leaker, either...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:52 AM
Original message
SO Judas wasn't a leaker, either...
Psyops at its best. The Godly one TOLD me to do it, so it's really a service to the Lord.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Judas betrayed Christ; Bush betrayed America
But it's all good, man...(republicon "ethics")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep... Judas, with his kiss of death
Ratted Jesus out.

I'm more interested in the current Repub song fest myself:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Guy Donating Member (875 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Hundreds of thousands died because of Bush's betrayal
I doubt that many died because of Judas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. A cardinal at the Vatican called the Judas revelation "religious fantasy"
That's a decent description of Bush**'s motivations too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I dare you to ask them about Galileo. Go ahead. Dare ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Bah, there's nothing I'd ask the Vatican that I haven't already asked
...the Jehovah's Witnesses. And I expect the answers would be equally inane!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. B* has no religion other than self interest. It is a "fantasy" but a
political one. He is not and never will be a Christian. God must hate B*. The Judas story is interesting, but it implies that Christ wanted to "take the hemlock" like Socrates. No way can I imagine that Christ would ever contemplate suicide. He had already "overcome the world" and he was much too courageous to do so. IMO, the tragic Christ image is a gross misinterpretation of Christ's message, which was Joy and Peace and Love; Not tragedy or fear or punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I'd be interested to know if this turns out to be a rejected text
You know, writers will often have several versions of how a particular story ends. And the Bible was cobbled together over several centuries from hundreds of texts, many of which were rejected as 'not on message' or simply left out for practical reasons.

As far as Bush** goes, anyone who believes he's really a Christian damages their own credibility. Jesus would never abide using the gospel as a political tool to rally support for bombing and torturing people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I would vote for rejection, considering the fate of the Naj Hammadi texts
and other 'apocrypha' but time will tell. We share the same opinion on B*'s so-called Christianity...Never in my wildest imagination would I think it possible that one administration could simultaneously damage two such seemingly opposite historical characters; Christ and Machiavelli. The BFEE has given both a bad name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Yep, it's one of the rejected texts; up on BBC site
Not so secret gospels
Stephen Tomkins

snip...

The first thing to say is that we do not know much about the precise contents yet. National Geographic has put the whole text online, but with only half a dozen short pages in translation, so those of us whose Coptic is a little rusty will have to wait a while.

What we do know is that the Gospel of Judas was condemned in 180AD by Irenaus the Bishop of Lyons. So it existed by then and had made its way from Egypt to Gaul.

snip...

It seems the Judas text dates from the same period as the Naj Hammadi texts, 4th century AD, when Gnosticism was being advanced through secret gospels. I suppose that leaves little question as to why these texts were rejected by the bishops!

Bush** didn't give Machiavelli a bad name...that was done by psychologists. But by their standards there is a great deal of Machiavellianism, as well as a high degree of Social Dominance Orientation, in Bush** and his half-baked Neocon cabal -- pointing directly to the cynical and elitist expoundings of Leo Strauss, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. It may imply otherwise--
things were too hot and he had to scramble. Read "Jesus in India" for more interesting theories...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. I will. I know Jesus studied in an Essene 'Mystical' group, and I imagine
that he might have studied in Greece, but I've just recently discovered these things. Having been raised Protestant, I was always under the impression that Christ 'came to earth' already knowing, and not requiring any study. But this is not the case; he was human and then realized his divinity, like the Buddha, the Zen Masters, Hindii(?) saints, and so many others. That is not what is taught in classical Christianity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. I love the wittiness of your title....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. I think it proves that Jesus was a peace activists
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 08:53 AM by DoYouEverWonder
Just like the peace activists in the 60's and even now. Many arrests are pre-planned.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
11. ACLU enters the fray, in the case of Judas v. Christendom
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 09:16 AM by Neil Lisst
Said Judas' agent, Murray Farbstein "I told him not to do that gig."

----------------------------------------------------------

I've always thought Judas was a scapegoat (according to the story, which I'm not saying actually happened.) If you're going to be logically consistent, Jesus and Judas both had ordained roles to fulfill. If Peter denies Jesus three times and still gets to be the first Pope, why should Judas be relegated to Hall of Shame Status?

FREE JUDAS!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC