Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EXECUTIVE ORDER 13292-Can the President declassify any information?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:39 PM
Original message
EXECUTIVE ORDER 13292-Can the President declassify any information?
(c) Delegation of original classification authority.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 13292
- - - - - - -

FURTHER AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE ORDER 12958, AS AMENDED,
CLASSIFIED NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION



<snip>

(1) Delegations of original classification authority shall be limited to the minimum required to administer this order. Agency heads are responsible for ensuring that designated subordinate officials have a demonstrable and continuing need to exercise this authority.

(2) "Top Secret" original classification authority may be delegated only by the President; in the performance of executive duties, the Vice President; or an agency head or official designated pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section.

(3) "Secret" or "Confidential" original classification authority may be delegated only by the President; in the performance of executive duties, the Vice President; or an agency head or official designated pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section; or the senior agency official described in section 5.4(d) of this order, provided that official has been delegated "Top Secret" original classification authority by the agency head.

(4) Each delegation of original classification authority shall be in writing and the authority shall not be redelegated except as provided in this order. Each delegation shall identify the official by name or position title.

</snip>


http://www.fas.org/sgp/bush/eoamend.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does not matter if it can. Not at all.
He outed an NOC agent. Then he LIED to the American People and the CONGRESS in violation of his oath of office.

This is a blowjob, and the Statue of Liberty is wearing the blue dress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Top Secret" original classification authority
Edited on Thu Apr-06-06 01:51 PM by dogday
may be delegated only by the President; in the performance of executive duties


I don't think the Plame Affair has anything to do with official duties unless payback is an official duty....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Exactly what I was thinking...
Edited on Thu Apr-06-06 01:58 PM by IanDB1
otherwise, Clinton could have "de-classified" Roswell to impress horny interns.

"Hey, if you show me a good time, I'll show you a real UFO..."

Sorry, but I know the Freepers are reading this and I know they're big Roswell-freaks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I didn't know that---I have an Area 51 globe
on my desk by the light... I shake it up all the time... :tinfoilhat: :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Its not the declassification, its that he LIED to the prosecutor about it
if he had simply said "Yes, I knew what was going on and I declassified that information before telling Libby to disclose it to the press" - no problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks that is good too nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dubyaD40web Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. But still....
He could have said he declassified this when the case first started. The MSM wouldn't even treat it as news today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. However if he declassified this information and it was not
in the performance of executive duties, such as leaking this NOC's name for vengeance, would it not be news to many????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC