Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lindsey Graham says Bush is innocent because he BELIEVES it was legal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:14 PM
Original message
Lindsey Graham says Bush is innocent because he BELIEVES it was legal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. And I'm 21 again because I BELIEVE I am 21.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. I head that illogical rant! He went on and on about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. VIDEO snip
the Good Faith argument

Sheesh. The asylums are full of good faith mental cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
53. In the words of Chief Wiggum..
Edited on Fri Mar-31-06 11:47 PM by Strawman
I'd have to say this to Graham:

"Well, your story is verrrry compelling, Mr. Jackass."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. That would mean Bush is deranged rather than criminal.
I think the reality might be some of both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. I believed when I was spying in my neighbor's window standing
outside their bedroom and listening night after night that, because they might be talking about harm to me, it was legal for me to do it. I was sincere! I did it in Good Faith! Why are you arresting me for being a Peeping Tom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
55. That is good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ignorance of the law is no excuse, unless you're Junior
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. What a great defense for every DUI in the country!
Edited on Fri Mar-31-06 05:18 PM by rurallib
"Oshifer, I believe I am sober!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. OMFG. What an absurd statement.
I have no words...... :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Lindsey Graham KNOWS...
that Bush believes a lot of shit. Screw what Bush believes and what Lindsey Graham says. Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. And he wants the country to respect him for his great legal mind.
Edited on Fri Mar-31-06 05:21 PM by Fridays Child
:rofl:

Edited to add: Hey, Graham, if B*sh thought it was legal, why did he lie about it in the 2004 campaign? Ever hear of that little thing called "consciousness of guilt," in all the time that you practiced law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Lindsey is a lawyer. Lindsey is legally defining . . .
Bush's assertions/behavior through the lens of "intent" . . . however, what Lindsey is not saying is that he's arguably wrong in criminal law's objective standard re mens rea . . .

In short, Lindsey is parsing legality to sound correct thereby backing his party's president. S'all. Politics is such fun.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. Almost reflexively, Lindsey is defending against an impeachment charge.
After all, if a president is making an inexcusable interpretation of the law, then what better result than to just SAY so with a censure vote? The Labrador Retriever defense is for impeachment or a criminal charge, and it's interesting that Graham is defending Bush from charges that nobody has made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. Yup. I agree. And well said. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalPartisan Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. So if a pedophile believes...
Well, Graham is from South Carolina, so I guess that logic flies...


Sheeesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. The president has a responsibility to know what is legal and what is
not. He has high paid lawyers to tell him if he doesn't know himself. Bush can't hide under that rock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Don't you mean ...
"Bush can't hide under that CROCK!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. or CROTCH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. He SHOULD have CONGRESS to tell him, too.
Edited on Fri Mar-31-06 05:56 PM by Inland
LIke hearings and oversight. But our Congress is AWOL, and when the issue arises in this hearing, Graham won't make a peep. Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. As ignorant as Bush is, he can't use that excuse...He lied about...
"always" going to the FISA court before he taps phones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. So...for those keeping score...Lindsey Graham is lying to cover...
Bush's lying about Bush's illegal activities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. What an idiot. I saw that. Can't we outsource this guy
to Mars? He'd do well in a void.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. I wish I could get Graham to believe he can fly (EOM)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. And Lindsey wasn't suffering from a hangover today
because he believes he doesn't drink :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yy4me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. and if he didn't believe it was legal, he could post his name to a
"signing statement". That would make him innocent because it would now be legal. Good grief, what a bunch of BS. (excuse me, it was one of those days)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. Getting bad legal advice does not save you. Knowing the law is still
an individual responsibilty. The excuse is also flimsy if you only ask for one side of issues and fire any of your lawyers that tell you different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
23. Someone Should Try That On Before A Judge, Sir
The ensuing hilarity would be a pleasure for all on-lookers....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
48. Well, if the "someone" is Lindsey Graham...
or some other Republican, and the judge is Scalia or one of his clones, there might not be much to laugh about...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. Pass the joint
It's now legal because I (and millions of others) believe it should be legal. Joy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
25. isn't he the one who had the virtual debate included
Edited on Fri Mar-31-06 05:35 PM by MissWaverly
in the Supreme Court Brief on the detainees, but he had no debate on the senate floor
that day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
26. Charles Manson and Jim Jones probably believed they were...
Edited on Fri Mar-31-06 05:39 PM by Hubert Flottz
above the law too.

And Bill Clinton believed what he was doing was legal and it was!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
27. If you BELIEVE in Lindsey, clap! Clap, children! Clap! NT
Edited on Fri Mar-31-06 05:40 PM by Benhurst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #27
50. I believe! Praise Jay-Sus!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Just one or two more prayers and the little girl in the lower right-hand
corner will stop picking her nose. PTL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Digging for gold for the Lord! Can I get an A-MEN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paul_fromatlanta Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
28. There are some laws where what you believe matters but
I don't think wiretapping is one of them. Self defense, for example can depend on whether you believed you were in danger.

Consider article 2 section 2 of the impeachment charges against Nixon - it doesn't seem to go to intent.

>He misused the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secret Service, and other executive personnel, in violation or disregard of the constitutional rights of citizens, by directing or authorizing such agencies or personnel to conduct or continue electronic surveillance or other investigations for purposes unrelated to national security<<

Disclaimer: I know the law has been rewritten since then (FISA ).

Disclaimer #2: all the President Bush has acknowledged doing without a warrant is taping incoming foreign calls from terrorists which is a different matter all together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. We already know, that he was spying on Quakers and anti-war...
Edited on Fri Mar-31-06 05:59 PM by Hubert Flottz
protesters and groups and animal rights groups, not connected to the 9/11 terrorists.


Edit...Maybe Mr. Graham should be held to account for not upholding the Constitution and the rule of law like he swore to do? Maybe we should one day hold him accountable for obstruction of justice and as a willing co conspirator?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
30. "Well, let's not do anything about it. There's a war, and it's Friday."
Edited on Fri Mar-31-06 05:52 PM by Inland
"Let's collect our paycheck and go home."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
33. I guess I don't have to pay taxes this year

since I believe what they do with the money is illegal.

Oh, wait, for some reason the law doesn't let people like me do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. We need to codify the Unitary Citizen theory. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
36. I believe when I steal all that money from the bank that I needed
it worse than them, and that I just borrowed it with no intention of paying it back, therefore I am innocent. What a load of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
37. "This crowd in the White House really believes this stuff"
I swear, just that phrase makes me :puke: but - and don't get me wrong here, I am NO fan of Grahams - does he sound skeptical to anyone else? Check liveoaktx's clip - I swear I think he was saying this with a definite smirk in his voice and tongue-in-cheek look on his face.

Not that it excuses him for even bringing up the magical thinking of the "crowd in the White House". Hey, I believe I'm George W. Bush!! What's that asshole doing in MY HOUSE???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
38. Preposterous, like everything else GOP.
It's silly to pretend that the President of the United States, whoever that may be, will have "unlimited powers" until the so-called "War on Terror" is over and "won", which it never will be. The framers of the Constitution are rolling in their graves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drmom Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
39. Yes, the insanity defense...
...if you murder someone, but truly believe that murder is not wrong, then you are acquitted by means of insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
40. and I believe it's legal for me to rob a bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
42. Shouldn't this have its own FISA forum ?
I mean

election fraud forum

9-11 forum

isn't this a so called conspiracy theory too???:wtf:

fairs fair

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
43. Okay. And Clinton never committed perjury, because he didn't
BELIEVE he was having a sexual relationship with Monica. Remember your role in that little bit of American history, Lindsey???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
44. And Hitler truly believed that he was right in eliminating the Jews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
45. Whatever happened to...
"Ignorance of the law is no excuse"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
46. So we are each a law unto ourselves
I believed that your car and your spouse were mine so I guiltlessly had my way with your spouse in your car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. No, No , No !!!
Only REPUBLICANS in OFFICE are a law unto themselves. Everyone else will be prosecuted! For whatever! You need to ask Lindsey Graham about this! He knows!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
49. just another day in the Unreality-Based Community! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
54. And Clinton believed he
didn't have real sexual relations with Monica and therefore, didn't commit perjury - but that was somehow lost on Lindsey Graham.

Just another slimy, rubber-stamp Repug. I haven't forgotten all those self-righteous speeches by Graham during the impeachment hearings, where RULE OF LAW was above all else, and no President was above the law, unless it's George W. Bush, a Repug President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
56. I know a lady who thinks animals talk to her
So, as long as she really believes it, I guess she's perfectly sane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC