Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I've said it before - They're capable of doing anything to hold onto power

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 06:44 AM
Original message
I've said it before - They're capable of doing anything to hold onto power
with the recent revelations of the latest "memo" regarding Bush and Blair's' meeting on how they were trying to figure out how to bamboozle the people into going to war in Iraq....

and Bush's poll numbers sinking faster than the Titanic, with the "war" in Iraq becoming obvious to more and more people as an absolute failure (and to many as outright aggression), with the Taliban regaining ground in Afghanistan....

These criminals are capable of doing anything TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE to retain power.

Operation Northwoods (look it up), the domestic version may be in the works.

They are criminals beyond belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. The real troubling part will be the winner of the 2008 election and
what Bush does. IMHO...

Scenario 1 Repug Wins the WH.

IMHO Bush will have to give up the WH to the repug or the repugs will kill him.

Scenario 2 Dem Wins the WH.

that is what I am afraid of and Bush reaction to it. IMHO he is crazy enough to do anything.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sorry, that's just
absurd. There are practically no scenarios imaginable in which bush can hold on to power after the 2008 elections. I mean really what's he gonna do? Set off a nuke in a major city? Scream and yell and pound his heels on the Oval Office carpet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. You may be surprised at what they will do.
He is after all, a spoiled little brat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Cali, you must mean no LEGAL scenarios in which Bush could
hold on to power.If he felt that he could pull it off, he would simply refuse to step down. If the military, Congress and the Supreme Court sided with him, who would make him leave office? They could simply declare for security reasons there could be succession of Presidents until things "settle down".

This is likely. But, to me, it's easily imaginable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. They are subscribers to the principles of Niccolo Machiavelli

Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527)



"I have composed a little work On principalities; there I plunge as deeply as I can into this subject, discussing what a principality is, what kinds there are, how they are acquired. how they are maintained, why they are lost."
For Machiavelli, Florence was the object of his patrioism, and which he tried to serve with single minded devotion. Unfortunately for him, the days of Floretine greatness were largely past when he reached maturity. Two years after the death of Lorenzo de Medici in 1492, the French invaded Italy and in the ensuring struggles between great powers, Florence was reduced from a first rate Italian power to a second rate power dominated by Spain. The Florentine Republic for which he worked as a high level civil servant was swept away in 1512 leaving him unemployed.

The Prince embodies Machiavelli's response to the Italian crisis of disunity and foreign domination. Out of its pages, as George Bull put it in his introduction to the work, "strides the figure of the autocrat, the new man, ruthless, efficient, and defiant, the literary forerunner of the new monarchs of the sixteenth century."

Machiavelli's aim in the Prince is to tell the new rulers how to remain in power once they have gained it. The best way is to rule well. If this is not possible, then Machiavelli presents a variety of strategems for remaining in power. It is these which have given us the adjective "Machiavellian."

http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/philosophers/machaivelli.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Plus if the dems regain the House and the Senate, this cabal
will be going to jail. I agree - they have no regard for life whatsoever and will do anything to remain in power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. The Reagan cabal never went to jail. I heard several Democrats
say the just let him ride off into the sunset. I'm sure they'll talk about what's "good for the country" and how they can't make a case with all the pardoning * is going to do if he really does get out of office in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. They were petty thieves compared to the Bushco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. come on, he's not that bad. he will leave quietly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. If you look at *
from the point of view of being jealous of his royal ME oil buddies and wanting to be like them (i.e. absolute power over a pseudo-theocratic nation of have-mores and have-nots) then the things he does will start to make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. to go along with this ,here is some interesting reading
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/ToA/ToA.html#TOC
This explains about the Power Control Group in Washington which existed then and probably still does. There are references to back up these writings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC