Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So Bush and Blair had decided on war before sending Powell to UN ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:52 AM
Original message
So Bush and Blair had decided on war before sending Powell to UN ?
According to the report on Keith Olberman tonight, they had set the date of March 10th to invade, 5 days before Powell went with his ridiculous charade before the United Nations. What does it mean?

First of all, they used the United Nations as a front to legitimizing their conspriacy for war that had already been decided. They were going to war no matter what happened or what Saddam did. They were obsessed with war. Both of them lied to the world to begin the war in Iraq. How serious is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. That same report was on several other shows tonight on CNN.
I know the Situation Room covered it, and so did Tweety on MSNBC. The general consensus seems to be that THIS report doesn't add much, except to confirm the Dowing St. memo, and statements from many others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. But it's the confirmation that is important...
It is no longer just a left-wing rumor. It is being confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. And then Colon played out his scripted House Butler line
for his MasterBush.

I remember seeing the assclown on TV at that moment I said ----NO WAY

And so did lots of others here to those RIDICULOUS CLAIMS

NOW TENS OF THOUSANDS HAVE DIED FOR HALLIBURTON, EXXON AND CARLISLE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I don't agree-I did hear Andrea Mitchell attempt to downplay it
by saying that Bush had telegraphed anyway what he planned to do. And I tend to agree with that- I clipped part of the Jan 31 press conference where he flat out said that, regardless of what the UN did about the 2nd resolution, he believed that 1441 gave him the authority to go attack Saddam. And that's what he did. So the press ought to have been HAMMERING on that point, which is, why was Bush bothering to go through some kind of PR motions when he didn't give a feck whether it worked or not?

And it's even MORE important now, because it wasn't just that one time that Bush decided to do whatever he wanted, without regard to law. It's a pattern with him. So, yes, it confirms the memos and adds additional info and is CRITICALLY important info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I agree, liveoak...
we knew already, but it's confirmation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. I thought about the same thing when I saw it just now
They knew that what Powell had planned to say and they knew it was bogus. They knew he would not really convince anyone and therefore would not get a new resolution. Ever hear that old saying "Failing to plan is planning to fail"? They "planned to fail".

They 'penciled in' the start date so that they could begin to move and maneuver things to the areas where they would launch this mess from. The Powell visit to the UN was a smoke screen. Wonder how he feels about it now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. No intention to rain on a parade, but
is this supposed to be news?

I mean, this has been talked about literally for years. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Well, it probably is news to the koolaid crowd at
freak-pubic. The faux startled reaction of warm stream meddlers(WSM,) now that boosh is playing poll anchor, probably adds some zing.

My point is, although this is stale and its outrage value long exhausted, to many of the wide eyed grazers, this is brand new!
To those who are waking up to the lies and incompetence of their godlings, the BFEE, this has to hit hard, plus it is not coming from us-they are tone deaf to the truth from the wrong quarter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. warm stream meddlers ... LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. It certainly wasn't talked about
that Bush despicably actually suggested disguising an American fighter plane to look like it was a United Nations plane hoping it would be fired on. That is hands down the lowest act of any American president in history.

Imagine this scenario...the plane would be prepared with the markings of the U.N. They would fly it slowly over a known artillery position. They would prepare to document through another pilot that it was engaged, or possibly even allow the plane to be hit. They could not allow it to be downed because that would expose the plot when it was discovered that it was an American aircraft.

But they would have been all prepared to immediately broadcast to the news media that a U.N. plane was innocently monitoring the skies and drew fire. That despicable act would then have to have been followed by intentional lies beyond anything comprehensible that the world could ever conceive would be deliberately orchestrated by an American president.

I myself even thought when it first surfaced that this is got to be loaded with tin foil. But now it's in the actual memo and mainstream news.

This has got to blow minds across the world. What tiny bit of respect we may have desperately been hanging has just been annihilated.

Bush is filth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC