Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP falsely reported .. Americans approve of Bush's "wiretapping tactics"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 05:26 PM
Original message
WP falsely reported .. Americans approve of Bush's "wiretapping tactics"
http://mediamatters.org/items/200603150004

from MediaMatters:
<snip>
Summary: Washington Post staff writer Shailagh Murray reported, in an article about Sen. Russ Feingold's censure resolution, that Democrats are "wary of polls showing that a majority of Americans side with the president on wiretapping tactics." Actually, polls consistently show that most Americans disapprove of the wiretapping tactics the administration has used -- specifically, conducting surveillance without seeking or obtaining a warrant.

In a front-page March 15 article on Sen. Russ Feingold's (D-WI) call to censure President Bush for "authoriz an illegal program to spy on American citizens on American soil," Washington Post staff writer Shailagh Murray reported that Feingold's fellow Democrats are "wary of polls showing that a majority of Americans side with the president on wiretapping tactics." In fact, polls consistently show that a majority of Americans disapprove of the wiretapping tactics the administration has used -- specifically, conducting surveillance without seeking or obtaining a warrant.

<snip>
"In fact, most polls show the opposite. A Quinnipiac University poll conducted February 21-28 found that while 79 percent of "American voters say the government should continue monitoring phone calls or e-mail between suspected terrorists in other countries and people in the U.S.," 55 percent say "that the government should get court orders for this surveillance." A CBS News poll conducted February 22-26 asked respondents: "Regardless of whether you approve of the President authorizing the wiretaps, do you think the President has the legal authority to authorize wiretaps without a court warrant in order to fight terrorism, or doesn't he?" Fifty-one percent said the president does not have the legal authority to do so. A CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll from February 9-12 reported that 50 percent of respondents believed the Bush administration was "wrong" to wiretap "conversations without a court order," while 47 percent said it was "right."

Murray appears to have conflated public approval of spying on suspected terrorists with approval of the means through which the Bush administration has conducted the eavesdropping. Approving of the surveillance and approving of the tactics are two very different things. As the polls show, one can believe the president should conduct surveillance on suspected terrorists and at the same time believe that he should obey the law in doing so."

... if this doesn't convince Senators to hop on board and American's will be behind this as a public service - nothing will.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Has anyone done a poll using REAL language?
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 05:50 PM by SoCalDem
The ones I have seen use a negative in the question and a yes/no or agree/disagree in the answer-choices.. I think this is done deliberately because probably most americans cannot figure out HOW to answer.. (the ole double negative thing)..

Someone needs to ask a SIMPLE question..(because americans are pretty simple these days)



Q- Should a president be able to wire tap YOUR phone, open YOUR mail without the approval of a special court?

yes...
no...

because that;s what it ultimately comes down to.. YOUR phone YOUR mail because someone else will do the tipping-off and you will not know about it until AFTER it's been done...when two guys in suits show up to ask you questions..

In the climate we have now, some neighbor who has a beef with you, can call a hotline and say they have seen arabic looking people coming to your house, or that they have seen you acting suspiciously..that's all it takes these days..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Your toe scares the crap out of me........
:scared: :scared: :scared: :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty-Taylor Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Very well put, SoCalDem. Most Americans
need to hear the second-person "your" -- otherwise they can place distance between the illegal act of wiretapping without court order and themselves. The article in the WP proves once again that the MSM still caters to BushCo.

It wasn't so long ago that the Washington Post had real reporters, digging to get the truth. One who comes to mind is Morton Mintz, with whom I once published a co-bylined story in The Nation. They don't make any like Mort anymore. To read him, visit tompaine.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nothing will . . . yet
They really are pretty craven. Bush will have to bleed out more before they dare poke him with a stick.

They just don't get it: NOW is the time to stand up to this tin-pot regime. They will lose the advantage handed to them by 'Lican wickedness and incompetence if they continue to act like cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I agree, I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Sometimes it only takes one person to start
the chain of events in motion... Someone has to be the leader, someone has to take the chance... Then the others will fall in line once they realize the public is wanting this.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. we all know the press likes to fall in line with current public opinion
so lets let them know what we think!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC