Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DHS Threatens Peace Veteran! I LOVE This Man! He Recorded them!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 02:39 PM
Original message
DHS Threatens Peace Veteran! I LOVE This Man! He Recorded them!
I Love you Dwight! :loveya:



http://www.boiseweekly.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid:158729

Red State, Meet Police State

A federal employee gets hassled by Homeland Security for antiwar stickers on his car. Is it a mistake, a new rule, or the part of a trend of the First Amendment being bullied out of existence? Read the transcript, read the rules and decide for yourself....

Dwight Scarbrough's idea of political dissent is one that rubs some people the wrong way. He likes to blame his compulsion for peaceful troublemaking on his birthday: October 2, the same as Ghandi. However, a few of Scarbrough's techniques are all his own--especially when it comes to his truck.

<snip>

On February 7, Scarbrough went to his job like any other day. He is a scientist with a federal agency in Boise--one that is part of the executive branch, ironically--and he parked in his usual spot, just outside of the federal Natural Resource Center on Vinnell Way in Boise, kitty corner to a Wal-Mart, a Lowe's Home Improvement Center and a 21-screen Edwards cineplex. Made up of two large, square brick buildings, the complex houses a variety of federal offices including the Social Security Administration, the Bureau of Land Management, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Immigration and Naturalization Service, among others. But despite the fact that most of the employees in the complex can, at least officially, consider George W. Bush their boss, Scarbrough has taken remarkably little grief for his strident anti-Bush views and props. Even those who don't agree with his message usually tolerate it.

<snip>

Around 2:15 p.m., Scarbrough says, he answered his office phone and found himself talking to a man who identified himself as Officer R. of the Department of Homeland Security. (I'm withholding the officer's name; you know, what with Plamegate and all.) Scarbrough was told that he was in violation of the Code of Federal Regulations, the set of rules that govern all executive departments and agencies, and that he was in danger of being cited unless he came out to the parking lot or let the officer come up to his office. Scarbrough chose the first option, and took along a co-worker--also a veteran--and, being an experienced peace activist, a tape recorder. Downstairs, they found two armed officers with "Homeland Security" insignia patches on their shoulders, waiting for them in large white SUVs. Scarbrough informed the officers that he would record their conversation, and what follows is the transcript of that recording.

Officer: Step back here please.

Dwight Scarbrough: Let's have a seat.

O: I'd like to talk to you.

DS: Let's have a seat........



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why cant this stuff happen to me? I wanna sue and get rich! Dang it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. You can't sue the federal government
At least I think that's the case. Any legal experts out there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. good -- and scary-- article. Thanks for posting.
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 02:48 PM by villager
Good to know some folks are fighting back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yow.
Take one pissy Repug, one semiliterate cop with a bad attitude, and forget about your rights.

Scarborough should have had someone go in and quickly print out the statute from findlaw.com and read it v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y to Officer Dickhead and ask him how it felt to be lied to about what constituted that law by some college boy Repug who knew better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I emailed K.O. at countdown with this
WOW is all I gotta say, WOW

countdown@msnbc.com

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. The SS has been resurrected. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Whoa! This is just the beginning
If the DHS has this power now, imagine what they have planned for the future. The 06 elections are going to be very interesting and scary for dissenters. I'm preparing myself now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good for Dwight!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insane_cratic_gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wow! I hope he gets to tell it to the world.
What's up with them being unable to locate the office the HSO claims to have been from?

When they say signs, Aren't they referring to a picket sign, or a yard sign, not an item attached to a personal piece of property? like a bumper sticker? He wasn't handing out pamphlets, or flyers so he was NOT in violation of the law. Like every other Bush crony of this Admin, they choose to loosely interpret the law to how they see fit. Frankly that was blatant bullshit.

It's my opinion, that was complete and total harassment. I hope Olberman covers it and interviews the guy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. there's an update to the story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Thanks for posting -- great update! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. He should still sue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Thanks, I find the DHS defense exceeds my worst expectations:
On the government's side of things, getting information has proven little easier than it was the first time around. We finally chatted with Carl Rusnok, the spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security, who would only say of the incident, "The officer that originally talked with this gentleman interpreted the laws as he saw them, and that's what's done in the field on a daily basis by all law enforcement."

If they were dealing with dangerous behavior that places other lives at clear and imminent risk, I'd allow this justification. After all, police interpret the law every day when dealing with suspected criminals. Mostly they get it right, sometimes not.

But what the DHS officers were dealing with here was freedom of speech. They cited an ordinance dealing with signs on government property and expanded it on the spot to include the stickers on this gentleman's truck...but not to the stickers on any of the other vehicles in the parking lot.

That in a nutshell is why the government has no business regulating free speech!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Thank you!
<snip>

On the "nothing" front, Scarbrough has continued to park in the same spot, with the same stickers on his truck. He's even added another prominent message to his tailgate, reading "Help save America in 2006. Stop the lies, stop the spying, stop the dying. Impeach Bush and Cheney" in 4-inch high letters. But while Scarbrough may seem to be asking for trouble, he told BW he hasn't had any more run-ins with federal agents.

Scarbrough's attorney, Michael Bartlett of the local firm Nevin, Benjamin and McKay, said of the lack of additional action, "Hopefully, that's some indication that they simply had made a mistake."

Scarbrough's coverage has, however, turned the former submariner into a minor celebrity. After doing a round of national radio shows, and after the story in BW got covered by the magazine The Progressive (we hear there's a forthcoming story in Playboy as well), Scarbrough said he has received numerous letters and e-mails, almost all of which were supportive. "Even if they don't agree with what I say, they at least acknowledge that we have a right to free speech," he told BW.

On the government's side of things, getting information has proven little easier than it was the first time around. We finally chatted with Carl Rusnok, the spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security, who would only say of the incident, "The officer that originally talked with this gentleman interpreted the laws as he saw them, and that's what's done in the field on a daily basis by all law enforcement." He said that the case had been referred to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Boise "to determine if anything further should be done."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samhsarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kick ASS!!!!
I LOVE this guy!!!!!!!!!!!!:bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good for him - throwing it in the face of the Thought Police
This is harassment, pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. Gestapo

The Death's Head emblem similar to Skull and crossbones, often used as the insignia of the Gestapo

snip

The role of the Gestapo was to investigate and combat "all tendencies dangerous to the State." It had the authority to investigate treason, espionage and sabotage cases, and cases of criminal attacks on the Nazi Party and on Germany.

The law had been changed in such a way that the Gestapo's actions were not subject to judicial review. Nazi jurist Dr. Werner Best stated, "As long as the ... carries out the will of the leadership, it is acting legally." The Gestapo was specifically exempted from responsibility to administrative courts, where citizens normally could sue the state to conform to laws.

The power of the Gestapo most open to misuse was "Schutzhaft" or "protective custody" — a euphemism for the power to imprison people without judicial proceedings, typically in concentration camps. The person imprisoned even had to sign his or her own Schutzhaftbefehl, the document declaring that the person desired to be imprisoned. Normally this signature was forced by beatings and torture.


Heinrich Himmler (left) chief of the SS, with Adolf Hitler (right)


Increasing power under the SS

Laws passed in 1936 effectively gave the Gestapo carte blanche to operate without judicial oversight. A further law passed in the same year declared the Gestapo to be responsible for the set-up and administration of concentration camps. Also in 1936, Reinhard Heydrich became head of the Gestapo and Heinrich Müller chief of operations (although Müller assumed overall command after Heydrich's assassination in 1942). Adolf Eichmann was Müller's direct subordinate and head of department IV, section B4, which dealt with Jews.

During World War II, the Gestapo was expanded to around 45,000 members.


Keeping Hitler in power

By February and March 1942, student protests were calling for an end to the Nazi regime. These protests included non-violent resistance of Hans and Sophie Scholl, two of the leaders of the White Rose student group. Despite the significant popular support for the removal of Hitler, resistance groups and those who were in moral or political opposition to the Nazis were stalled into inaction by the fear of reprisals from the Gestapo. In fact, reprisals did come in response to the protests. Fearful of an internal overthrow, the forces of Himmler and the Gestapo were unleashed on the opposition. The first five months of 1943 witnessed thousands of arrests and executions as the Gestapo exercised a severity hitherto unseen by the German public. Student leaders were executed in late February, and a major opposition organization, the Oster Circle, was destroyed in April 1943.

snip

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestapo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. yes indeed, they read the playbook
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. "It Can't Happen HERE"
Get it. Read it. It's online, even:
http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks03/0301001h.html

You have no excuse. Ignore "Demon-Haunted World" because Pastor says it's "worldly", but READ the Sinlcair Lewis book!

The Neo-Cons did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. Darn good reporting by Nicholas Collias ... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. Uh oh, intimidation and illegal threats aren't working
Time to let the rabble know who's really in charge in George Bush's America, methinks. Well, I'll have a chance to find out for myself on Sunday at the big anti-war demonstration. Still haven't decided what I'm going to put on my sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. You know what the most frightening part about this story is?
How many other Americans would have just gone over and removed the signs? How many would have the b's to stand there and argue with those guys? I WOULD! But if my husbanad would have been there, he would have said "Just go take the dams signs off the car and make this go away!"

I know, I've always been a outspoken B!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I agree
Dwight showed extrordinary bravery. I know my husband would have done the same as yours. I would have given them shit too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. kick
v
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
24. This man is guilty of ThoughtCrime. DoublePlusUnGood!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
25. OK, here's ANOTHER illegal spy case---CENSURE this pResident ,you
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 07:01 PM by wordpix2
spineless senators
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. Just passed this on to my army buddies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Right now in Amerika...
you can be detained indefinetly without any rights. You don't have to charged with anything. You can be held in a cell and not be allowed any visitors, even an Attorney. All that the authorities need is to declare that you might be a witness or possible participant in terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. And that is at the discretion of the president. Remember during
the Pinochet years, people just disappeared off the face of the earth? Congress has given bush the ability to drag anyone off the street, do what he wants with them, and he doesn't have to answer for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
29. The War on Dissent
is coming to your home town soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. It is already in my town
on Jan 31, the SOTU address by the ass**, we had a little get together downtown, about a hundred people, where seven people were arrested. It was not good.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
30. I repeat once again: What, if anything, has DHS actually ACCOMPLISHED?
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 08:09 PM by Mayberry Machiavelli
What does it actually do, other than harass peace activists like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran1212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
32. FBI/GEMA guy visited my house yesterday ...
My sister is in Homeland Security; he wanted to meet with the family for background checks. More like he had alternative reasons, but who am I to question the Police these days? They can do anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
34. I wrote Dwight a few weeks ago and he wrote back
Here's my letter:
I just read your story posted on a website called Democratic Underground and wanted to let you know you're a hero with us. I found your email address by googling your name and found your VFP Chapter page.

I just love any man that has a passion for fighting the fascism that's consuming our country. I hope you realize groups like yours are being wiretapped and monitored very closely. I recently read a minute by minute FBI report of a peace group out of Balitmore that was monitored while attending a peace rally in D.C. The description of their cars were given, how many and who were in each car that went to the rally, what their signs said, minute details of their every move. I'm racking my brain trying to remember where I read it...if I remember, I'll be sure to forward it on to you.

Please be careful Mr. Scarbrough and I'm so glad to see you have the ACLU working with you. Best wishes and let's go get those Bush bastards!

(I have this at the bottom of each of my emails)

NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice, and certainly without probable cause. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of the current President.

Here's his response:

Hi Kathryn:

Just wanted to thank you for your support and advice to be cautious. I am, an will continue to be careful. This is a time of fear and doubt for many and I am very fearful for my nation and our citizens that do actually care about real freedom as laid out in the constitution. I hope they are tracking my every move and words because then they are wasting their time on me and not some other poor American.

I am a Navy Submarine veteran and quite fearless in what I am doing to defend our right to FREE SPEECH. As is the case for all veterans, we served for whatever personal reasons to defend the constituition of the United States and it's citizens, not the President (especially a fascist one like GWB) or Congress.

I do have an excellent attorney and law firm that are representing me as needed on a pro bono basis. They all loved this case and are great defenders of the people against BIG BROTHER.

I also liked your statement at the bottom of your message. It is great and very reflective of our times with this fascist regime currently in power. Hopefully we can vote them out of power before they totally ruin our country and relationships with nations and others around the world. We must demand that our foreighn policy related to economic and military abuses be changed.

Anyway, thanks again for your support.

Dwight Scarbrough
President, Chapter 117
Veterans for Peace
Boise, Idaho

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
35. Wow, wow, wow....
The chilling part of this for me is that there is no one to confront after the fact, no one to address about the wrong done to this man. No receptionist, locked doors, no return phone calls - what the hell is going on?

Good for Dwight and his foresight to take his recorder and a co-worker. I think we all need to get tape recorders...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC