Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Women's rights haven't fared well with Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:15 AM
Original message
Women's rights haven't fared well with Bush
Now it's official. Many of you have read my detonations during the past year about the fact American women's cultural progress is in a stall, if not in a freefall. I've written that the number of women in Congress has remained relatively stagnant for the past decade. I've reported on data that prove the percentage of women occupying seats in state legislatures (the training ground for national politics) is down for the first time this decade after three decades of rising rapidly. I've written that women's progress toward CEO status in major corporations is edging forward at a molasses-like pace and the same is true for women on corporate boards.

But now it's official. The Associated Press reports from Rome, "Over the last 10 years, more than a dozen countries have made it easier to get abortions, and women from Mexico to Ireland have raised court challenges to get access to the procedure. The trend contrasts sharply with the United States, where this week South Dakota's governor signed legislation that would ban most abortions in the state. The law is intended to set up a direct legal challenge to Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that made abortion legal."

Of course, abortion rights are not the be all and end all of women's progress. But for decades this nation seemed to have settled on middle ground -- abortion should be legal, but with significant restrictions.

Now, we are "exiting right," retreating from that moderate position to one of extreme conservatism. As a result, I'm beginning to think abortion rights are an increasingly important marker of women's advancement.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/262932_erbe15.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. But, but, we have a veterinarian in charge of women's health issues
Doesn't THAT show how bushco practice their love on women?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreverdem Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. And...
W is for women, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Women's right don't fare well under any repubs. Reagan & Bush 1
worked hard to put women back into the 1800's. Repubs don't like women, don't like the Constitution, & don't like African Americans. Also the middle class or poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. says American women used to be envied--but not any more




.....I remember covering the U.N. Conference on Population and Development in Cairo, Egypt, in 1994 and the U.N. Conference on Women in Beijing, China, in 1995. American women were the envy of the world, with legal, reproductive, economic and cultural freedoms shared only by women in a handful of other nations -- mostly Scandinavian. That is changing.

In just six years, since evangelical Christians took over the Republican Party and thus dominated this president's legislative agenda, American women's rights moved perilously close to those of women in much less-developed nations. Now those rights are about to trail behind those of other Western nations. From the Food and Drug Administration's refusal to approve Emergency Contraception (or E.C.) without a prescription, to this president's Supreme Court picks, to the administration's cryptic effort to unravel Title IX by loosening college reporting requirements, block after building block of women's civil rights have been undermined.

If you believe that to be an exaggeration, consider these other facts as reported by The Associated Press. Nepal, which used to ban abortion altogether, legalized it in 2002 without restrictions during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy and after that allowing it only to protect a woman's life. In Italy, the Vatican is urging Italians to support antiabortion candidates in that country's general elections next month. But Italian women face no real move to overturn Italy's 1978 law, which allows abortion through the third month of pregnancy. The United States is leading the charge, back to the future.

This should not be an issue of national import. This administration has made it one by unraveling decades of momentum. Perhaps after the pendulum swings so far to the right that a 180-degree turn becomes a 360, the revolution back toward progress will ignite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. b-but Pickles said we need to teach girls just to say "no"`
And you're telling me that isn't progress for women????

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC