Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democratic sponsors of Censure - For Bill Clinton (firedoglake)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:02 AM
Original message
Democratic sponsors of Censure - For Bill Clinton (firedoglake)
Bill at Liberal Oasis reminds us that when Diane Feinstein proposed her censure resolution for Bill Clinton's extra-marital blow job she had a number of Democratic co-sponsors who are still in the Senate:

Daniel Akaka
Max Baucus
Byron Dorgan
Dick Durbin
Dianne Feinstein
Daniel Inouye
Jim Jeffords
Ted Kennedy
John Kerry
Herb Kohl
Mary Landrieu
Carl Levin
Joe Lieberman
Blanche Lincoln
Barbara Mikulski
Patty Murray
Jack Reed
Harry Reid
Jay Rockefeller
Chuck Schumer
Ron Wyden

Of course there were four Republican co-sponsors as well: Pete Domenici, Mitch McConnel, Gordon Smith and Olympia Snowe. But we'll just asume that these members of the GOP Ladies' Smelling Salt Society do, in fact, find a little bj action to be more objectionable than illegally spying on American citizens (so complex and hard to wrap their feeble little heads around). So we will just leave them to their lavender-scented hankies and not expect too much of them.

The rest of them -- WTF?

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Weren't they going for censure to thwart impeachment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes but remember that thwarts the purpose of this particular argument
So please don't mention it again.

If there's one thing Democrats and Republicans agree on it's that Demcorats suck!

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Kiss Kiss! God I love ya. I'm gonna keep up with your journal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. LOL! Pretty funny observation actually
It's like Sean Connery's character in "Capone" asking Elliot Ness if he is willing to do what is required to win. Gain the world and lose your soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. That was the original mission of moveon.org
"Censure, then move on..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. that's why
called moveon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Yes, because they could then say that what
Clinton did was wrong, but not worthy of impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkansas Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Please read the other thread on this. You don't know what you are talking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I'm not talking about anything, just quoting Jane from firedoglake
And I see now that someone else posted this story from KOS. Liberal Oasis caught it as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. At least they were doing SOMETHING
Instead of sitting around with their fingers up their butts like they are now.

I see no comparison between what Bush has done and what Clinton did, yet we get nothing from them now. WHY? Why is it a President like Bush can lie, cheat, steal, start wars without cause, make inappropriate appointments, etc., and these people won't do a thing to stop it?

Feingold is the only one with the morals, ethics and courage to stand up for what's right. The rest of them are cowards, and they need to go find something else to do BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT DOING THEIR JOBS! That includes Republicans as well as Democrats! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC