Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question: Why would Iran support IED attacks, if IEDs are done by Sunnis?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BeyondThePale Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:50 AM
Original message
Question: Why would Iran support IED attacks, if IEDs are done by Sunnis?
My understanding was that we blamed IED attacks on Sunni/Bathist/Saddamist insurgents...
My understanding is that Shia Iran supports the Shia majority in Iraq...
So, why would there be a connection between Iran and IED attacks?

I don't get it... (of course, there is not much about this insanity that I do understand)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. It makes complete sense
If you believe Saddam had WMDs & was connected to 911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harpo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. anything to push blame in Iran for the soon to come invasion over there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. It doesn't make sense
It's not even 'truthy'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Shhh, you just blew a hole in Fearless Leader's excuse.
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 08:57 AM by formercia
The administration thinks everyone is stupid enough to believe their crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondThePale Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. I'm sorry, I won't do it again; please don't send me to Gitmo...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watrwefitinfor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. There you go again
Trying to inject logic into the situation.

Wat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. I guess admin is back to not trying to tell "them" apart.
When it suits their purposes, hey, it's a section of the world filled with "them".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Same rationale as Bush: Fight em over there so we don't have to
fight em over here.

Or as the old Middle East saying goes: the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. it's part of the disinformation strategery
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 09:06 AM by Neil Lisst
They start throwing in the connections to Iran, almost as throw away comments, like "made in Iran."

Does anyone get to ask "how do we know? Anything to back that up? Why would the Shia be helping the Sunni insurgents?"

Which are the "terrorists" now, Bush, the ones killing Shiia or the ones killing Sunnis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. Chaos helps them
Sunnis are blowing up Shia, and Shia are blowing up Sunni. It all favors Iran. It keeps the U.S. bogged down with a high commitment of forces which prevents them from marching on Tehran, as well as causing more and more chaos in Iraq, which will eventually favor the Shia side since there are far more of them.

I wouldn't be surprised if there has been talk amongst the Iranian leaders about trying to eventually annex Iraq, though first with a Shia government in place (ala Vichy France).

Now this isn't reason to invade or nuke Iran of course, but it wouldn't surprise me if there is some level of support for IED's from Iran. Not the Iranian people mind you, but certain factions of the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondThePale Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Interesting, although I doubt *'s level of analysis runs that deep!
He is more interested in:
-keeping Americans scared
-creating a new enemy to vilify (to keep Americans scared)
-obscuring the facts to serve his own agenda

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Oh no doubt
1) Keep people afraid, 2) Get people pointing at Iran, 3) Obscure the truth.

Sadly they're very effective. So effective that even most people here on DU don't really grok what's actually going on over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
12. The USA supplied weapons to both sides during the Iran/Iraq war
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 09:19 AM by NNN0LHI
I would be shocked if someone in Iran (maybe not the government?) wasn't selling weapons to ALL sides in Iraq if there was a buck to be made. Iranians are no less businessmen than Americans are.

Same thing goes for Turkey, Jordan, Syria, Saudi Arabia, etc.

I can't figure out whats so hard to understand about this?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondThePale Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Actually Gen. Pace said there is no evidence...
Marine Corps Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff, said today he has no evidence the Iranian government has been sending military equipment and personnel into neighboring Iraq.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/14/AR2006031401083.html

Besides, I think the real issue is that * is using this as a smokescreen to incite anti-Iranian sentiment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. They just have no idea
Is there evidence? No. There probably never could be either. That border is very long, very rugged, and very unpatrolled now thanks to us disbanding the Iraqi army...

I don't think that Iran is loading up trucks with prefab IED's and shipping them to Karbala...well...I guess it's possible, but I highly highly doubt that. Could Iran have sent in a couple of single guys, like our green beret's, to teach the Shia how to make their own IED's? Easily.

Of course that's not what Bush was saying. Bush was practically saying that the roadside bombs in Baghdad are being placed by Iranian soldiers, which is just horseshit. From the begining this government has lied about foreign involvement in Iraq. Most of the shit in Iraq is being done by Iraqi's of one faction or another, while the vast majority of innocent people there cower in fear, or try and figure out how to flee the country which is growing more and more difficult.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Badr Corps and SCIRI
have imported weapons into Iraq. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3769991.stm

Most of the IEDs in Western Iraq (Anbar) originate from the local (Anbar) area. IED Design ideas difuse across Iraq within a few months.

Of course, the real issue is post-invasion and even up till April 2005, there were many armories unsecured by US/Coalition forces. This is because we've only ever had "just" enough forces to stop an all-out civil war but, not enough to stop tribal revenge killing, destruction of mosques, attacks on minorities or safety for US targets... uh, I mean troops.

The * Admin aren't going ot blame themselves for destroying Iraq and failing to provide the military any hope of "success".

This is such a miserable failure.


http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1692347&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
16. please understand that Reason is not a factor here.. Blood enemies who
have a common enemy are allies.

Islam never had a an age of reason.. there was never a Reformation that defined what Islam Is..

it is all left up to who sponsors the Mosque.. the Mosque totally controls the neighborhood. they move in do some charity work and soon everybody who drinks out of the well they put it is strong armed into sending their children to Arab Islamic School where they will memorize the Koran word for word in a language they may not speak.. they will endure 5 years of brainwashing from age 5.

the enemy of my enemy is my friend.. till that enemy is vanquished at least.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_hurley Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
18. ***PETITION TO SIGN: NO WAR WITH IRAN ***
Hello,

For the past year, the growing tensions mounting between the US, Israel, and Iran are reaching a point where military action against Iran is w/in months of becoming reality. The repercussions are terrifying as such military action could involve countries such as China and Russia as they share massive energy/economic interests w/ Iran. The most likely scenario we would face would be the collapse of the US economy as the combination of a massive rise in oil prices and a run on the US dollar would surely be the weapon many countries would use to fight back against a preemptive US or Israeli strike.

For a collection of articles and resources on this subject you can visit this link: http://reseaudesign.com/research/iran/iran_summery.html

I'm starting up a petition which I will be sending out to as many members of Congress as possible. I'm asking for help to get this signed by as many people, possible in the next month. Send it to as many people you can.

http://www.petitiononline.com/n0war1rn /



Also, here is another petition you can sign from another group:
http://stopwaroniran.org/statement.shtml


Thanks for your time

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC