Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can Stephen Hadley be impeached?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 11:36 PM
Original message
Can Stephen Hadley be impeached?
I'm curious: Can Stephen Hadley be impeached?

He took responsibility for the 16-word lie in Idiot Son's State of the Union Speech, saying that CIA Director George Tenet had warned him the "intelligence" was suspect.

He said he should have made sure it was deleted from the SOTU speech.

But here's the real kicker....

AFTER the SOTU speech, Hadley continued to make the false claims about Iraq's desire to acquire enriched uranium.

In a February 2003 op/ed in the Chicago Tribute, Hadley wrote:

"According to British intelligence, the regime has tried to acquire natural uranium from abroad. It is also trying to import and develop specialized magnets, high-speed balancing machines and other hardware needed to build the centrifuges that can produce enriched uranium. Through front companies, Iraq has tried recently to import high-strength aluminum tubes with tolerances suitable for centrifuges -- and that far exceed the requirements for conventional weapons."

Why did Hadley say the 16 word lie should have been removed, but yet continued to make that very assertion after the speech?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liam_laddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Any federal officer can be impeached...
IIRC the wording in the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks. I was wondering about his role as a Presidential "adviser."
His official title is "Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs" (commonly known as National Security Adviser).

And National Security Advisers are not subject to the confirmation process. And since he was not subject to the confirmation process, I was wondering if he was a "covered" person as far as impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC