Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

About that Rebellion.... (NY Times)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 07:36 AM
Original message
About that Rebellion.... (NY Times)
It's good to see the Grey Lady return to its job - speaking truth to power. It appears they did not like being played for fools by this Administration over holding onto the NSA story thru the last election. They were fooled once but don't appear to be ready to be fooled again. I hope their return is for real.
===============================================================================================

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/11/opinion/11sat1.html

<snip>

Yes, the Republicans defied President Bush on the United Arab Emirates ports deal. But it wasn't over a major principle, like the collapse of Congressional supervision of the executive branch or the incredibly lax security in the nation's ports, or even the security issues posed by this particular deal.

The Republicans dumped the ports deal into the harbor because of xenophobia and electoral tactics. Republican pollsters have been saying the president could be a liability in the fall elections, so lawmakers posed as rebels for voters who, they think, want rebels. They know those voters are unhappy about globalization, and specifically hostile toward Arabs.

The idea that a happy few are charging the White House ramparts is ridiculous. Republican lawmakers don't just turn a blind eye when they learn that the president is making profoundly bad choices, like cutting constitutional corners, abrogating treaties and even breaking the law. They actually legalize the president's misdeeds.

Take domestic spying, held up as another area of Republican revolt. The program violates the law. Congress knows it. The public knows it. Even President Bush knows it. (He just says the law doesn't apply to him.) In response, the Capitol Hill rebels are boldly refusing to investigate the program — or any other warrantless spying that is going on. They are trying to rewrite the law to legalize warrantless spying. And meanwhile, they've created new subcommittees to help the president go on defying the law.

....more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting this.
This nails it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I like it when the NY Times is on the same page as we are...
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Great article!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. We've always known they could do it..
if they wanted to. Alas, as heartened as I am to see this, I shall have to wait until I have eaten the pudding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. best line: "With rebels like these, who needs loyalists?"


After 9/11, Mr. Bush created a network of prisons outside the American legal system so he could hold people indefinitely without any hearings. When the Supreme Court said twice that he was reaching beyond his powers, the Republicans in Congress were determined not to let this assault on the rule of law continue. So they rose as one, and legalized the president's actions. In case there was any confusion about its resolve, Congress told the courts that they could no longer rule on these matters. Mr. Bush got the message, loud and clear. He sent his lawyers right out to inform the judges, including the Supreme Court, that they had to drop all the cases that were already before them.

And all this does not even include the act of open rebellion by which the Senate is helping the White House cover up the hyping of intelligence on Iraq.

With rebels like these, who needs loyalists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Why do you call it the 'Grey Lady"???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. She has been the "Grey Lady" for a long time...
Not flashy or tabloidy.. but stolid and respectable. The kind of paper one could be "seen with" in public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. Can the Congress be held accountable for being an accomplice
to a crime? It's so obvious that the Republicans are the party of corruption, and now they're trying to legalize the President's corruption. At some point, when America finds its center again, can what the Republicans in Congress are doing not only be overturned, but tried?

I think it's important that we do because Cheney, being behind Iraq and the UAE Port deal and probably the wire-tapping, will continue his criminal machinations until he's stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. Someone said that revolutionaries who survive become statesmen and
sedition becomes law, if you wait long enough.

Are we the New American Establishment?

Perish the thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC