Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oceans in Trouble: contact senators re: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:14 PM
Original message
Oceans in Trouble: contact senators re: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Act
Bill is S.2012

http://www.patagonia.com/enviro/oaw/magnuson_stevens.shtml?sssdmh=dm23.79458&project=oaw2

snip: Our oceans are in serious decline and need help now. Overfishing, marine habitat destruction, coastal development and pollution are pushing our ocean systems to the brink of collapse. Congress now has the opportunity to reverse this current course by reauthorizing and strengthening the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA), the primary law governing fishing in U.S. ocean waters. This opportunity only comes once every 10 years, so the Senate needs to hear from you today!

The bill created to reauthorize MSA, S. 2012, contains important provisions that will strengthen the environmental protections in the MSA, originally enacted in 1976. However, there are significant ways that the Senate can further strengthen S. 2012. The most important changes include strengthening the provisions in the bill requiring fishery managers to adopt annual catch limits consistent with the recommendations of independent scientists, and holding managers accountable if they exceed these limits. Because the bill is reauthorized only once a decade, now is the time to tell our Senators to make these important changes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. And it's Alaska's far-right ANWR-screaming Senator
none other than Uncle Ted Stevens, who is co-sponsor. It's a good act; fortunately, I know my other Senator, Lisa Murkowski, is far enough into Ted's pocket to vote yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The one thing I can think of that Ted's done right. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah, he rocks on this one. He's pushed to protect the
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 06:18 PM by northofdenali
fisheries for years. Believe it or not, he wasn't a bad guy back in '72 when he was first elected (after Nick Begich and Hale Boggs were killed in a plane wreck). I had a HS graduation "congrats" note from him that year, written on recycled paper.

Power corrupts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I've been here since '75...
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 06:42 PM by Blue_In_AK
I remember "good" Ted, too. When HUD sold me my present home with a very bad roof that they covered up and lied to me about, his office seriously went to bat for me with the HUD guys in DC. Didn't do any good, but at least he tried. I've voted for him several times, but I've been very disappointed with him of late. It's kind of ironic that both Ted and Don Young hold their positions because of the deaths of Democratic congressmen (Bob Bartlett in the Senate and Nick Begich in the House). That's why I keep reminding people that Alaska was once Democratic and could be again. Our state is certainly not a lost cause, no matter how it appears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I wish there were a lot more of us old-timers, Blue
once the pipeline boom hit and the oil companies started importing their neocon oil workers from the South, things went to shit, at least here in Fairbanks. I think back on the pre-pipeline boom with strong nostalgia, even though the state, and everyone else, was broke.

Unless we can keep some of our young folks, which I don't see happenening unless they're employed by the oil or fisheries industries, most hope of "liberalizing" Alaska is gone. I'm not giving up, nor will "they" run me out, but I do despair at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC