Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Abortion in colonial times: does anybody have any good info...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Rex_Goodheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:30 PM
Original message
Abortion in colonial times: does anybody have any good info...
on what the founders might have thought about the matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Che_Nuevara Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Most of the founders were Puritans.
I doubt they would have been in favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. BULLSHIT!
Puritans were no longer a religious force in the colonies by the time of the revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. The Puritans arrived here many years before.
As someone has pointed out, the "founding fathers" were not Puritans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. Exactly, my 11th great grandfather was a Puritan, my 8th great grand
father who fought at Monmouth, NJ. had long forgotten Puritanism.

I'm pretty sure that my 11th great grandfather's daughter, Damaris, cared a lot more for her seagoing love from Connecticutt, than the Puritan rules at Southampton.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prodigal_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Depends upon the colony
New York had its first bar before it had its first church.

The founding fathers, i.e., the revolutionaries, probably held varying beliefs regarding abortion, and considering the notorious sexual reputations of both Franklin and Jefferson, I'm sure there were some Franklins or Jeffersons that didn't come to term.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. They often made a women pay if she had a child in less than 9 months.
I do not think they took size into it. It was from sin. They also dunked women or some such thing for sex out side of marriage. You can find that is old town police reports which are really fun to read. These great towns that were going yo be run like they said just did not work. Seems sin has been around for ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. In fact, abortion was both common and legal at the time
It's covered in the Roe v Wade decision itself....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjornsdotter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. It was a woman's issue

Handled by other women, men were rarely involved.

There is a great book about the life of women in the US....I'll have to look for the title and author.

Cheers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. All through history women have been up to such things.
Death was also high in birth years for women. None of this should be judged in our time and frame of mind. They did not look at things the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. It was one of the things that got you burned for witchcraft
was being the old crone at the edge of the woods who took care of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. The life begins at conception meme is fairly recent.
most people throughout history considered that life began when a mother could feel the fetus's "kicking".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dissent Is Patriotic Donating Member (793 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yes, it is called "quickening"
Terminating a pregnancy was only considered immoral after "quickening."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. And quickening is actually biblical
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. That is biologically irrational...life begain eons ago
And it has been passed along from generation to generation ever since.

The abortion issue hinges not on when life began but WHEN is it that a fetal existance has rights of personhood under the law?

Wherever that point is placed it is going to be a legal decision, NOT a biological decision.

I personally think that defining legal persons as those that are biologically independent of a placental attachment to the womb is a pretty good approach. That is also consistent with tradition and existing law including Roe v. Wade.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. You might check this title I found on FindLaw.com
AN IMPORTANT STUDY OF THE HISTORY AND LAW OF THE ABORTION RIGHTS CONTROVERSY:
A Review of Hull and Hoffer's New Book on Roe v. Wade
By PAUL FINKELMAN
----
Friday, Sept. 28, 2001

N.E.H. Hull and Peter Hoffer, Roe v. Wade: The Abortion Rights Controversy in American History (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2001).

It is hard to imagine a better introduction to the problem of abortion and American constitutional law than N.E.H. Hull and Peter Hoffer's recent work on Roe v. Wade. Hull, a Distinguished Professor of law and history at Rutgers-Camden Law School, and her husband Hoffer, a Distinguished Professor of history at the University of Georgia, have written an impressive, clear, and easily understood history of the 1973 decision.

The book is neither preachy nor opinionated. Doubtless, some readers will come away from the book annoyed because it doesn't support their preconceived positions or moral outlook. But anyone seriously interested in the subject will find this a gust of fresh air.

An Eye-Opening Discussion of Abortion Throughout History

Long before the invention of the condom or the pill, women were taking herbal remedies and other folk medicines to successfully terminate unwanted pregnancies. In ancient Rome, and traditional native American societies, abortions were commonplace and legal.

In colonial America, abortions were also common, but kept secret because most of the colonies prosecuted fornication. Thus, an unmarried girl or woman needed to keep her abortion secret to hide her earlier illegal act: sexual intercourse.

<obviously, much more>...................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex_Goodheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. Here you go.....
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0195026160/002-6857220-6187231?v=glance&n=283155

Abortion in America : The Origins and Evolution of National Policy (Galaxy Books) (Paperback)
by James C. Mohr


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10297561&dopt=Abstract

PIP: Abortion was frequently practiced in North America during the period from 1600 to 1900. Many tribal societies knew how to induce abortions. They used a variety of methods including the use of black root and cedar root as abortifacient agents. During the colonial period, the legality of abortion varied from colony to colony and reflected the attitude of the European country which controlled the specific colony. In the British colonies abortions were legal if they were performed prior to quickening. In the French colonies abortions were frequently performed despite the fact that they were considered to be illegal. In the Spanish and Portuguese colonies abortion was illegal. From 1776 until the mid-1800s abortion was viewed as socially unacceptable; however, abortions were not illegal in most states. During the 1860s a number of states passed anti-abortion laws. Most of these laws were ambiguous and difficult to enforce. After 1860 stronger anti-abortion laws were passed and these laws were more vigorously enforced. As a result, many women began to utilize illegal underground abortion services. Although abortion was legalized in 1970, many women are still forced to obtain illegal abortion or to perform self-abortions due to the economic constraints imposed by the Hyde Amendment and the unavailability of services in many areas. Throughout the colonial period and during the early years of the republic, the abortion situation for slave women was different than for other women. Slaves were subject to the rules of their owners, and the owners refused to allow their slaves to terminate pregnancies. The owners wanted their slaves to produce as many children as possible since these children belonged to the slave owners. This situation persisted until the end of the slavery era.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex_Goodheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. I know it wasn't made illegal in any states until the mid/late 1800's
During the mid 1800's the US abortion rates were very similar to those during the 70's. Abortionist used to advertise in the daily papers and it was an open and lucrative business. Then in the late 1800's they began to claim fear for the womens safety that were undergoing abortions and things began to change.

Odd isn't it, that this has become such a political issue with todays Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Lots of back and forth on it
There wasn't much in the way of contraceptive methods, and birthrates were correspondingly high....which would suggest that abortion was not all that common back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Sure it was
You just didn't hear about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I doubt it....n/t
.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjornsdotter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. Great book
It may give you some insight and surprise you. Colonial women had a lot more rights than you would imagine.

Cheers

America's Women : Four Hundred Years of Dolls, Drudges, Helpmates, and Heroines (Hardcover)
by Gail Collins

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0060185104.01._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-dp-500-arrow,TopRight,45,-64_AA240_SH20_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex_Goodheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. Sunshine for Women (Abortion with Attitude) -link for history of
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex_Goodheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Wow, great site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrat 4 Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
25. I can't provide a link but a women's issues class I took at U of L
three years ago discussed this issue at length. The text and the professor discussed that abortions were common place up until the middle of the 1850s. They were not outlawed because of religious considerations but for economic (surprise, surprise!) reasons.

Even the Catholic church had no problem with abortions until they started seeing a decline in birth rates which conversely led to a decline in church rolls. (The Catholic Church is quite comfortable to change the rules according to economics - at one time even priests and the pope was allowed to marry, have families, etc. You think economics played a part in the decision for priests and nuns not to marry? Maybe?)

To show how times have changed, I know for a fact that in my small home town a small Catholic run hospital routinely (1950-1960s) sterilized poor and mentally slow women - some without their knowledge - for years. The good nuns knew these women could not support or care for more children and they took steps to help them. This was long before birth control pills but it happened. I don't agree with the secrecy of doing this to women without their knowledge but can you imagine a Catholic hospital even considering what is best for a woman or her family nowadays?

Seems doctors of the 1850s were upset that a procedure they felt they should be performing was going to midwives, etc. Not only were midwives delivering babies they thought they should be delivering, the midwives were preventing pregnancies, again, an economic issue for the good doctors. A move by well heeled doctors to restrict both abortions and mid-wife deliveries were instituted and eventually abortions were outlawed.

That said, I wish I had my old book or even my class notes because they would give me the text and referencing. If I get a chance I'll go dig around in the basement to see if I can locate the stuff. Hopefully someone here at DU will have some cites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. That's what I was taught also
Your detailed recollection was much better than mine.

20 years ago I never expected to be fighting for our legal right to choose in 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. yes, me too
It is frustrating to have to do this all over again. But necessary. I got a new Planned Parenthood shirt and have been wearing it quite a bit.


I used to escort at clinics before and during the Op. Rescue days and it was not a pretty sight.

sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. Depends on where and when
Attitudes and practices varied a lot. The only reference to legal abortions I can recall offhand is in mid-19th century New York: the recent book New York Night quotes some contemporary advertisements for abortionists c. 1840. In other places, it may have been illegal, bur IIRC some large percentage of Puritan brides were pregnant at their weddings (sex with one's betrothed was more or less acceptable, although premarital sex in general was frowned upon)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
30. I have posted this before but it is somewhat germane
to this conversation. My paternal grandmother confided in my mother that many times during her marriage she had what were known as "menstrual corrections." It sounded like she was describing a D & C. This would have been the end of the 19th C. I know she never used birth control, and evidently this was quite common. If her period was late, she went to the doctor and he corrected it. I don't think the concept of a baby was addressed at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC