Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Say What: Condom joke backfires

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 01:47 AM
Original message
Say What: Condom joke backfires
Say What: Condom joke backfires

Press-Telegram wire reports
Long Beach Press Telegram

PHILADELPHIA — When college freshman Janet Lee packed her bags for a Christmas trip home two years ago, her luggage contained three condoms filled with flour devices that she and some friends made as a joke.

Philadelphia International Airport screeners found the condoms, and their initial tests showed they contained drugs. The Bryn Mawr College student was arrested for alleged drug trafficking and jailed. Three weeks later, she was released after a lab test backed her story, The Philadelphia Inquirer reported Thursday.

Lee filed a federal lawsuit last week against city police, seeking damages for pain and suffering, financial loss, and emotional distress. She was arrested on Dec. 21, 2003, and was held on $500,000 bail and faced up to 20 years in prison had she been convicted of the drug charges.

(snip)

Lee's lawyers, former prosecutors David Oh and Jeremy Ibrahim, say that either the field test was faulty or someone fixed the results.

(snip)

http://www.presstelegram.com/news/ci_3354935

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. W's new America. Osama is smiling
all because of W
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
98. Oh bull fucking shit
Anyone would get jailed until the details were worked out. It's a stupid thing to do under any Presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #98
116. Oh bull fucking shit yourself. The field test should have been
positive for drugs. Flour wouldn't have done that. The police did that on purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Uh...
I'm not the most tolerant of folks when it comes to authority figures, but I think it was reasonable to assume she was carrying drugs. Now, if they can provide evidence that the police "spiked" the condoms, she has a case. Otherwise, sorry kid, you should have thought this one through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
36. Three weeks in jail?
You can tolerate them not discovering that flour was flour for three weeks? I'd understand if she had a history of drug arrests, but otherwise, she should own that town when her lawyers are done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #36
90. Sorry, given how backed up most
state crime labs are, three weeks was pretty good. If you do not want to run into these problems, you shouldn't board airliners with condoms full of white powder. You also shouldn't try to get aboard with alarm clocks stuffed with Play-Doh. Some people may jump to conclusions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #90
111. I'm still clinging to the "innocent until proven guilty" mentality
Cops should have had to prove it was an illegal substance before locking someone up. Sue the cops, make the city file for bankruptcy, maybe they'll respect the citizens next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #111
112. Ah, she wasn't found guilty
Edited on Sun Jan-01-06 12:07 AM by Kelvin Mace
She was charged with a crime, arraigned and failed to post bail. That is the way the systems works, whether you are charged with murder or serial double-parking.

She was from out of state and did something incredibly, mind-bogglingly stupid. She got caught. The initial field test was positive and she was booked. Bail was set high because she was from out of state.

As a person who has sued a police department for criminal acts (and won), I am not the most sympathetic ear for them. But try as I might, I cannot see error in this situation (unless they spiked the test).

She had white powder in several condoms, which is the way drugs are sometimes smuggled. The drug field test was positive. Were they just supposed to wave here through?

If you walk into a bank with a replica shotgun and a ski mask, people will jump to conclusions.

If you want have a discussion about the idiocy of drug laws, we'll have much to agree on, but I can't find fault in this situation. Sometimes, just sometimes, life makes you pay dearly for being stupid. It doesn't happen often enough for my tastes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. what sort of test shows flour and latex as a drug?
that's my question. if this was an accepted test, carried out within normal procedures, then I'm with KM here, stupid decision, kiddo, and the wheels of justice spat you back out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Have you seen 'Maria Full of Grace'?
I think they thought these were tubes of heroin and bullshitted her in the hopes she would confess while they waited for the test results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. probably coke, not heroin
and you can field test for cocaine very easily, and very cheaply. and no judge would arraign someone for drug trafficking without a positive field test, I wouldn't think. She says 'it is flour' and unless the DA has something to show it isn't flour, 500 grand of bail seems unlikely.

The initial arrest without a field test, fine, but a three week hold? which, since bail was mentioned, included at the very least an arraignment? something's fishy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
37. My mistake on the heroin.
I know nothing about the drug trade and am not an attorney so forgive my ignorance here. Perhaps they thought they had her on drug charges and held her until they eliminated all possibilities? After watching 'Maria Full of Grace' my impression is that drug trafficking is a huge problem that we are woefully ill-equipped to handle. Maybe she got caught in a bureaucracy that is poorly designed to catch bad guys. I don't know....just asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #37
44. fair enough
worth noting that these were not swallowed pellets, but in her bag.

and you are right, we have no handle on drug trafficking, and we never will. as long as there is money at stake, and we're talking billions of dollars, smugglers always do just a little bit better than the guards. So has it always been.

MFoG was a fine film, shows a lot of a damage that the US appetite for cocaine is doing to our neighbors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #44
57. I think those pellets got them interested in her to begin with
and those pellets had to have looked very suspicious to people who were looking for drugs.

MFoG opened my eyes to the real problems in the drug trade and our inability and to handle them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Everyone involved with those "initial tests" should be fired...
If they screw up that badly over fucking flour-filled condoms... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Agreed, flower in condoms don't equate to drugs
America has turned crazy under W.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. this has nothing to do with W
the asinine war on drugs predates him by decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
63. The whole paranioa thing is a W result. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. For argument's sake...why would you do this?
Unless you knew the screener personally, what's the point of this "Jackass"-type stunt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Do you choose to dictate a PC humor
Edited on Sat Dec-31-05 02:15 AM by Erika
that outlines what is funny with kids? W's affects are everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Huh? Please rephrase...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. rephrase what? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Do I choose to dictate humor? Is that what you're asking?
No, I just want to know why anybody would do this, whether it was intended to be funny or not. Not dictating anything to anyone. At least, that's what I think you're getting at. I don't think too many people would find pretending to transport narcotics lotsa laffs, especially to the authorities. That's just stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Who said they were pretending to do that?
Did I miss something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. LOL! Yeah, I really think you did miss something! n/t
Edited on Sat Dec-31-05 02:39 AM by Hobarticus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #22
64. I don't. Paranoia running rampant. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #64
67. Don't forget hyperbole, too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
118. Pretty stupid idea
To get on a plane with condoms full of flour.

Seems like they could have figured out sooner than three weeks that it was flour, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. TSA agents should not waste time with drugs
I was afraid this would happen, TSA agents, who should be looking for bombs, weapons and terrorists, waste time going after somebody who allegedly has a few vials of white powder. Nobody's security in that airport is jeopardized by that, even if it was cocaine.

The girl and her friends used bad judgement, but this should have been a moot point. Drug inderdiction just isn't on my A list of priorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. But the powder could have been anthrax
when paranoia is released, it is released. Osama is happy in W's America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
29. I guess you didn't get the memo
Edited on Sat Dec-31-05 02:43 AM by impeachdubya
it's way more fun to use all these great patriot act powers and this jacked up terra hysteria to go after non-violent drug offenders than it is to use 'em on actual terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #29
39. You're right. Was the sin having condoms or flour?
The Patriot Act is very vague on which crime could harm us the most. You know, even the Pope is calling the condom "dangerous and UnGodly".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MazeRat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
13. She and her friends are idiots... don't joke with these people...
They are on a mission from God, have a power complex, and such things will get your ass thrown in the pokey (unless of course you are not very informed about the current state of our nation). As for "suing for damages, pain and suffering, blah blah blah"... what a joke. She and her friends brought this on herself and the suit should be thrown out. If anything she should have to pay for wasting everyones time, energy, etc.

Damn... people are stupid.

MZr7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Packing condoms with flour has something to do
with a power complex? Maybe you should hear what a lot of people put in their suitcases. So now, you are saying that condoms with flour packed in them in your personal suitcases should cause you to pay and list you as irresponsible . OK. What happened to America?

Please print the PC materials here on what is correct or incorrect to pack in your personal luggage. No wonder so many of my friends are absolutely refusing to fly. W and Osama has overtaken the airports with a heck of a lot of enablers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MazeRat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. No....
Edited on Sat Dec-31-05 02:29 AM by MazeRat7
The state of things is that those doing the screening, law-enforcement, et al have a collective "power complex". You know.. an all driving urge to keep us safe from the "terrar-ist". But that is beside the point, what they did was stupid. And then to sue because they were mistreated by a bunch of high-school grads for their stupidity....well that is just silly. *grin.

MZr7

on edit: I won't fly either if I can avoid it... for this and many other reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. They have the right to be stupid, don't they?
I think they were being silly. Would you rather they be controlled by fascist rules? Please issue what you feel is PC for them to carry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MazeRat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. You teasing right ?
She made bad choices. She got busted for those choices. Now she wants to sue because her "choices" didn't go over well? Hey, she is a grown-up (over 18 I suppose) let her figure out what she can/can not carry on a plane. Today the reality is if you carry something like that on a plane you will get busted. Thats Fine if you want to make a political statement about "fascist suppression". But don't turn around and try to sue for damages (eg $$$) because you were stupid and wanted to make a statement.

And no I hate rules.. but I know how to play the game until they get changed or I find a work-around.

MZr7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #26
35. Intent is an essential part of every crime. She did not have the criminal
intent required for any crime for which she was charged.

it's absurd to think that she should be punished criminally for any of this.

Also, it's ridiculous that our criminal justice system doesn't have mechanisms that prevent the victims of practical jokes from being punished as criminals...like, say, accurate drug tests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #35
43. You're living in Osama and W times
There is no such thing as humor. Every condom and pinch of flour could be deadly weapons. (Their backpack may carry the drone to deliver it to NYC or LA)
We can never be too careful in these dangerous times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #43
92. What's the name of the crime she committed?
And what level of intent does it require?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #35
46. she wasn't punished criminally
she was never indicted or tried, when the follow up tests cleared her, she was released from jail and the charges dropped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. How nice. Just told to be more PC the next time
so she could pass the Osama and W test.

People, we're looking like fools to the rest of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #46
94. I'm criticizing the argument that she committed a crime.
Edited on Sat Dec-31-05 11:58 AM by 1932
However, I will add to my argument above that 21 days in jail is a long time to be detained when the police had in their possession the evidence that should have proven that no crime was committed. There are probably a lot of crimes that wouldn't result in that much jail time.

I do think she has an argument that police negligence resulted in substantial damages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #35
87. So if I bring a fake bomb into an airport, it's OK if it's just a "joke"?
She made the incredibly stupid choice to put a white powder into condoms and take them through airport security. She deserves to enjoy the consequences of that decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #87
96. If YOU intended to bring a fake bomb to the airport, I bet there's a
criminal statute that you would have broken, and you would have satisfied the required level of intent for a conviction.

When someone puts a fake bomb in your bag as a joke, you have not committed a crime.

Every criminal statute identifies the level of intent that is required for a conviction. RECKLESS homicide is a crime in many states. Most statutes require that you INTENDED to commit the act. When you had no intention to commit an act (or you acted in self defense, or if you believed there was some reasonable justification for your action) you're not going to be convicted.

When you didn't even know the shit was in your bag, you can't be convicted.

Some people who have shit placed in their bags are convicted, but it's not because they got set up. It's because juries don't believe that you were set up. In this case, I suspect the woman's friends admitted they put the condoms in her bag, so there's no question that she didn't commit a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #87
101. Your positions favours the authority. okay.

I can understand that. Everyone wants to be looked after.

It seems a little strange to *me*, however, that from your tone you seem to think that the consequences are somehow concrete and immutable rather than the result of policy or a series of decisions. Do you feel that figures in authority have any responsibility for their power over the ordinary citizen, or are we responsible for our own actions and also the actions of figures in authority? If so, whose actions are the figures in authority responsible for? If not their own, this perhaps sets a dangerous precedent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #26
49. Having flour in a condom is not a crime...
She didn't get busted because of her "bad choices." She was falsely arrested because of a)incompetence or b) fraud on the part of the cops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #26
81. Since when are condoms and flour banned on planes.
This is the first I've heard of it. Who's ever heard of drug smugglers packing condoms with cocaine and putting them in their luggage? Swallowing them, maybe but in their luggage? That's too ridiculous for words. These screeners, police and lab personnel should be fined, fired and laughed out of town.

Busted for condoms and flour! There's no end to the stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. You're right.
I should be able to transport replicas of bombs, or carry life-like weapon replicas on planes...otherwise, my rights are being trampled. It's wrong for the police to stop and detain me if they find condoms stuffed with a white powder on my person. Following common sense is enabling W and Osama. Right on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Get real. Condoms filled with flour by a college student?
Osama and W have won. You've lost America through your unreasonable paranoia and given their enablers support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. You can't be serious...
I have to assume you're kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. About American kids being kids? Perfectly serious.
Now do you want to submit your PC manual for their regulation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #31
41. Seriously, now....you're joshing, right?
This isn't a case of PC, it's common sense. Surely you can discern the difference between the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #41
45. That condom and pinch of flour could be deadly
These college kids should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for committing such a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #41
51. Sometimes PC is more important than common sense.
If somebody wants to joke about something, the freedom to joke
is more important than the consequences of the joke if it goes
bad. To not do the joke once they thought of it would be giving
up the liberty of joking to the war on terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #51
59. When was the last time an American Girl committed a
terrorist act? You need to shake yourself and wake-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. What are you talking about, I agree with you.
It is necessary sometimes to do what may be stupid in
order to exercise your freedom. What those youngesters did
is a action of courage and that it was a joke or not is
not important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #60
69. Was it supposed to be private? Yes
American kids have a right to privacy and humor. What was stupid was the assumptions of the authorities, NOT the acts of the kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #69
71. That's why they HAD to do it once they thought of it.
KID1: Let's put condoms and flour in your suitcase.
KID2: What about W, war on terror, paranoia?
KID1: Huh? What's that got to do with it?
KID2: Exactly, but that's why we can't do it. What if they
find it and the test goes bad intentional or not, and somebody
goes to jail for three weeks?
KID1: That shouldn't decide if we want to do something that is
not against the law, funny or not.
KID2: So if we don't do it now, we're giving in to W, the
paranoia, etc?
KID1: Yes.
KID2: Then we have to do it. No matter what happens, we could regret
it if we don't do it just out of either our paranoia or theirs.
KID1: OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #59
88. When was the last time before 9/11 that some Middle Eastern males hijacked
and crashed four planes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #59
97. When was the last time an American Girl smuggled cocaine?
It happens every day, and is happening right now somewhere.

This has nothing to do with W, 9/11, or terrorism. Cocaine in the condom is what this is about. Do you realize how many people have been busted over the years for cocain filled condoms on airplanes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aaronnyc Donating Member (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #97
107. Thank you
Finally, someone who gets it. I've read this entire thread, and keep seeing this somehow related to W's "War on Terror" - when clearly this should be compared to the "War on Drugs", which was going on well before Bush ever became president. Nobody thought the girl was a terrorist; they thought she was a drug smuggler. Suspicion of drug smuggling has been taken very seriously for decades - it didn't start with the Patriot Act. Somehow, I don't think that authorities who checked the bags at the airport during the Clinton administration, would have been any more amused by this girl's practical joke, than are those who are checking bags during W's admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #21
34. My hunch is that they're so busy trying the eighth of weed in someones bag
they're going to MISS the people with the weapons.

But that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #21
42. Why do you do that?
Why do you think comparing two items that have nothing to do with each other is an argument? A condom is not a replica of any weapon whatsoever, well, in this context anyway. Why do you pretend it is? I'll never understand why people hyperbolate like that.

Sure, she should have been stopped. But at the same time, you ought to be concerned that we're getting false positives out of flour. How safe does that make us???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #42
48. Weapons and drugs are both no-nos on a plane...
Edited on Sat Dec-31-05 03:08 AM by Hobarticus
If you have the commnon sense to realize that trying to smuggle in fake weapons is a bad idea, then why carry fake drugs on a plane? Aren't both REAL items illegal? What's the difference?

She wasn't carrying a bag of flour. She was carrying white powder packed into condoms. She purposely dressed flour like narcotics. Stupid.

It isn't hyperbole to try and apply the same faulty logic that someone is using to another circumstance. It doesn't have to be fake guns. Name any other thing you know is illegal, and simulate it.

I am concerned that there was a false positive. But, that's not what's being discussed in this context.

Look, all I asked was, way back in my original post, why anyone would do this. Then I'm told I'm paranoid, being overly PC, and living in fear. Let's talk about hyperbole, shall we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. So put out to all college kids. Do not pack flour
it could be a cause to keep you three weeks in jail according to Osama and W. We're still waiting on the degree of guilt assumed if you pack condoms. Certainly do not combine condoms and flour. To do so, is PC incorrect and you could be locked up a long time. W has done away with the Constitution. So don't look there for help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #48
52. College kids have fun
I've yet to see an American female college kid be a national security threat. But we now live under Osama and W. The world has changed (sarcasm intended)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #48
58. Now you're switching your argument
You said they were weapon like replicas. They weren't. Hyperbole. Hysterial arguments. Absolutely useless.

Our government, on the other hand, couldn't tell the difference between flour and dangerous substances. If you're so damned concerned for your safety, THAT ought to be where your concern lies. Not some dumb college prank. We used to know that in this country, I don't know where in the hell that kind of common sense went.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #58
62. No, I did not switch my argument....read for content...
I gave a hypothetical situation to frame flawed logic in.

I am concerned for my safety, and the false positive and the resultant three-weeks' detainment does concern me. But that's not what I was talking about, and that never came up in the post until you brought it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #62
65. Don't you think it should have???
That's my point. You go off the deep end about a nothing little joke, but don't even recognize the REAL danger which is that your government is INCOMPETENT. Geezo.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #65
72. In the context of the discussion I was having? No.
Edited on Sat Dec-31-05 03:48 AM by Hobarticus
Go way back, to post #6. It's mine. I'll recap:

"Why would anyone do something like this?"

You'll note that the other poster isn't talking about government incompetence, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #72
73. Yeah, instead of
my government doesn't know the difference between flour and drugs and that's unacceptable to me.

Who cares why she did it? What if it was me and my special apple brown betty topping in a tupperware dish? Would you be asking why I did that? Isn't it just as likely to carry drugs, or anything else, in a tupperware dish as a condom? Don't you want the government to be able to tell the difference?

I know why she did it, people do stupid things because that's the way people are. So friggin' what. We spend billions of dollars on testing equipment in order to know when we're in danger, that's the entire point of spending the money. Our government failed, a-gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #73
75. Why do you do that?
Edited on Sat Dec-31-05 04:11 AM by Hobarticus
Why do you think comparing two items that have nothing to do with each other is an argument?

I just hate it when people get all hyperbolic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #75
76. flour is flour
Whereas, a condom isn't a bomb. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #76
78. ...and your special apple brown betty topping is delish, I'm sure
Edited on Sat Dec-31-05 04:23 AM by Hobarticus
Go chastise another poster. There's several here in this thread who could use re-education.

Peace out. Good luck to the Seahawks, seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #78
79. Thank you
It's been a long time coming. Seriously. A couple years ago we were ready to have a ceremonial paraphernalia burning in the front yard, seahawk paraphernalia, not the flour kind. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #79
80. I'll PayPal you ten bucks if you smuggle a football in a condom on a plane
Just had to give Holmgren some time. I knew he'd get the Seahawks' to the show, eventually.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #80
82. lol, well,
it'd be the Amtrak because if I decide to let loose of some cash to go to a game, that's how we'd go. I sure as hell can't come up with the bucks for Detroit, if we make it that far.

Defense. The defense FINALLY got it together. That's what I think. I've been watching for decades, but I still don't know enough to analyze a game or a strategy. Then again, I can't play chess either. And I'm still waiting for somebody to break a leg or something. I feel like a Boston fan, it'll never happen, and don't even pretend that you think it will or you'll jinx it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #48
100. Wrong.
"She purposely dressed flour like narcotics."

Actually, she made joke 'stress-balls' out of flour and condoms and was taking them home to give as gag gifts.

Stupid college prank.

The test never should have come back positive, and she never should have spent more than a few minutes being detained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #21
53. Sure police can be suspicious and test the white powder.
The problem is she was arrested and held under an ungodly bond in jail for three weeks on the basis of a test that was fucked up. It was either incompetence or fraud on the part of the cops.

And it sounds bogus: The powder tested positive for opium AND cocaine? Pretty strange.

And goddamnit, they could have just tasted it to verify if they were such hotshot narcs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #53
55. W's and Osama's America
I hope she gets results from her suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #53
61. THERE's the real problem...
Look, I'm not defending the bogus results, or the cops, or anything. It was dumb, but she didn't deserve to cool her heels for three weeks based on a false positive, or even on poor judgement. I'm not endorsing that at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #61
66. No College kid deserves 3 weeks in jail
for condoms and flour packed in her luggage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #66
68. Or for a stupid stunt...never said she did n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #68
70. The stupidity was the actions of the authorities
She has a right to privacy which W and Osama are shredding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neweurope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #68
86. It was'nt even a stunt. Read my post Nr.85



------------------

Remember Fallujah

Bush to The Hague!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #21
83. What if she had filled them with jelly, or pellets or beans?
What's ok and what's not? This is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
56. I've gotta agree - Pretty Stupid
I hope they get countersued for wasting everyone's time due to their joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
74. Yeah
really it was pretty stupid and anyway where was the humor in that supposed to be. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
93. Being stoopid is not a crime (thankfully) and is certainly not
sufficient reason to be jailed for 3 weeks on 1/2 million dollar bond. This is almost as outrageous as your admonishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
23. Interestingly enough, pre 9-11... EVERY time I flew out of that airport.
Edited on Sat Dec-31-05 02:40 AM by impeachdubya
when I was visiting my then-girlfriend, now wife, at school...

I got "randomly" selected for a bag x-ray and super thorough search. Go sit on that chair, while this cop will watch to make sure you don't make a break for it... What could it be, I wondered? Hmmmm? Could I be on a list? Did I look shifty? Was it just crazy odds?

I mean, this happened EVERY fucking time I was in that airport. And again, this was way before 9-11.

Or could it possibly be something else.. hmmmmmmmm........ my past-my-shoulder length hair, maybe?

Yeah. The bag security guys always seemed extra excited, like they had 'nabbed' a hippie. Sorry chums, not a stem, not a seed- those days are long past me. Maybe if you had searched my duffel bag back in college... but no such luck. Waaaah. Thanks for making me almost miss my plane again, though.

This has never happened on the West Coast. Only on the East, where apparently it's still :crazy: really weird :crazy: for a man to have long hair, and we must all look like drug smugglers straight out of "Easy Rider".:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. My 8 year old neice was nabbed by the airport handlers
She had metal brads in her designer jeans. She was wanded, searched, shoes x-rayed and all the rest of the paranoia. Osama and W at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. I have longish hair
and a beard most of the time. and I don't get picked for greater security than I would expect. My license looks remarkably like a mug shot of a terrorist as developed by "24" olive complexion, long hair and a beard. I pay cash for plane tickets, and I still don't get searched. strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. They're watching you, maybe
they probably figure you're some kind of ringleader.. :hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. is that the clicking noise on my phone?
I was wondering what that was.

maybe it's because I'm a government informant? I jsut made 50 bucks selling your ass down the river! ain't not entrapment any more! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #33
38. Wow. I had no idea I was so valuable.
I should have sold my own ass down the river. Dammit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. I'll smuggle you in some fruitcake
you can use it in the secret detention facilities to buy stuff. for some reason, fruitcake is like smokes in Attica, pure gold. who knows why?

that and brush. do you have any brush avaliable that you could be seen clearing? the big guy likes that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #40
77. I don't think I'll fit in the fruitcake
but I'll bring a snorkel just in case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neweurope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
30. The case even made it into the German media. Stupid of
the girl to carry those condomes along (can't even understand why the girls think flour-filled condomes are funny in the first place, but then I live in one of the many sexually open countries). HOWEVER it took the authorities THREE WEEKS to find out it was only flour. That's irresponsible. And 500 000 bail is incredible.

If the two initial tests really showed drugs where there was only flour - than those tests must be thrown into the garbage, pronto. I shudder to think how many others might land in jail because of faulty tests - maybe people without money and outside family and friends to help them out of the mess.

----------------------

Remember Fallujah

Bush to The Hague!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
54. Joke: Something said or done to evoke laughter
or amusement, especially an amusing story with a punch line.
A mischievous trick; a prank.
An amusing or ludicrous incident or situation.

Ok, I guess this falls under the mischievous trick category. But my god. What a stupid, stupid thing to do.
It is a crime that a "joke" does not have to be funny.
This three-week detention thing is utter bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neweurope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #54
85. No joke, no prank, just thoughtlessness.
In the article I read in German DER SPIEGEL - exactly the same article, just a little longer - it was explained that the girls in school gave each other those condoms, that they played around with them while studying, it was supposed to be "relaxing". The girl just took the stupid condom with her as a keepsake, that was all. She didn't even mean to play a prank on the airport personnel at all. Imagine the poor child being in jail, thinking for weeks she'd have to stay there - totally innocent - for 20 years. Boy, your system sucks.

--------------------------

Remember Fallujah

Bush to The Hague!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #85
89. Where'd the flour come from, then?
She "relaxed" by putting flour into a condom? Doesn't that sound a little strange to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neweurope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #89
113. The flour probably came from a supermarket, or wherever
Americans buy flour normally.

Yes,it sounds strange to me. But then everything that concernes ANYTHING even remotely sexual in the US sounds strange to me. Compared to Europe the US seem to be very stuck up. In Europe sexuality is totally in the open, and college girls would not think flour filled condoms a joke. Twelve year olds might, though - no idea, been decades since I've been a twelve year old :)

The article in DER SPIEGEL said (my very bad translation):

"We squeeze them in our hands while we are studying. That helps against the learning stress"... making such (flour filled) condoms while having a little party in the dormitory was a joke among girls and a traditional gag among the first semesters at Bryn Mawr..."

I have no idea whether first semesters at Bryn Mawr really do this or not. And I really don't care all that much: Somebody was in jail for three weeks for flour. If I were American and cared I'd try to find out, though. :)

----------------

Remember Fallujah

Bush to The Hague!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #85
91. So why did they put flour in them? Relaxing with a condom? We're not
getting the full story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neweurope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #91
114. See my post Nr. 113.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
84. I understand why she would be upset...
why would a drug screen test flour positive as drugs? :shrug:

But on the other hand, who in their right mind thinks it's okay to 'play a joke' at an airport in this day and age? What in the world possessed her to do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhereIsMyFreedom Donating Member (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #84
102. She wasn't playing a joke at the airport
A flour-filled condom was a device that she and her friends at school were using as stress relief. Like those squeeze balls you can buy at the store, except that these were home made. I think they are funny in a college-age immature sort of way. She just happened to try carrying them in her luggage while traveling without realizing that it might be a stupid idea.

Did she deserve to be searched and the contents of the condoms tested? Absolutely. Did she deserve THREE WEEKS in jail without a trial (or for that matter evidence of a crime) Absolutely NOT. I thought there were laws in this country about how long someone could be detained without evidence. The police broke the law in my opinion and she deserves to be compensated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #102
117. Of course not.
I know I didn't imply that she does deserve what happened to her. I just wanted to know what she was thinking. Anyone who has watched even a little news in the last few years knows that you don't do that sort of thing at an airport -- even before 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
95. What a moron. What purpose does flour in a condom serve?
Seriously. What kind of a fucking idiot brings flower filled condoms on an airplane?

It has nothing to do with W, 9/11, or Anthrax.

Cocaine filled condoms is how people smuggle small amounts into the country. We've been looking for that sort of thing since the 70's.

You'd have to be a complete, utter, moron to bring something like this on an airplane.

No sympathy for this girl. Some lessons need to be learned the hard way for some, and she seems to lack common sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
99. What an idiot. "Pain and suffering"???
Oh brother. What kind of moran would actually think it was funny to fill up balloons with flour? I've been around, but believe me... it would never occur to me that people put drugs in balloons. She doesn't deserve 500k, what a greedy ignoramous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhereIsMyFreedom Donating Member (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #99
103. "What an idiot"
You are absolutely right. She deserves the 3 weeks in jail for attempting humor that you didn't find funny. :eyes: In fact, I advocate jailing all comedians that I don't find funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #103
106. She IS an idiot. A condom filled with white powder... Sounds like cocaine
I mean seriously. This has nothing to do with a sense of humor. It has to do with common sense.

You don't bring a damn condom filled with white powder on an airplane unless you want a rectal exam by a DEA agent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhereIsMyFreedom Donating Member (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #106
110. But it wasn't cocaine
And therefore they have no justification for putting her in jail. Something that looks like a drug is probable cause to do a search but it had better really be a drug if they are going to jail her for three weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neweurope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #110
115. Yes / nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
104. Dumb thing to do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
105. I'm not surprised about the prelim test results
Going thru airport security a couple of years ago, my purse showed traces of explosives. I can't remember if it was a wand or a sniffer thing they used. Anyway, they took me in the back and checked it out further. I informed them that I had spilled a cup of water on my purse which had a handful of vitamins in it---they all disintegrated in my purse. They shrugged and let me go.

Some of the equipment they use is not very precise and picks up false positives.

I'm curious about the security device I walked through in Toronto to get into a building. It looked like a metal dectector you walk through at airports but it had air jets that blew air on you and explosive sniffer devices. Why don't our airports have these?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
108. A weekend in the joint would have been plenty
There are people who need to go to jail just for being fucking stupid. This is one of them.

Who the fuck thinks walking around like a Drug Mule with white powder-filled condoms in her suitcase is funny? I would think that if someone took this kind of thing through a TSA checkpoint, the resulting bedlam at the checkpoint would delay a lot of people and either cause some of them to miss their flights or cause airlines to try to reshuffle their whole schedules to compensate.

If I'd have been the security guys and the cops in this situation, I'd have "blown" the field test on purpose, thrown her ass in jail, left it there to sweat for a day or so, then pulled her into the nastiest-looking interrogation room I could find, explained what a drug mule is and how they transport small amounts of narcotics, then taken her back to the airport. And because I'm nice, I would have called the airline and asked them to reschedule her flight so she could get where she was going. She needed a good sound whack on the nose with a newspaper that has a 2x4 rolled up in it, but three weeks is definitely excessive. (If she wins this case, it's going to revolve around the length of her detention and not the fact of it.)

It's probably illegal as hell to do this, but I guarantee that she wouldn't have tried packing flour-filled condoms in her luggage again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #108
109. If the cops did do as you suggested you want to do, they deserve jail time
I can't believe some of the responses, first at the ignorance displayed as to WHY she had them on her in the first place, as stress "ball" gag gifts for family and friends. And second that keeping someone in jail for 3 weeks is somehow acceptable, even for a weekend it is too much, with no evidence and no cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC